Is this what you would expect in an MS-67?

Comments

• GoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭

  May 24, 2008 2:12PM

  The obverse is right on the line between MS66 and 67.
  
  The reverse is MS68.
  
  MS67 seems like a fitting grade, IMO

  0
• DJCoinz Posts: 3,856 ✭

  May 24, 2008 2:15PM

  Low end 67,
  
  high end 66.
  
  I'd prefer one with less marks in the focal areas though.

  aka Dan

  0
• stman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 24, 2008 2:18PM

  Looks like something that 20 years ago would be called a nice 65.

  Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!

  0
• OneCent Posts: 3,561 ✭

  May 24, 2008 2:33PM

  I suspect that in the relatively near future there will be a consolidation of generously graded material. I think that the trend is already slanted in that direction.

  
  Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
  ANA Member R-3147111

  0
• vplite Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭

  May 24, 2008 2:53PM

  Another thing that confuses me is PCGS calling this a $1000 coin. I just don't get it.

  The Golden Rule: Those with the gold make the rules.

  0
• lcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 24, 2008 8:50PM

  No,
  
  Also its interesting that there are over 4000 ncg and pcgs ms67s in the pop report 1880s
  is that right?

  LCoopie = Les

  0
• Tvac897 Posts: 1,478

  May 24, 2008 10:51PM

  
  
  << <i>Another thing that confuses me is PCGS calling this a $1000 coin. I just don't get it. >>
  
  
  
  Why is this confusing?

  -Rome is Burning
  
  

  0