Buyer disagreeing with PSA wants refund

I sold a PSA 7 1980 Bird/Magic rookie about 2 weeks ago and the seller is upset and states the card is "a mess". He is complaining about print spots. I gave a good scan and he complains that I should have had a better scan. My auction clearly states that there are no returns on graded cards. What would you do as a seller? This man disagrees with PSA and wants me to give him a refund. He says he is a 50 year collector so I am wondering whether he understands the grading of PSA. I offered him a refund since the buyer is supposed to be always correct. Is there any way I can recoup my losses from ebay for the listing fee and the juice? I explained to the buyer that 95% of people would not refund such a purchase because as a buyer you are paying for the said condition PSA has deemed the card. This is a first for me in 10 years on ebay so I guess I shouldn't complain too much.
0
Comments
Bosox1976
I would also let him know that you will be adding him to your blocked bidder list..
who needs that
If the buyer comes across as a good guy and not a butthole about it, I would most certainly honor the request.
V/R
SFC Peeples
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
bird auction
You can get the FVF fees back if you file an unpaid item dispute and click on mutually agreed not to complete. You get FVF fees back but not listing fees.
It's worth using photobucket to host your ebay pics. You've had some real nice cards lately (ryan, mays) and the big scans help people spend more money. Just put the scan in your description, if you need help to do it PM me and I'll show you how.
<< <i>If the buyer comes across as a good guy and not a butthole about it, I would most certainly honor the request. >>
I would, too. I'd make the guy happy, and if I didn't want to deal with him again, I'd block him from bidding.
My policy has been to take returns, but only a few customers over the years have done so. The ones I can think of that have returned cards have remained customers. Surprisingly, nobody has abused the policy and returned cards repeatedly.
Vintage Football Card Gallery
Dont refund his shipping, he will still be out shipping both directions.
Lastly, if you relist it like this auction, without the extra description, you will probably get close to what he paid or more anyway....
BIRD ROOKIE
Thanks,
Mark
<< <i>.....plus you said it should be higher grade if resubmitted....... >>
He did not, but who is to say it wouldn't until it is actually resubmitted?
Instead of basing my opinions on hofautos' re-write of the auction I checked for myself, and here is what was actually written in the auction: "I thought it would at least receive and 8 but it did not." Then after a sentence about shipping terms, he states "This card has 4 sharp corners and should be regraded."
The seller is not guaranteeing anything, just hyping (maybe over-hyping) his card like MANY sellers on eBay do. That being said, do I feel there should have been a larger scan, yes.
<< <i>You're right Nick - I misread and thought he meant it should be regraded because it would be higher.
Jim, im sure that is what he meant, but he never actually says the words (like hofautos said he did), and I agree with you 100% about the poor scan in the auction.
<< <i>
Jim, im sure that is what he meant, but he never actually says the words (like hofautos said he did), and I agree with you 100% about the poor scan in the auction. >>
He did infer should be higher grade if resubmitted.
To me - the following two statements does infer that it could be resubmitted for possibly an 8, and at minimum, it infers that seller believed that it is a high grade 7 or low grade 8, which seller even repeats above. I know if i read the below two statements, and then got a card with a lot of print spots, i would be a little upset, especially if they were not mentioned or at least visible in scan.
"I thought it would at least receive and 8 but it did not." PLUS "This card has 4 sharp corners and should be regraded."
Nevermind all this Bird/Magic stuff anyway. Let's go buy some Berkmans and break out all our Maddux cards.
<< <i>So you base your buying on eBay by what the seller infers to you with his wording? Very odd. >>
actually, if the scan was small, i would ask the seller for a larger scan, as i typically do....but the buyer didnt in this case, so I would rely on the seller's description...
<< <i>Nick- Carlos Boozer just had a great game against the Lakers. I say we all show off our Boozer cards!!!!! >>
Makes more sense to me than poker threads...
If a buyer wants a 9, then don't buy my 7 and complain its not a 9. "
///////////////////////////////////////
Yup.
<< <i>"I don't think the seller did anything wrong. He gave the guy a refund, I would say 99 out of 100 buyers would have been happy.
If a buyer wants a 9, then don't buy my 7 and complain its not a 9. "
///////////////////////////////////////
Yup. >>
I agree...he said he was going to give a refund. Good seller IMHO!
I kinda liked my maddux thread...oh well....
He is not happy with the card, give him the refund he wants, its simple.
I regretfully made that mistake in buying a very sweet raw 1963 Rose after asking and receiving multiple close up scans of corners, and surface. After getting assurances of the perfect corners and surface....I pulled the trigger. When I got the card, my heart sank...I went back to the scans to verify it was the same card...how in the world did I ignore the crappy centerring?? I did not ask for a refund...I just obsessed on the chance that it was a 9...and shut my brain off. My mistake, not the seller's
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Sadly, self-hosting photos NOW earns sellers points towards the punishment package in Best-Match.
<< <i>So I will give him the refund. I actually think the card should have been an 8. I pulled it out of a pack this summer and it looks like an 8 to me. I may get it regraded.
Thanks,
Mark >>
With that L/R centering I don't see an 8 in that cards future.