"Now, there are two cosmetic issues with the case that I want to disclose to potential bidders. At the top of the case, there seems to be a glue(?) mark where the case comes together--it has no impact on the condition of the card--merely cosmetic. Also, at the bottom of the case, there is a small chip--once again ZERO impact on the card--merely cosmetic. These issues are minor, but I want potential bidders to know in advance."
Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
Wasted by having it put in a BCCG slab of all things. They may have well used Mint grading or GradeMyCards in my opinion. I know, "buy the card and not the holder" but the value of this BCCG card has at least been cut in half while residing in that holder. Again in my opinion. This is what a good one looks like but too bad that BGS' holders don't scan worth a darn on my scanner:
Comments
"Now, there are two cosmetic issues with the case that I want to disclose to potential bidders. At the top of the case, there seems to be a glue(?) mark where the case comes together--it has no impact on the condition of the card--merely cosmetic. Also, at the bottom of the case, there is a small chip--once again ZERO impact on the card--merely cosmetic. These issues are minor, but I want potential bidders to know in advance."
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>Well, maybe this is a change to pick up a bargain, if someone is will to crack it and submit it to PSA?? >>
Thats what I was thinking. Have bought several BCCG 10s that would grade anywhere from 8 to 10 PSA.