Official American eagle error coin list- how many
pitboss
Posts: 8,643 ✭✭✭
did you get?
I just opened a box of 12 and got 12 errors. Another box of 10 produced none at all.
I just opened a box of 12 and got 12 errors. Another box of 10 produced none at all.
0
Comments
What better way to spice up a collection than with eye visible varieties!
Throw in the First Strike™ slabs and that add's a bunch more to the set!
The name is LEE!
-Paul
<< <i>Is it not an error when some one mixes up the dies? Was this an intentional act by a mint employee to cause this? I do not feel this was an accidental mixup. >>
The Mint is so inept that nothing surprises me except the notion that they "planned" this.
This IS the government remember.
<< <i>I have 30 and it's 16 to 14. This is not an error but rather a variety so I would not expect the recent eBay $125 for an MS69 to last more than a few days. Nice to have a variety though after 22 years of the same exact ASEs. Maybe this will generate some interest in the series and we can find some real errors. >>
Whether this is considered an error or a variety I would think the market value would depend on the rarity and that may go up or down depending on how many escaped the clutches of the mint. I would think that once word gets back to the mint that variety will be stopped. My latest NN says 180 thousand have been sold and the mint doesn't seem to be too far ahead of sales in production so if the ratio was near 50/50 for the full run then maybe 90 thousand but I doubt it would be that much-possibly much less.
<< <i>This is gonna play out way cool for the SAE collector's!
What better way to spice up a collection than with eye visible varieties!
>>
I agree! Varieties that a non-collector can plainly see with the naked eye are way more exciting than some "Small date" 1970 cent or type 2/type1 Ikes, SBAs.
<< <i>I'm waiting for PCGS to make a decision on weather or not they will make a first strike designation. They have until the 23rd. >>
I have a 2008 SAE labeled first strike. Why wouldn't they offer that on the 2008-W SAE?
If so then I hope they do it more often. Of course I would hate to see some mint employees get fired just to stir things up for the collector.
These seem to be from the ones being delivered in the past couple of weeks. My first subscription order had none in it. The box that shipped out last tuesday is the one with 12 errors in it.
Steve
Are these UNC or Proof? Seems that they are being found in both.
Anyone looking for 2007 reverse of '08s yet?
Issue date for the 08-W UNC was 3/17 so it's probably too late for opened boxes.
Although I like PCGS better, it seems to me that NGC has less of a milkspotting with their slabs.
I'll probably send mine to them for this reason.
Regards,
John
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
<< <i>I just opened a box of 12 and got 12 errors. Another box of 10 produced none at all.
Are these UNC or Proof? Seems that they are being found in both.
Anyone looking for 2007 reverse of '08s yet?
Issue date for the 08-W UNC was 3/17 so it's probably too late for opened boxes.
Although I like PCGS better, it seems to me that NGC has less of a milkspotting with their slabs.
I'll probably send mine to them for this reason.
Regards,
John >>
Are you sure about the Proofs? I have not heard any reports of Proofs being found with the Reverse of 2007.
TD
<< <i>Hi David,
These seem to be from the ones being delivered in the past couple of weeks. My first subscription order had none in it. The box that shipped out last tuesday is the one with 12 errors in it.
Steve >>
Steve, What was the order # Thanks in advance. David
Thread from yesterday:
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=652475
Dang how do you guys make a link work? HELP!
Regards,
John
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
My order # was287108**
Steve
<< <i>Are you sure about the Proofs? I have not heard any reports of Proofs being found with the Reverse of 2007.
Thread from yesterday:
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=652475
Dang how do you guys make a link work? HELP!
Regards,
John >>
Just give the name of the thread and we'll find it.
TD
HELP! Is this a 2008 W ASE Proof with a 2007 reverse!??
On p.6
Regards,
John
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
<< <i>Just give the name of the thread and we'll find it.
HELP! Is this a 2008 W ASE Proof with a 2007 reverse!??
On p.6
Regards,
John >>
OK, I remember the original, unedited post, which did not show a reverse of 2007. Now he has a picture that does.
Under the circumstances, I would like to see a confirmation piece from another source before saying that Proofs exist.
TD
TD
<< <i>Is it not an error when some one mixes up the dies? Was this an intentional act by a mint employee to cause this? I do not feel this was an accidental mixup. >>
No, it is not an error even when this occurs. It's still a variety.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>Just give the name of the thread and we'll find it.
HELP! Is this a 2008 W ASE Proof with a 2007 reverse!??
On p.6
Regards,
John >>
OK, I remember the original, unedited post, which did not show a reverse of 2007. Now he has a picture that does.
Under the circumstances, I would like to see a confirmation piece from another source before saying that Proofs exist.
TD >>
Hey guys, yeah, that was my post. I bought the coin off of eBay, but I have a bad feeling the guy simply took a picture of the front of the slab and the reverse picture is of a completely different (and older) ASE....
-Paul
I checked my 2008-W burnished, bullion and proof -- they are the 2008 reverse. Just have one of each.