Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Here is an interesting tidbit about Gold and Oil. Just thought I would share.

mrpaseomrpaseo Posts: 4,753 ✭✭✭
Mar 14 2008 12:01PM

The Other Reason to Own Gold

Everybody knows that gold is an inflation hedge. That’s why most people buy it. They know from experience that the purchasing power of all national currencies is being constantly eroded by inflation. But they also know that their purchasing power is preserved by owning gold.

For example, the price of crude oil has been rising for decades when viewed in terms of dollars or any national currency. But when the cost of a barrel of crude oil is viewed in terms of ounces or grams of gold, its price is essentially unchanged. In other words, the dollar price of crude oil and the dollar price of gold are both rising more or less lockstep.By owning gold instead of US dollars, you can today purchase basically the same amount of crude oil as at any other time since 1945.

In other words, gold is an inflation hedge. But that is only one of gold’s advantages. There is also another valuable reason to own gold, and significantly, this other reason is becoming increasingly important.

Gold is also a catastrophe hedge. Gold enables us to protect our wealth from a financial meltdown because it does not have counterparty risk.

I wrote about counterparty risk last August in an article entitled “As Financial Tremors Reverberate, Focus on Counterparty Risk”. I recommend re-reading that article for a refresher course on the nature of counterparty risk and how it arises. It is I think important to recognize that the financial tremors are indeed reverberating, and are doing so with growing ferocity. http://www.kitco.com/ind/Turk/turk_aug102007.html

The monetary and financial system is rapidly spinning out of control. We are witnessing the unwinding of decades of reckless credit expansion. Borrowers – corporations, hedge funds, homeowners, etc. – who no longer have the financial capacity to repay their debts are defaulting on their obligations in increasing numbers. In that environment, the safety of one’s wealth becomes paramount, to protect against the catastrophe of default in all types of financial assets.

In short, promises are being broken, so in an environment in which financial assets are becoming increasingly doubted, one needs to own tangible assets. Own things instead of promises, and there is only one money that is not dependent upon someone’s promise and that’s gold. So buy gold; it is the best catastrophe hedge. But also buy gold because it remains the best inflation hedge.

For example, gold was $670 on August 10, 2007 when my article on counterparty risk was published, and crude oil was $71.50 per barrel. When viewed in terms of gold, crude oil was 3.3 goldgrams per barrel.

Gold today is $992, and crude oil is $109. So both prices have risen considerably in dollar terms, but the price of crude oil today is 3.4 goldgrams per barrel, essentially unchanged from last August. Gold performed as expected, being a nearly perfect hedge against inflation.

So when considering all of its advantages, gold provides what everyone wants – peace of mind knowing that the portion of your wealth placed in gold is safe.

by James Turk

*****

James Turk is the Founder & Chairman of GoldMoney.com http://goldmoney.com/. He is the co-author of The Coming Collapse of the Dollar , which has been updated for a newly released paperback version, now entitled The Collapse of the Dollar www.dollarcollapse.com.

Copyright © 2008 by James Turk. All rights reserved.

See story here: http://www.kitco.com/ind/Turk/turk_mar142008.html

Comments

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    An ounce of gold is a lot easier to move around than 10 barrels of oil, too image
    image
  • Options
    StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MrP: Thanks for the James Turk post.

    image

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,371 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Oil vs Gold and Dow vs Gold trends

    A nice graphic representation of the trends. Make your own call on where we go from here. These are great charts.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Great thread/article. Once on-demand hydrogen becomes common we won't need any of that oil anymore but we wil need gold!
  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Great thread/article. Once on-demand hydrogen becomes common we won't need any of that oil anymore but we wil need gold! >>



    How are you going to produce the hydrogen. You still need oil for the factories.
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    The US has recently developed a catalyst using certain metals that when pure water is passed through, oxygen collects on one side hydrogen on the other. In that way hydrogen can be generated on demand and not stored which is the danger today. Sure it will take oil to get it going but once when have power plants doing it in large scale no more oil, coal or natural gas will be needed. The funny thing is most of the oil rich countries don't have a lot of extra water. Ironic.
  • Options
    RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    Reads like a thoroughly biased, self promotional article with few facts, no references to objective infomration and lots of assumptions. "Everybody knows...."
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 22,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not an economist and have never taken any economic courses, but articles like this annoy men when they do not reference from where they are basing their statistics or values. In these articles you either have to take on faith what the author is writing or you have to determine for yourself if the author is fairly objective, incredibly biased or somewhere in between. The author states that the gold-to-oil ratio has remained nearly constant since 1945 yet when I attempt to confirm this profound statement I cannot get figures to match. Since the author links another of his articles from the Kitco site I have decided to use average yearly London fix prices in US dollars from the Kitco site vs. oil average yearly free market price of IL crude as presented by IOGA. The London fix prices can be found at Kitco while the IL crude prices can be found at InflationData. My chart goes back to 1946 because this is the earliest that I can find oil data. The chart also shows that there is not a consistent ratio between the two and that the swings in the ratio have been over three-fold during this time. That is a large difference and would appear to shoot down the objectivity of the article, if not the research itself.

    Since I am no expert in this area I would appreciate those of you who support this article to provide a reference for the price data that is used to make such a strong assertion since I cannot find price data to backup the initial claim. Please note that I do believe we are in dire straights and that our economic situation is very poor. I am also a buyer of gold and silver. Therefore, I am not a "hater" of PMs.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,371 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not an economist either but I provided a worthy gold/oil chart above covering the last 15 years. It's clear that gold/oil ratio tended to be much higher in the 80's and early 90's. Since 1999 it has trended lower. In other words more power to oil. This would seem to correlate well with the manipulation of the gold cartel and central banks to keep supressed in the later 1990's and on. If anything, I'd say gold will outperform oil going forward in the short to medium term based on that chart. Momentum also favors gold as well.

    Turk is a fairly respected gold-bug. While his views are decidedly pro-pro-gold and then some, I don't find anything he's written to be deceptive. Just my 2 cents. He certainly has not be as deceptive as the FED, BLS, large banks, and the govt where we have typically been fed information from. Yes, he did state oil and gold have been performing in lock step and within the last 5 years, both have sort of shot up, though not in unison. One certainly didn't go broke following Turk's advice since 2001. Gold/oil ratio is in a tighter channel since 2001 which does tend to support them working up together....though not in lock step.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you trade one against the other, I guess it's important. But there is also something to be said for diversification of risk while at the same time recognizing the inflation that is being created by the Fed. A 100% correlation may or may not be such a good thing anyhow. If it's a perfect 1:1 correlation, why use both?
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • Options
    DeadhorseDeadhorse Posts: 3,720


    << <i>The US has recently developed a catalyst using certain metals that when pure water is passed through, oxygen collects on one side hydrogen on the other. In that way hydrogen can be generated on demand and not stored which is the danger today. Sure it will take oil to get it going but once when have power plants doing it in large scale no more oil, coal or natural gas will be needed. The funny thing is most of the oil rich countries don't have a lot of extra water. Ironic. >>



    Hydrogen will NEVER replace oil. Never.

    It's impractical for more reasons than I care to list, but needing a fuel tank the size of a U-Haul trailer is pretty good for starters.

    At one time, it seemed to have promise, but now the shortcomings are surfacing and they are multitude.

    It's even more foolish than ethanol, and that has been a disaster.

    The is no shortage of oil and there never will be, the planet produces more of it daily than we can ever use.

    Contrary to common PC thinking, it is a very renewable resource.

    It's this same sot of thinking that has millions of acres of trees dying of old age and falling over, creating fire hazards in the process.

    This country used to have 7 major plywood mills, we supplied the world.

    Thanks to the Al Gore mindset, we now have three, but actually only one full time major mill when there were seven like it not so long ago.

    Check the rise in the price and and the lack of quality in simple plywood over the last 12 years. It's a 600-700% increase in price and a 50% decrease in quality. There is no logical reason for it. Today you have to buy A/B to get the quality of what was C/D. So today we cover our roofs in press board due to cost, of course it dissolves in contact with water. Brilliant!

    It's this same thinking that is pushing for hydrogen.

    Just more "feel good" legislation. Same reason we have useless catalytic converters adding to the cost of vehicles and doing nothing for pollution in the process.

    Today's internal combustion engines are 95% more efficient than those of only 15 years ago and that's simply due to capitalism.

    Let the free market reign. That would bring about the immediate death of hydrogen as a common fuel source, as well as ethanol made from corn.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • Options
    zrlevinzrlevin Posts: 734 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The US has recently developed a catalyst using certain metals that when pure water is passed through, oxygen collects on one side hydrogen on the other. In that way hydrogen can be generated on demand and not stored which is the danger today. Sure it will take oil to get it going but once when have power plants doing it in large scale no more oil, coal or natural gas will be needed. The funny thing is most of the oil rich countries don't have a lot of extra water. Ironic. >>



    Hydrogen will NEVER replace oil. Never.

    It's impractical for more reasons than I care to list, but needing a fuel tank the size of a U-Haul trailer is pretty good for starters.

    At one time, it seemed to have promise, but now the shortcomings are surfacing and they are multitude.

    It's even more foolish than ethanol, and that has been a disaster.

    The is no shortage of oil and there never will be, the planet produces more of it daily than we can ever use.

    Contrary to common PC thinking, it is a very renewable resource.

    It's this same sot of thinking that has millions of acres of trees dying of old age and falling over, creating fire hazards in the process.

    This country used to have 7 major plywood mills, we supplied the world.

    Thanks to the Al Gore mindset, we now have three, but actually only one full time major mill when there were seven like it not so long ago.

    Check the rise in the price and and the lack of quality in simple plywood over the last 12 years. It's a 600-700% increase in price and a 50% decrease in quality. There is no logical reason for it. Today you have to buy A/B to get the quality of what was C/D. So today we cover our roofs in press board due to cost, of course it dissolves in contact with water. Brilliant!

    It's this same thinking that is pushing for hydrogen.

    Just more "feel good" legislation. Same reason we have useless catalytic converters adding to the cost of vehicles and doing nothing for pollution in the process.

    Today's internal combustion engines are 95% more efficient than those of only 15 years ago and that's simply due to capitalism.

    Let the free market reign. That would bring about the immediate death of hydrogen as a common fuel source, as well as ethanol made from corn. >>



    Um...wow. I do hope you are joking.
    Zach
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>

    << <i>The US has recently developed a catalyst using certain metals that when pure water is passed through, oxygen collects on one side hydrogen on the other. In that way hydrogen can be generated on demand and not stored which is the danger today. Sure it will take oil to get it going but once when have power plants doing it in large scale no more oil, coal or natural gas will be needed. The funny thing is most of the oil rich countries don't have a lot of extra water. Ironic. >>



    Hydrogen will NEVER replace oil. Never.

    It's impractical for more reasons than I care to list, but needing a fuel tank the size of a U-Haul trailer is pretty good for starters.

    At one time, it seemed to have promise, but now the shortcomings are surfacing and they are multitude.

    It's even more foolish than ethanol, and that has been a disaster.

    The is no shortage of oil and there never will be, the planet produces more of it daily than we can ever use.

    Contrary to common PC thinking, it is a very renewable resource.

    It's this same sot of thinking that has millions of acres of trees dying of old age and falling over, creating fire hazards in the process.

    This country used to have 7 major plywood mills, we supplied the world.

    Thanks to the Al Gore mindset, we now have three, but actually only one full time major mill when there were seven like it not so long ago.

    Check the rise in the price and and the lack of quality in simple plywood over the last 12 years. It's a 600-700% increase in price and a 50% decrease in quality. There is no logical reason for it. Today you have to buy A/B to get the quality of what was C/D. So today we cover our roofs in press board due to cost, of course it dissolves in contact with water. Brilliant!

    It's this same thinking that is pushing for hydrogen.

    Just more "feel good" legislation. Same reason we have useless catalytic converters adding to the cost of vehicles and doing nothing for pollution in the process.

    Today's internal combustion engines are 95% more efficient than those of only 15 years ago and that's simply due to capitalism.

    Let the free market reign. That would bring about the immediate death of hydrogen as a common fuel source, as well as ethanol made from corn. >>



    Sorry, but I'm afraid you are totally wrong. This is the future and the future is now. Look at the hydrogen BMW. And no it is not worse than the disaster waiting to happen ethanol. On demand hydrogen is derived from water and when it burns it combines with O2 to produce water vapor. What is not to love.
  • Options
    DeadhorseDeadhorse Posts: 3,720


    << <i>Um...wow. I do hope you are joking. >>



    Not at all. I don't believe in junk science.

    Just like the global warming nonsense.

    The worst part is the PC thinking by our so called leaders that bring about this garbage.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • Options
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,371 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a believer in peak oil. Nothing I've read yet has convinced me that we are increasing oil supplies all the time. The so-called huge discovery 5 miles under ocean in the Gulf is just another part of the story. But global warming certainly seems like the latest scam to part everyone with their dollars, and the US in particular. In some parts of the polar caps the ice is thickening. In other parts it's retreating. Temperature patterns are largely unchanged compared to eons ago. With that logic you'll find global warming back in prehistoric times which means that dinosaur farts were the likely culprit.

    The battery powered car is another interesting concoction. It might make sense if everyone were given free solar panels with every purchase. But for now, you'll have to be content to recharge your batteries via an electrical outlet leading to coal-fired generators in the midwest somewhere. Not so green after all. And what's not to like about mining 25 tons of ore to build that new car?

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    tincuptincup Posts: 5,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Deadhorse, I agree with most of what you have said. However, I have never seen any reasonable proof that the oil supplies are renewing at a rate that you suggest, rather all that I have seen concerning this is that it is a theory only, with proof remaining to be be found. If you have any links providing more info, I would appreciate being able to check them out.

    "The is no shortage of oil and there never will be, the planet produces more of it daily than we can ever use.

    Contrary to common PC thinking, it is a very renewable resource."

    ----- kj
  • Options
    BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    A time may be coming when folks will be better

    off with a few ounces of lead in their weapons,

    then a few ounces of gold in the house.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Options
    lope208lope208 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭
    Deadhorse, I too, would like to see some data/sources on your information.

    Much of what you've stated is seemingly opposite of EVERYTHING we hear daily.

    I will reserve judgment however, since I don't necessarily trust those we're hearing it from!

    Any more info you've got to back up your post would be appreciated.


    As for global warming, it's a cyclical trend throughout time. Someday the planet will get too

    hot and unless we figure out how to adapt, humans will perish like the dinosaurs.

    Luckily for us, that time is many, many hundreds of years from now.


    So in the meantime, buy gold image
    Successful BST transactions:
    commoncents123, JrGMan2004, Coll3ctor (2), Dabigkahuna, BAJJERFAN, Boom, GRANDAM, newsman, cohodk, kklambo, seateddime, ajia, mirabela, Weather11am, keepdachange, gsa1fan, cone10
    -------------------------
  • Options
    ARCOARCO Posts: 4,453 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Deadhorse, I am going to keep heeding your indispensable advice concerning metals, agree with you on hydrogen being a dead end "energy source", and pretend I never read what you said about oil being a replenishing energy source. image

    A person only has to look at the U.S. and our nearly 50% decline from peak production in the early 70's (Predicted by M. King Hubbert) to see clearly that oil is finite, and that it will soon be more expensive to extract than it is worth to burn in automobiles as gasoline in the coming decades, and that Peak oil is a reality that will change all of our lives forever.

    Here is a fun site of doom and gloom where the naysayers can get raked over the coals as a non-believer in PO, or become informed. Peak oil web site. Enter at your own risk.

    Tyler
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>

    << <i>On demand hydrogen is derived from water and when it burns it combines with O2 to produce water vapor. What is not to love. >>



    You have to use more energy getting hydrogen from water than the hydrogen produces when it is burned. >>



    Sorry, you are wrong as well. Do you still own your Betamax?
  • Options
    tincuptincup Posts: 5,479 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Deadhorse, I am going to keep heeding your indispensable advice concerning metals, agree with you on hydrogen being a dead end "energy source", and pretend I never read what you said about oil being a replenishing energy source. image

    A person only has to look at the U.S. and our nearly 50% decline from peak production in the early 70's (Predicted by M. King Hubbert) to see clearly that oil is finite, and that it will soon be more expensive to extract than it is worth to burn in automobiles as gasoline in the coming decades, and that Peak oil is a reality that will change all of our lives forever.

    Here is a fun site of doom and gloom where the naysayers can get raked over the coals as a non-believer in PO, or become informed. Peak oil web site. Enter at your own risk.

    Tyler >>



    I've done a little reading on the website.... very eyeopening info.
    ----- kj
  • Options
    DeadhorseDeadhorse Posts: 3,720


    << <i>Deadhorse, I am going to keep heeding your indispensable advice concerning metals, agree with you on hydrogen being a dead end "energy source", and pretend I never read what you said about oil being a replenishing energy source. image

    A person only has to look at the U.S. and our nearly 50% decline from peak production in the early 70's (Predicted by M. King Hubbert) to see clearly that oil is finite, and that it will soon be more expensive to extract than it is worth to burn in automobiles as gasoline in the coming decades, and that Peak oil is a reality that will change all of our lives forever.

    Here is a fun site of doom and gloom where the naysayers can get raked over the coals as a non-believer in PO, or become informed. Peak oil web site. Enter at your own risk.

    Tyler >>



    First, let me say thank you.

    As far as the petroleum situation goes; Do people in the US realize we are the only modern civilized nation that still teaches that petroleum comes from dead dinosaurs and fauna? Nothing could be further from the truth. Keep drilling and you'll find even more petroleum below those layers of strata. What? What? How could that be? It would infer that petroleum was here long before the Dinos and other life forms. Then again, we've recently found an entire world of petroleum in our own solar system. That would be the moon Titan orbiting Saturn. This alone should cause some of us to ponder about the origin of hydrocarbons, especially when the prevailing belief is that hydrocarbons are assumed to be derived from buried biomass on earth. A warm day there is around -179 degrees Celsius. Not the sort of place to expect life to form. Hardly a place where the entire planet is composed of hydrocarbons due to biomass.

    To put Titan into perspective; Titan has hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth, scientists report. A satellite smaller than earth with no observed life, has more oil than earth?

    Does this mean that there are carbon-based life-forms on Titan? Surely not, so how on earth are these hydrocarbons being formed. In fact the researchers are concentrating their work on how life evolved from these "organic" compounds, implying that the "oil" produced life, not the other way round.

    Look at the Russian model, they've had it right for a long time now. The Russians are hardly given to follow PC thnking

    Nearly all the oil wells in the US are capped as they were long ago thought to have been pumped dry. These caps and wells are checked regularly. The dirty little secret is that that are refilling. Many are back up to capacity. Perish the thought if the big oil companies made that knowledge public. Prices would drop overnight. You'll find scarce evidence regarding this for that very reason.

    In one early case, it was made public. It caused a great deal of interest and suddenly the story was buried.

    That would be the story of Eugene Island 330.

    More on Eugene Island

    Now some "experts" will tell us that Eugene Island is just a once on the planet happenstance, but really now, what else could they say?

    Dwindling Oil Unfounded

    Peak Oil Debunked

    Peak Oil Scam

    Abiotic Petrolem

    Timing of "peak Oil"

    Fleecing the Sheep

    More on abiotic Oil

    Origins of petroleum


    I have many, many more documents in my library of peak oil myths.

    Several have been removed from the net, no surprise there, and while I could post them in their entirety, it would be a very long post. Nearly a book in itself.

    You can do your own due diligence and decide on your own. I've never been one to buy into the herd mentality and have studied this subject for many years.

    To keep this on gold(which was part of the OP's topic) and precious metals, $30 silver is in the cards shortly, $1200 gold will be on us soon and $1650 could be here by year's end, silver should be around $35 at around that same time. However, not before we have one more large shake down and prices drop hard. it will scare many away, but for most of us, it will be a buying opportunity as the rabbits run. That time is coming towards us quickly, very quickly, IMO.

    OK, I could go on, but this is a long enough and should give you ample reading along with enough links to continue your research.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • Options
    pf70collectorpf70collector Posts: 6,841 ✭✭✭
    Deadhorse good post. However, even with an endless supply of oil, we still have to change our energy policy world-wide because of global warming. I believe we won't last another 50 years if we don't. I will be long gone by then though.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file