Home U.S. Coin Forum

Update on auction MS67 std 25 & our fave 1821 SP67 50c

roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
colorful 1877 NGC MS67 quarter

I had sold this coin at FUN and was surprised to see it so quickly consigned to the March ANA sale. The coin was no doubt dipped when orig holdered back in the early 1990's and probably toned this interesting way in the holder. It didn't change all that much while in my possession. My guess is that either the coin was flipped to Heritage or the dealer I sold it to felt it could do much better in auction. It will be a good gauge for me on whether everything in the future should be going to auction. I had owned this coin for about 8 yrs or so. I believe I picked it up from Teletrade. The same dealer also purchased a MS66 NGC 1874-s 25c and that too is in this upcoming auction.

roadrunner
Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold

Comments

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks like a very sharp and flashy coin, but the toning pattern is not to my taste. What the heck, I am currently the high bidder. image
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin was no doubt dipped when orig holdered back in the early 1990's and probably toned this interesting way in the holder.

    Looks like it was retoned well before being holdered...
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would disagree with this being toned like this when it was first slabbed. It has the look of being toned in the holder, esp the odd way the toning is laid on with the obv top (nearest the grading insert) being the most heavily toned....and much less on the reverse.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would disagree with this being toned like this when it was first slabbed. It has the look of being toned in the holder, esp the odd way the toning is laid on with the top (nearest the grading insert) being the most heavily toned.

    I'm looking at a new non-soap bar NGC holder and see the line between the label and coin. However there's an Inch of space between them and no sulfer content in the insert lable... sorry just really hard for me to grasp image

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sorry roadrunner... TomB just set me straight with a lengthy explanation.

    Very Interesting!!!image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • I have no doubt it toned in the old NGC fatty holder.....classic color associated with the label being sealed in the same compartment as the coin...image
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seated quarters are in demand and doing very well at auction. Not surprised to see it turnover quickly.
    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    can you ask tomb if you can share his info that he passed onto you broadstruck?

    curious minds wish to know :-)
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,645 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It looks like a very sharp and flashy coin, but the toning pattern is not to my taste. What the heck, I am currently the high bidder. image >>



    Three whole dollars. RYK lives dangerously image


  • << <i>It looks like a very sharp and flashy coin, but the toning pattern is not to my taste. What the heck, I am currently the high bidder. image >>



    Watch out for that buyer's premium. It is currently three times your bid amount! But don't worry, you have six months to pay.image
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,888 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't care a whole lot for the toning pattern, either, but neither do I exactly hate it.

    MS67 in a Seated quarter sure as heck is worth of some respect.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    So you sold this in a private transaction to a dealer?

    It will be fun to see how it sells minus fees compared to what you got. I would also like to see which method to use in the future.

    I am with the others, I don't find the toning attractive but I don't dislike it either.
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    While the toning on this may not be to everyone's liking it consistently caught the eye of dealer's I showed it to in year's past. It is definitely eye-catching whether you like it or not. It was one of the first coins I sold at FUN on set-up day and the dealer did not even bat an eye or make a counter. That's one of the reasons I show material to a small group of no-nonsense buyers who either pass or play. If the coin works for them it's gone instantly. No "would takes a little less" etc. In fact I didn't deliver this coin to that dealer until the next morning and someone else was trying to buy it before I got it put safely away. I received what I felt was strong money for it though it's very possible I left another 5-10% on the "wholesale" table. It could most certainly fetch over $5K at the auction. But I don't think it will fetch what solid PCGS 67's have been bringing ($6-7K at times). But you never know. And the toning and flash could be enough to ignite the 2 potential buyers needed for a great price.

    roadrunner

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    can you ask tomb if you can share his info that he passed onto you broadstruck?

    Here ya go... wanted to ask permission first! image

    Several believe that the old NGC holders helped to tone the coins that were inside of the holders. This is especially true for coins that had been dipped and not properly neutralized prior to certification. Typically, the colors range from red through violet, but nearly all of the coins have a characteristic electric blue color somewhere on them. I could believe that this coin was dipped prior to certification and that it toned in the holder.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I viewed this coin at Baltimore. I like it. Very frosty and lustrous, and the toning is attractive, albeit different. Some chatter in the obverse device and a couple of small marks in the right obverse field keeps it from a full blown MS67 (I grade it a 66+), but I predict it will do extremely well in auction.
    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • I like the quality of the coin. I wonder about the pattern of untoned field to the right of Liberty. How do you think that came to be?
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Both of my former coins failed to score for their new owner at the Heritage sale. The 1877 25c NGC MS67 realized just over $5000. With the commish taken out, it sold for less than I got for it.

    The 1874-s 25c NGC MS66 did not sell against a reserve of $6000.
    That was a strong reserve and >$1000 what I had gotten for the coin. I think both coins did about what they should have.

    The 1821 SP67* CBH just met the $100,000 reserve and fetched
    $115,000 with the seller's 2nd fee (ie "buyer's" fee). That probably made Kevin Lipton and whatever partners he may have had, very happy. The rest of the prices in seated and bust seemed about par for the course. This sale had the flavor of mostly dealer coins.
    The 1859 old holder NGC PF65 25c with wonderful album toning fetched 66+ money at over $10,000. That was no surprise as it looked wonderful in the close up photos. Low end junk brought low end prices as demonstrated by a conserved NGC 1857 MS65 NM 25c at $2200l

    roadrunner

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1859 in NGC PR65 is a stunner and belongs in anybodys A box. The obverse clearly grades 66. The reverse has severe wipe marks above the eagles head, bothered me alot and offset the beauty of the coin. Even as a properly graded 65, I thought it was worthy of the bid it brought.

    The 1857 in NGC67 was also very attractive, but definately overgraded with alot of chatter on the arm and body of Liberty. It still brought a strong price at $8,600.

    The 1864 in NGC PR68 is about as original as you can get, it has never been messed with. It is very attractive, although not an A type stunner that I graded 67+. It brought strong money at $37,375.

    The 1890 in NGC PR66 was also an attractive piece that showed faint signs of a long ago wiping, but since well hidden by attractive toning. A solid 66+ coin that I thought would have brought a little bit more than a decent price of $3162, but it is a more common date.
    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ronyahski,

    I got 2 very expensive lessons in "acceptable wipes and chatter" when I sold my NGC PF68 1890 half (ex-Kaufman) and my 1849 PCGS MS64+ ogh quarter. The half had a good series of wipes on the lower reverse that bothered the heck out of me. I seriously felt that if I resumbitted in to PCGS it would have been downgraded.
    Yet when resumbitted by its next owner, it crossed and upgraded to CAM (which it really wasn't). I had tried selling that coin for 18 months and all I got was passes from all the major players...and no counter offers whatsoever. Then bingo, upgrade and it doubled in price at auction by going from a pop 24 to a pop 2 for type.

    The 1849 quarter had way too many chatter lines on the open reverse field - very standard for no motto seated quarters. The obverse was essentially gem though. While the coin was just a 64 it may have been given the upgrade nod due to it being so much finer than most or all of the other 64's (which it was). Now a pop 1 MS65 but in my mind still just a 64+ coin.

    Your summary of those Phoenix ANA coins only reinforces what we already know or have learned by hard knocks. Then again, we tend to be very critical on flaws. It's sort of odd that in 1988, a single obverse hairline across the major figure would have almost always downgraded a barber or seated coin to 64 status. Today, that only prevents a 68 grade. All else is possible based on luster and eye appeal. The tolerance for wipes and hairlines today is far different than 20 years ago. With the wipe you describe on that 1859 25c I would have knocked $3-5K off my bid. I have to think that the new owners of coins like that are counting on the fact that the wipe will be overlooked during the TPG grading process...or that the next potential buyer will miss it.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Clearly, somebody could have missed the problem with that 1859, or thought the look carrys the coin. These days, as you point out, eye appeal is king.

    I watch people on the bourse floor pick up a coin, look at the grade on the slab, flip it over for a quick look, decide that it's pretty, and buy it. Those people include some dealers. I just can't relate to that.
    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file