Home U.S. Coin Forum

(: My Liberty V Nickel Proof Set - MEGA PIX :)

Complete Proof Set from 1883 - 1912 and is mighty pretty to look at!
(thanks to Mark Goodman for the super photos)



Below are links to some of my other set threads:

Liberty V Nickel Set
Early Commemorative 50 Piece Set
Buffalo Nickel Type Set (MS & Proof)




-sm



image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image





Comments

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Loose the K as you need to change your user name to SpaceMoney! image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • TennesseeDaveTennesseeDave Posts: 4,809 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Super nice coins SpaceMonkey,I'll check back later to see if youv'e added any more.
    Trade $'s


  • << <i>Loose the K as you need to change your user name to SpaceMoney! image >>











    image








    -sm
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Keep the K as a first name... Kash Spacemoney has a nice ring to it! image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • speetyspeety Posts: 5,424
    Nice, we are slowly working on a PF65cam set....key word is slowly. image
    Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!

  • few more coins added... thanks MG!







    -sm
  • Great pictures and even greater coins.

    I'll bet they look amazing in hand.
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    Very nice, Space
    image
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,003 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sweet presentation.
  • RKKayRKKay Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭
    Very nice. How about a J-1690 to round it out?
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Wow, no words to describe how nice that looks.
  • tychojoetychojoe Posts: 1,336 ✭✭✭
    That is great collecting and great presentation. Beautiful.
  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kind of makes my Proof 64 set (in progress) look a little weak.....image
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    SM, now that's how coins should be presented.

    Nice collection and nice presentation image
  • Finally finished compositing all of the Photos Mark Goodman took for me... see first post for compete set... whew... that was a lot of work!





    -sm
  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭
    Great looking set there, Ed! Seems to be missing a 1913...... image

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    very impressive!
  • DoogyDoogy Posts: 4,508
    Super impressive there Ed, thanks for sharing those. Between your mastery of Photoshop coin templates, and Mark's photography, that makes for one stunning display!!

    Do you have those slabbed in multi-holders like your buffs?
  • pennyanniepennyannie Posts: 3,929 ✭✭✭
    Very nice set. I personally like your 1895 and 1912. Now i know who is ahead of me. I am number 9 over there (14mins) I show 90 percent complete minus the 13. Joined the collectors corner for the 5 free grades. and i need to send my raw ones in to be certified and added to show 100 percent. I have a chance to move to number 7 but no higher. How long did you spend building your set? How are your pics done? I am going to send in all my proofs in at the same time i send the raw ones in and have them all reholdered and cross over the few pcgs ones. I was planning on having NGC take the pics but i do not think they will look as nice as the way you have done yours. Those top 3 sets are serious money to me over there . Makes mine look like i had pocket change slabbed.image I have talked to NGC a couple of times to see if they will put my name on the holder if i have them all crossed and reholdered. I have never gotten a firm answer yet. Thanks for sharing you pics, it is nice to find another V-nickel proof collector.
    Mark
    NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
    working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!

    RIP "BEAR"
  • DoogyDoogy Posts: 4,508


    << <i>Very nice set. I personally like your 1895 and 1912. Now i know who is ahead of me. I am number 9 over there (14mins) I show 90 percent complete minus the 13. Joined the collectors corner for the 5 free grades. and i need to send my raw ones in to be certified and added to show 100 percent. I have a chance to move to number 7 but no higher. How long did you spend building your set? How are your pics done? I am going to send in all my proofs in at the same time i send the raw ones in and have them all reholdered and cross over the few pcgs ones. I was planning on having NGC take the pics but i do not think they will look as nice as the way you have done yours. Those top 3 sets are serious money to me over there . Makes mine look like i had pocket change slabbed.image I have talked to NGC a couple of times to see if they will put my name on the holder if i have them all crossed and reholdered. I have never gotten a firm answer yet. Thanks for sharing you pics, it is nice to find another V-nickel proof collector. >>



    Congrats on your set too! That must feel like a great accomplishment. FYI, I believe (as do others that have used their service) that NGC's photo service is strictly for those that intend to use the photos for insurance policy proof, and that sort of thing. They seem to use a flatbed scanner, and scan the whole slab. The pictures don't turn out that well, but they also only charge $3 each. For photographing proofs of this caliber, i'd also recommend Mark Goodman, Bob Campbell or Bruce Lee; all very nice forum members.

  • BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Outstanding! image
  • DD Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭
    Could be worse.

    -D

    image
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

    -Aristotle

    Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.

    -Horace
  • pennyanniepennyannie Posts: 3,929 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the info. My other thought was to go to the local camera store and see if i could find me a nice non professional willing to do it for practice and money.

    How long to complete set? Did you have a goal of 65's in mind? A budget? If so how did you do? I spent 2 years on mine (still need to change out 2 coins IMO) spent more than intended. I would have liked to gone 65's and better but my funds did not allow. I decided to go no lower than 63 cameo designated on the label. Most of mine are 64's. I sprinkled in a NGC 66, 67 and 2 PCGS 65's in the mix.The 63 cameos always seem as good or better than a lot of 64's to me. 85 percent of mine i bought the coin and not the holder, ( i had to do a lot of returning from ebay, mail order, catalog, DLRC and heritage when i could not always get proofs at the shows in person) feel some would upgrade. I went as tone free as possible on most.
    Mark
    NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
    working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!

    RIP "BEAR"
  • drddmdrddm Posts: 5,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AMAZING.......SIMPLY AMAZING!!!

    Congrats!!!
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,281 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How long to complete set? Did you have a goal of 65's in mind? A budget? If so how did you do? I spent 2 years on mine (still need to change out 2 coins IMO) spent more than intended. I would have liked to gone 65's and better but my funds did not allow. I decided to go no lower than 63 cameo designated on the label. Most of mine are 64's. I sprinkled in a NGC 66, 67 and 2 PCGS 65's in the mix.The 63 cameos always seem as good or better than a lot of 64's to me. 85 percent of mine i bought the coin and not the holder,

    SpaceMonkey, I'd be interested in knowing some of this as well. I've always liked this design, and your set is an amazing inspiration!
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.


  • << <i>How long to complete set? Did you have a goal of 65's in mind? A budget? If so how did you do? I spent 2 years on mine (still need to change out 2 coins IMO) spent more than intended. I would have liked to gone 65's and better but my funds did not allow. I decided to go no lower than 63 cameo designated on the label. Most of mine are 64's. I sprinkled in a NGC 66, 67 and 2 PCGS 65's in the mix.The 63 cameos always seem as good or better than a lot of 64's to me. 85 percent of mine i bought the coin and not the holder,

    SpaceMonkey, I'd be interested in knowing some of this as well. I've always liked this design, and your set is an amazing inspiration! >>






    This set goes back to 2006.... Goal was 65 or better... seems to be a nice divider line for me anyways... though, eye appeal is always on my mind. Budget... well... hummm.... next question.... image
    I would like to replace the 1885 one day as the carbon spot on the REV bugs me sometimes.




    -sm
  • When you throw the 1885 out, you can send it to me... beautiful set and well presented. Congratulations!image
    "College men from LSU- went in dumb, come out dumb too..."
    -Randy Newmanimage
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,281 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cost range, SM? Cost range? How hard is the set when you are fairly picky?
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • jmj3esqjmj3esq Posts: 5,421
    SpaceMonkey, you do have a one hell of a collection. Absolutley beautiful.


  • << <i>Cost range, SM? Cost range? How hard is the set when you are fairly picky? >>





    under $30k... at my grades.
    tough set to complete IMO... unless you open the checkbook wider for impatience image



    -sm

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file