1983-D cent...I think

Is this for real, like on experimental metal or maybe a foreign planchet? Or is it the result of someone having too much spare time on their hands and fooling around with it?
It belongs to a friend who got it back in the late 80's. It came through the convenience store as change. Taken under incandescent lighting...sorry, it doesn't have the yellowish tint that is showing in the pictures. AND...it is in a nickel holder so it is quite a bit larger than a normal cent. The metal looks like hammered aluminum to me. Give me your thoughts...


It belongs to a friend who got it back in the late 80's. It came through the convenience store as change. Taken under incandescent lighting...sorry, it doesn't have the yellowish tint that is showing in the pictures. AND...it is in a nickel holder so it is quite a bit larger than a normal cent. The metal looks like hammered aluminum to me. Give me your thoughts...


If you don't know where you're going, you'll end up somewhere else.


0
Comments
greg
www.brunkauctions.com
The name is LEE!
greg
www.brunkauctions.com
Thanks, but do you have any other suggestion. In the center of Wyoming, there are no local coin dealers. The nearest one is probably 250 miles away. Maybe I better buy a scale...
<< <i> wondering if you can show a pic of it beside a normal lincoln cent so we can get an idea of how big it is.......does the planchet seem thinner >>
It is thin...thinner than I would think it should be for the size. It doesn't feel right...light and thin for the diameter of the 'coin.' I put it in the nickel holder myself to give you an idea of the size. He had it in a plastic baggie. The color truly looks like that of the old hammered aluminum cooking pots from the old days.
they will lose their copper coating somehow and look similar to the
43 cents.
<< <i> If you take post 82 cents and put them on a hot plate long enough >>
But does it explain the size? The strike is good on all devices and lettering, nothing blurred or stretched. It is just too big for a cent holder and fits quite nicely in a nickel holder. I'll try to find a way to get it weighed this week.
Updated photos, taken today
Anybody???
I did an experiment once with nitic acid and got results like that.
<< <i>But how would you account for the size? It looks cast to me. I also find it odd the the reverse legend tends to run into the rim. >>
I agree with the cast.
Al
<< <i>Looks like a cast coin >>
Please explain...I've no idea what a cast coin is or what the purpose for one would be...sorry
<< <i><< Looks like a cast coin >> >>
I am going to assume that 'cast' is not good?
Should I send it in for authentication then?
<< <i>
<< <i><< Looks like a cast coin >> >>
I am going to assume that 'cast' is not good?
Should I send it in for authentication then?
No! It's not good..Read this from CU........................A replication of a genuine coin usually created by making molds of the obverse and reverse, then casting base metal in the molds. A seam is usually visible on the edge unless it has been ground away.
Al
In conclusion, I do not think this is a product of the US mint. It's more likely someone was playing around and cast it from a mold.
if it is from the mint i kinda think it might be the chinese mint. jmo