Options
How about the labels next???
commoncardman
Posts: 126
When PSA decides it needs more money, how about having to resubmit the cards again to get the labels graded.
ORIOLES FOR TRADE
My 57 set
1957 O's team: Completed
1978 O's team: 71.4%
1980 O's team: 85.7%
1974 O's team: 74.2%
My 57 set
1957 O's team: Completed
1978 O's team: 71.4%
1980 O's team: 85.7%
1974 O's team: 74.2%
0
Comments
<< <i>When PSA decides it needs more money, how about having to resubmit the cards again to get the labels graded. >>
Nahh....Next will be new, more secure holders.
Jason
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
<< <i>
<< <i>When PSA decides it needs more money, how about having to resubmit the cards again to get the labels graded. >>
Nahh....Next will be new, more secure holders.
Jason >>
That should have been the focus this time, not a .5 grading scale.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>When PSA decides it needs more money, how about having to resubmit the cards again to get the labels graded. >>
Nahh....Next will be new, more secure holders.
Jason >>
That should have been the focus this time, not a .5 grading scale. >>
I agree...It's something that is NEEDED..The half grades will be an improvement, but honestly it wasn't something the collectors NEEDED. But the half grades will be a bigger money maker. New holders only cost $5, and I doubt many collectors would be willing to shell out thousands of dollars just for new holders. Its really something that only helps you when you are selling a card. If I own it, not selling it anytime soon, I could care less about a better holder. The cards are locked away in the safe as it is...lol
Jason
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.