1962 Topps PSA 9 Set

Wink · January 3, 2008 7:44AM

Check this out on ebay #250202684954. Should he be reported for using PSA in the description? Of course he has 0 feedback. Thanks.

qualitycards · January 3, 2008 8:39AM

Wink - Here's the link "1962 Topps PSA-9 set"

If this claim is true, the seller should submit them and make many many multiples of the asking price.

WinPitcher · January 3, 2008 9:15AM

Another ebay mutt making outlandish claims on the quality of his cards. All are PSA 9?

He may think so, but I highly doubt it.

Steve

bigred1 · January 3, 2008 11:20AM

Probably worth it if it is the "best set in world"

bigred1 · January 3, 2008 11:21AM

Thinking about bidding, dont really have time to travel the world to find a better condition set.

KalineFan · January 3, 2008 1:50PM

Just sent him a question and all I said was....
"SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM..." You get the picture!

HEH

TONY

Morgoth · January 4, 2008 6:59AM

Every card in his picture is OC except maybe the Koufax.

relaxed · January 4, 2008 9:25AM

He also has a 1960 Carl Yastrazemski that he has labeled as a PSA 9 on sale. Maybe he just needs some reading glasses.

nam812 · January 4, 2008 9:54AM

I don't think I can ever get enough of the cat in the lime helmet.

OAKESY25 · January 4, 2008 9:59AM

if this is what psa is grading 9's nowadays.. I have some serious work to do on a big fat bulk sub
this is his yaz "psa 9"

Bosox1976 · January 4, 2008 10:16PM

Sixes are the new nines. Hot 2008 trends!

WinPitcher · January 5, 2008 9:04AM

yes, i've cleared up the obvious on the auction site and added some new scans. they are psa 9, however i can't afford to have the whole set psa 9 GRADED

his reply to my question.

Steve

WinPitcher · January 5, 2008 9:13AM

You are bidding on a complete 1962 Topps set. All my cards are PSA 9 as they have all been stored properly for 30+ years until recentley being inherited. You will not find better condition 1962 Topps baseball cards anywhere in the world.

Please ask for any more or better quality scans, I will be happy to send them to you.

Good Luck Bidding :-)

On Jan-05-08 at 13:08:59 PST, seller added the following information:

I will still honor this auction and the highest bidder, however, i do not feel like answering any questions as I've realized how much more I could get for these cards through auction houses such as memory lane. Only highest bidder will see further scans. Sorry. Thanks

On Jan-05-08 at 13:23:37 PST, seller added the following information:

Obviously these cards have not been graded, however, a professional representative of a major auction house has told me they are mint and should be mailed to psa for their psa 9 grading. I'm not trying to fool anyone, however, if they were graded you could be paying as much as $1000 per card,

if your still interested send me your email address and I will give you detailed scans of these psa 9 quality cards.

What we call BS where I come from.

Steve

bigred1 · January 5, 2008 10:30AM

After looking at the new scans maybe he just means 9oc.

iamarock · January 5, 2008 2:08PM

Look at the upper right corner on the Mantle.

GDM67 · January 5, 2008 2:12PM

<< <i>Sixes are the new nines. >>

Now if six

Turned out to be nine

I don't mind

I don't mind.

Wink · January 7, 2008 12:21PM

Auction ended with no bids.......

mnstortuga · January 7, 2008 12:41PM

So my question is: What would everyone have paid for this auction IF the seller didn't mention PSA ? Although the pic's were awful, some of the cards looked good. In the end this guy butchered any chance to sell that set. What a fool.............

JonB · January 8, 2008 12:29AM

Well considering he has 0 feedback, I'd pay $0. The last time I bought from a seller with low feedback was several years ago and I got burned. Never again will I make that mistake, I don't care what the are selling or what the price is.

That being said, I'll stick with Steve's '62 set as being the nicest in the world.

mcross · January 8, 2008 1:16AM

1962 Topps PSA 9 Set

Comments