<< <i>PR70 - To the extent, PCGS' decision is partially being driven by"responsibility" to NOT create another valuable coin "label driven", I can certainly respect that position. Wondercoin >>
I see this as a good thing, but can't help thinking that I would have more respect for this decision had they excercised this same discretion LAST year and not made up bogus 10th anniv labels for the plat proofs... It's not their product to designate as such.
Eric
EAC member since 2011, one third of the way through my 1793 large cent type set
PCGS can't be pious and hypocritical at the same time.
“Responsibility” means not creating First Strike Labels for $1 Presidents on the day they are released to the FED for circulation while at the same time, the TRUE First Strike Coins (First Day Coin Covers) are not even recognized.
On BS&T Now: Nothing. Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up! Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
<< <i>Thanks Bear...I guess I must also make the walk to the otherside of the street....Damn shame for PCGS though....I have a whole closet full of mint sealed "premium stuff". At this rate, it's ALL going there....and I haven't ever submitted a single one there previously... >>
Does PCGS suck ? .....I have a PCGS GOLD REVERSE PROOF -70 PCGS SILVER REVERSE PROOF -70 a SOON to be NGC REVERSE PLAT PROOF ?
The folks at PCGS are pretty good at what they do,they will do the right thing, not to worry...........I'm spending my time trying to get more of these instead of worrying where there going if I get them...........I'm not a wise old Bear...........but you don't have to be on this one..........go gettum!
Comments
Camelot
<< <i>PR70 - To the extent, PCGS' decision is partially being driven by"responsibility" to NOT create another valuable coin "label driven", I can certainly respect that position. Wondercoin >>
I see this as a good thing, but can't help thinking that I would have more respect for this decision had they excercised this same discretion LAST year and not made up bogus 10th anniv labels for the plat proofs... It's not their product to designate as such.
Eric
“Responsibility” means not creating First Strike Labels for $1 Presidents on the day they are released to the FED for circulation while at the same time, the TRUE First Strike Coins (First Day Coin Covers) are not even recognized.
That Pig just doesn’t fly in my book.
Camelot
Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
<< <i>Thanks Bear...I guess I must also make the walk to the otherside of the street....Damn shame for PCGS though....I have a whole closet full of mint sealed "premium stuff". At this rate, it's ALL going there....and I haven't ever submitted a single one there previously... >>
Does PCGS suck ? .....I have a PCGS GOLD REVERSE PROOF -70
PCGS SILVER REVERSE PROOF -70
a SOON to be NGC REVERSE PLAT PROOF ?
The folks at PCGS are pretty good at what they do,they will do the right thing, not to worry...........I'm spending my time trying to get more of these instead of worrying where there going if I get them...........I'm not a wise old Bear...........but you don't have to be on this one..........go gettum!
Camelot
Box of 20