Complete type set stops at 1964?

JoeLewis · November 17, 2007 10:18AM

Why does the complete type set stop at 1964 instead of going to the present?

braddick · November 17, 2007 10:20AM

<< <i>Why does the complete type set stop at 1964 instead of going to the present? >>

Can you imagine what it would look like it it went to the present day?

JoeLewis · November 17, 2007 10:21AM

What do you mean? Too large?

Silverstate · November 17, 2007 4:51PM

But it WOULD be complete.

Presently it is a "Short Set"

ajia · November 18, 2007 12:07AM

What do you mean? Too large?

Currentlu PCGS distinguishes changes made witnin a series.
In other words, there's a Type I, II & II for the 3 Cent Silvers. A Type I & II for Buffalo nickels.
If you apply that to each SHQ, Prez dollars, & First Spouce and distinguish them as seperate types, then it would get quite large.
And who knows what the Mint has in store for us in the future.

JoeLewis · November 18, 2007 1:59AM

<< <i>What do you mean? Too large?

Currentlu PCGS distinguishes changes made witnin a series.
In other words, there's a Type I, II & II for the 3 Cent Silvers. A Type I & II for Buffalo nickels.
If you apply that to each SHQ, Prez dollars, & First Spouce and distinguish them as seperate types, then it would get quite large.
And who knows what the Mint has in store for us in the future. >>

Okay, so then stop at 1999.

Complete type set stops at 1964?

Comments

Categories