Guess the grade... Tricky one...

Comments

• tightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 1:10PM

  63 maybe a 64

  0
• ddbird Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 1:11PM

  63...weak strike not wear.
  
  That's a total shot in the dark...
  
  

  
  ">"http://www.cashcrate.com/5663377"

  0
• fivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 1:13PM

  Tricky huh?
  I'll say NGC misgraded it AU58.

  0
• mike92694 Posts: 1,068

  October 24, 2007 1:15PM

  I will go all in with 66

  0
• clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 1:17PM

  AU58

  0
• Bruceswar Posts: 2,869

  October 24, 2007 1:25PM

  So far we got AU 58 to MS 66... Would it help if I told you this was a No line Fatty?

  The Bruce Lee Collection
  
  
  

  0
• Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 1:28PM

  MS-65 nice.

  
  
  Hoard the keys.

  0
• DJCoinz Posts: 3,856 ✭

  October 24, 2007 2:36PM

  That is a tricky one...I'd say NGC graded it MS61.

  aka Dan

  0
• BigMoose Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 2:44PM

  MS 62

  TomT-1794
  
  Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org

  0
• NHSBaseball Posts: 2,470 ✭

  October 24, 2007 3:05PM

  AU55- I think there's rub on the buffalo's shoulder..

  "College men from LSU- went in dumb, come out dumb too..."
  -Randy Newman

  0
• lkenefic Posts: 8,581 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 3:08PM

  I'd say 58 as well...looks nice to me!!!

  Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
  
  Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.

  0
• Frankcoins Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 3:12PM

  Looks 63

  Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com

  0
• Bruceswar Posts: 2,869

  October 24, 2007 5:02PM

  
  
  << <i>I'd say 58 as well...looks nice to me!!! >>
  
  
  
  
  This coin looks really nice in hand

  The Bruce Lee Collection
  
  
  

  0
• ChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 7:13PM

  XF-40
  
  Next

  

  0
• PerryHall Posts: 46,862 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 8:04PM

  MS63 with a weak strike. Nice original coin.

  Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
  "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
  "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  0
• drwstr123 Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 8:11PM

  Nice coin. AU58.

  0
• Bruceswar Posts: 2,869

  October 24, 2007 8:51PM

  soo we got from XF 40 to MS 66... Nice spread going...

  The Bruce Lee Collection
  
  
  

  0
• cmerlo1 Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 9:12PM

  64

  You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

  0
• coinkat Posts: 23,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 9:32PM

  62

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0
• IRCWCoins Posts: 895 ✭✭

  October 24, 2007 10:20PM

  MS-64

  0
• Coinlearner Posts: 2,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 10:28PM

  AU-55, for my money.

  0
• partagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 10:40PM

  Should be graded 62

  If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?

  0
• Fairlaneman Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 11:17PM

  It would get 63 money from me. Nice look.
  
  Ken

  0
• icsoccer Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 11:18PM

  64
  

  Successful BST transactions to date: Coindeuce, Cohodk, dantheman984, STONE, LeeG, jy8s, jkal, SeaEagleCoins, Hyperion, silverman68,Meltdown,RichieURich,savoyspecial,Barndog
  

  0
• compromonedas Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2007 11:59PM

  58
  Keith

  0
• intocoins Posts: 602 ✭

  October 25, 2007 1:19AM

  62 , strike , luster and marks keep it from being any better. Does not appear to be any wear on coin.

  0
• Cnitas Posts: 373

  October 25, 2007 1:22AM

  Looks to be a very weak strike.... should be a MS61
  Maybe some rub or wear on the buff shoulder??

  Mark Piersall
  Random Collector
  www.marksmedals.com

  0
• TomB Posts: 22,090 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 25, 2007 3:35AM

  MS64.

  Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography
  
  In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
  
  

  0
• STONE Posts: 15,275 ✭

  October 25, 2007 3:37AM

  PO-01
  
  MS-63 is my guess; a stronger strike and I'd go 64

  0
• Bruceswar Posts: 2,869

  October 25, 2007 8:10AM

  For those of you who said MS 64 hit it right on the button. 1928 D is one of the worst struck date / mm for the buffalos. This one throws alot of people off.

  The Bruce Lee Collection
  
  
  

  0
• clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭

  October 25, 2007 1:04PM

  Is that a doubled die? Looks like there's doubling on the chin and neck. Probably just the light.

  0
• Bruceswar Posts: 2,869

  October 25, 2007 6:50PM

  
  
  << <i>Is that a doubled die? Looks like there's doubling on the chin and neck. Probably just the light. >>
  
  
  
  Took a closer look... Might be.. today we would call it Machine doubling? back then?? who knows. Cool at either rate.

  The Bruce Lee Collection
  
  
  

  0
• Boom Posts: 10,165 ✭

  October 25, 2007 7:06PM

  Ummm - NGC 64 IMHO.

  Boom's Retired Registry Set & Boom's Retired Variety Set
  

  0
• coinkat Posts: 23,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 25, 2007 9:39PM

  I agree that the quality for this date is not great... and 64 is about right. I was expecting a lower grade based more on the description of the holder... old NGC Fattie...

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0