Home U.S. Coin Forum

Life of modern coinage dies

Quite a while ago, someone asked how many coins were struck from modern dies. I posted some info on cent and nickel dies from 1909, but had nothing on more modern dies. The following were data located by chance. Although these numbers are 30 years old, they may still be relevant to specialists of various series, particularly Ike dollars.

Average die life as reported for April 1974, Philadelphia Mint.

Cent obv 554,832
Cent rev 485,777
Nickel obv 215,545
Nickel rev 165,042
Dime obv 125,566
Dime rev 207,694
Quart obv 256,080
Quart rev 294,250
Half obv 263,260
Half rev 278,459
Dol obv 256,128
Dol rev 63,988

I found numerous mention of this type of list in modern files, but this was the only example I could locate.

Comments

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There have been dramatic improvements in die steels in the last
    third of a century. This has led to much improved die life. Also the
    composition change of the cent and lowering of designs has im-
    proved die life.

    The quarter numbers are fairly accurate again because the states
    issues are obsolete about the time they get them debugged.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And here's something else to take into account;

    The planchet’s size, hardness, design intricacy, and relief determine the force needed to strike. Golden Dollar coins require the greatest force, and pennies require the least force.

    So the idea that every denomination is not struck the same makes it somewhat difficult to come to some conclusion of some sort when comparing the numbers.


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection



  • << <i>Quite a while ago, someone asked how many coins were struck from modern dies. I posted some info on cent and nickel dies from 1909, but had nothing on more modern dies. The following were data located by chance. Although these numbers are 30 years old, they may still be relevant to specialists of various series, particularly Ike dollars.

    Average die life as reported for April 1974, Philadelphia Mint.

    Cent obv 554,832
    Cent rev 485,777
    Nickel obv 215,545
    Nickel rev 165,042
    Dime obv 125,566
    Dime rev 207,694
    Quart obv 256,080
    Quart rev 294,250
    Half obv 263,260
    Half rev 278,459
    Dol obv 256,128
    Dol rev 63,988

    I found numerous mention of this type of list in modern files, but this was the only example I could locate. >>





    RWB, was referred to your thread. As an Ike researcher I am really interested in "Dol rev 63,988", a very strange number, and wondered if you could double check it?

    Even better, could you share the source with me?

    The Ike Group is trying to get a handle on the use and impact of the "tougher" die steel available in '72 and possibly/probably used for the 1972-S BS Silver and 1972 T3 Ikes produced late in '72, and of course for all subsequent Ikes.

    Any input would be most appreciated. Rob
    Modern dollars are like children - before you know it they'll be all grown up.....

    Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    I find those numbers intriguing since the numbers for dollars quoted by Howard F. Johnson - Chief, Assay Laboratories in a letter to Russell Rulau of Coin World, dated July 24th, 1972 tauted:

    100,000 obverse
    120,000 reverse

    I was under the impression that the harder steel was to extend die life, not shorten it as was accomplished for the reverse dies. (from 120,000 down to 63,988).
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    The quantities were only for April, and might not have been typical.
  • pb2ypb2y Posts: 1,461
    Working dies once had about the same life span
    as the bore on a Springfeild 06 and M1 Garand.
    About 50/75 thousand rounds max -- coincidence??
    image

  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    In 1878 standard dollar dies started out running about 50,000 pieces, which Morgan thought was great based on his Royal Mint background. However, by the 1880s, dollar dies were smashing out 250,000+ and at times up to 500,000.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,747 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i><STRONG>Working dies once had about the same life span
    as the bore on a Springfeild 06 and M1 Garand.
    About 50/75 thousand rounds max -- coincidence??</STRONG> >>




    Mostly.

    I would think that there would be exceptionally little wear
    from the bullet in a properly funtioning firearm and that most
    of the wear and tear would be erosion caused by the rapid-
    ly expanding and burning powder.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    ModernDollarNut -
    PM sent in response to your note. I can send you a PDF of the original document as soon as I have your email.


  • << <i>ModernDollarNut -
    PM sent in response to your note. I can send you a PDF of the original document as soon as I have your email. >>



    RWB, thanks. I just checked and my PM was turned off so your PM didn't get through, sorry.

    Email address is doctortrucker@aol.com (it's being published in The Numismatist, why not here?). Rob
    Modern dollars are like children - before you know it they'll be all grown up.....

    Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
  • Congratulations Lee on getting those numbers right.

    "I find those numbers intriguing since the numbers for dollars quoted by Howard F. Johnson - Chief, Assay Laboratories in a letter to Russell Rulau of Coin World, dated July 24th, 1972 tauted:

    100,000 obverse
    120,000 reverse"

    An interesting thing happened to that reverse die life number.

    When Coin World printed the article, a typo of 200,000 for 1971 dollar reverse die life snuck in. That's 1.

    Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine evidently copied it. That's 2.

    Walter Breen Encylcopedia used NSM as his source. That's 3.

    Dave Bowers Silver Dollar Encyclopedia used Breen as his source. That's 4.
  • On further reflection, I realize that at this time I am not sure where the typo occurred and who made it. I have Breen's book and a first edition of Bowers. The 1971 dollar reverse die life is incorrect in those two. The NSM article I never saw and the Coin World one I can not say at this point. It could be Breen's book where it first occurred.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file