Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Jayson Stark's Overrated List

I just picked up his recent book re the most overrated players of all time. I have resisted the urge to look at each position. I must say that the three choices I have seen would at least be on my short list of most overrated.

RHP-Ryan
LHP-Koufax
1B-Garvey

Comments

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    I never would have thought that two of the most dominating and intimidating pitchers of their time would be considered the most overrated.

    But hey, that's why people have opinions.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    I am sure statistics will be used and misused to prove his points. I am a scientist but endless pontification of stats really get's old in a sport where lucky bounces and fractions of inches determines some of those stats (especially wins and loses).
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set


  • << <i>I just picked up his recent book re the most overrated players of all time. I have resisted the urge to look at each position. I must say that the three choices I have seen would at least be on my short list of most overrated.

    RHP-Ryan
    LHP-Koufax
    1B-Garvey >>



    I would have to seriously question the basis by which any of these three players could be considered overrated. Ryan and Koufax, especially Koufax, dominated the game. Garvey's statistics may not be worthy of the Hall of Fame but if you were there and watched him play and saw what he meant to his team he would never be on a list like this. Depending on your point of view though I suppose Phil Niekro, Dale Murphy, and Chipper Jones could also all be on this list. That wouldn't make you too popular in Atlanta though.
    Learn some history of the game. Join a vintage base ball team in your area and get out there.
    Simsbury Taverneers
    My PSA Sets
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    $51 million, 19 wins total 23 losses for 2 years in colorado!!!!

    denny neagle

    yikes
    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • drewsefdrewsef Posts: 1,894 ✭✭
    anyone that considers Koufax overrated doesn't have a clue IMO
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 31,783 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>anyone that considers Koufax overrated doesn't have a clue IMO >>



    Agreed
  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    Koufax's peak value was tremendous, but his peak was quit short. If I had a choice between having either Koufax or Spahn for my team, I would take Spahn in a heartbeat. You would be a a little better for five years, I would be a lot better for the next fifteen.
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 31,783 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would take Spahn as well, 363 wins is a tremendous accomplishment.
  • drewsefdrewsef Posts: 1,894 ✭✭


    << <i>Koufax's peak value was tremendous, but his peak was quit short. If I had a choice between having either Koufax or Spahn for my team, I would take Spahn in a heartbeat. You would be a a little better for five years, I would be a lot better for the next fifteen. >>



    and who has more world series rings? yeah, I'll take Koufax
  • artistlostartistlost Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭
    << I just picked up his recent book re the most overrated players of all time. I have resisted the urge to look at each position. I must say that the three choices I have seen would at least be on my short list of most overrated.

    RHP-Ryan
    LHP-Koufax
    1B-Garvey >>

    Sometimes i wonder if people actually even watch baseball with some of the comments i read. Hell let's put Manlte up on that list...maybe Jackie Robinson...and while we're at it...i really think we should vote Julio Franco into the Hall...i mean he peaked for 10 years and is still playing after 20+ years

    This is why i don't drink in the afternoon anymore...

    mathew
    baseball & hockey junkie

    drugs of choice
    NHL hall of fame rookies
  • jamesryanbelljamesryanbell Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I just picked up his recent book re the most overrated players of all time. I have resisted the urge to look at each position. I must say that the three choices I have seen would at least be on my short list of most overrated.

    RHP-Ryan
    LHP-Koufax
    1B-Garvey >>



    Yeah, two of the most dominating pitchers of all-time. Sure, they'd make my list. [/sarcasm]

    Disclaimer: I'm VERY well aware of both pitchers stats, and I know why people would say this. I know how many HRs Ryan allowed, how many walks he had etc. BUT....consider:

    7 no hitters
    5300+ strikeouts
    300+ wins
    383k's in a single season
    etc, etc, etc

    Overrated? No.
    -- Ryan Bell
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    Um rings are a team accomplishment not just one player. If Spahn and Koufax switched teams it would not have changed how many WS rings each team earned in my opinion if you adjusted for them playing at their peak (Spahn was a little past his prime when Koufax was winning).
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
  • Kid4hof03Kid4hof03 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It might be helpful to actually read the book before launching into big arguments. I thought the book was pretty well done, it wasn't overly statistical and made some great arguments. His constant point was that being overrated didn't necessarily mean that the player was garbage just not as great as they are remembered. His big point with Ryan is that he is considered by most people of my generation (30-40) to be one of the greatest pitchers of all time. The fact is that he wasn't the best pitcher of his time much less all time. Seaver and Carlton were clearly better. Nolan Ryan and Tom Seaver (I believe) hold the record for the highest hall of fame voting percentage, is he really deserving of that accomplishment? First ballot hall of famer, yes; great pitcher, of course; but I believe his legend has become a bit larger than he truly was.
    Collecting anything and everything relating to Roger Staubach
  • TreetopTreetop Posts: 1,474
    RHP-Ryan
    LHP-Koufax
    1B-Garvey


    When it comes to Jason Stark and his east coast favoritism, it doesn't surprise me that all 3 of these players spent there playing days predominately on the west coast.
    Link to my current Ebay auctions

    "If I ever decided to do a book, I've already got the title-The Bases Were Loaded and So Was I"-Jim Fregosi
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    Mark -


    Great point about Stark. His regular shilling for all things New York, Boston, and Philadelphia causes me to vomit in my mouth on occasion. But at least he's given up trying to make his voice sound exactly like Peter Gammons, which was his bit a few years ago.


    Ron
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • TreetopTreetop Posts: 1,474
    Jayson Stark and Ken Rosenthal (Fox). Can't decide who is the bigger buffoon. I won't even read there trash anymore
    Link to my current Ebay auctions

    "If I ever decided to do a book, I've already got the title-The Bases Were Loaded and So Was I"-Jim Fregosi
  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    Ryan has the lowest winning % of any 300 game winner.
  • TreetopTreetop Posts: 1,474
    Ryan has the lowest winning % of any 300 game winner.

    Big Deal. Jason is crunching numbers against the best of the best.

    Ryan was the most dominate pitcher I ever saw in 40 years of going to games. He could still hit 98/100 MPH after thowing 130 pitches. When he was on his game. He just flat out blew hitters away like nobody else could. I saw him toss a one hitter once. Second/third guy up on the Bosox got a bleeder of a single and that was it for the game. At one point he struck out 9 batters in a row. Nobody could touch him
    Link to my current Ebay auctions

    "If I ever decided to do a book, I've already got the title-The Bases Were Loaded and So Was I"-Jim Fregosi
  • RedHeart54RedHeart54 Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭


    << <i>$51 million, 19 wins total 23 losses for 2 years in colorado!!!! >>



    I'd completely forgotten about Denny Neagle! If someone asked me that as a trivia question I'd have guessed David Nied or Mike Hampton.


    With regards to Nolan Ryan, I have a book that's 20 years old called "Baseball Confidential" which was a book of of responses of surveys passed out to major leaguers at the time. Their most feared hitter? You guessed it. To quote Whitey Herzog, "Nolan has more effect on a team than any other opposing pitcher. That's because the players think about facing him the day before he pitches, the day he pitches, and the day after he pitches. On Monday they say 'Oh shi*, Ryan is pitching on Tuesday.' On Tuesday they say, "Oh shi*, look at his fastball.' And on Wednesday they say, 'Wow, did you see how fast he was?"
  • Since we're talking overrated and bad contracts I can throw out two Dodger names that belong on those lists. First, my overrated Dodger pitcher has to be Don Sutton. Sure he was good, but a Hall of Famer? It just goes to show you how much 300 wins was worth, even then.

    As for bad contracts. The Dodgers have the Rockies beat in a landslide. The following stats cost the Dodgers 5 years and $57 million dollars. 9 wins and 15 losses.

    Year Ag Tm Lg W L G GS CG SHO GF SV IP H R ER HR BB SO HBP WP BFP IBB BK ERA *lgERA *ERA+ WHIP
    +--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+----+-----+
    2001 29 LAD NL 4 7 16 16 0 0 0 0 94.7 89 62 54 11 47 91 6 10 416 0 0 5.13 4.01 78 1.437
    2002 30 LAD NL DID NOT PLAY
    2003 31 LAD NL 4 4 10 10 0 0 0 0 60.3 58 29 27 6 25 67 0 3 261 0 1 4.03 4.03 100 1.376
    2004 32 LAD NL 1 4 60 0 0 0 9 1 50.7 43 25 25 5 36 63 0 5 227 2 0 4.44 4.14 93 1.559
    2005 33 LAD NL DID NOT PLAY

    Surely he must have earned that money before he signed the big contract, right? Sure, 39 Wins and 45 losses in 6 years.

    Of course this is the infamous Darren Dreifort. He really proved the Moneyball theory of drafting college pitchers rather than high school players. He was d=rafted right after some kid named Alex Rodriguez.
    Learn some history of the game. Join a vintage base ball team in your area and get out there.
    Simsbury Taverneers
    My PSA Sets
  • JackWESQJackWESQ Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭
    Re: Koufax, from 1962 to 1966 (5 years), he was likely the best pitcher in baseball. From 1955 to 1961 (7 years), he was just another pitcher in baseball. Do we acknowledge the good and ignore the bad/average?

    /s/ JackWESQ
    image
  • thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    hmmm. Aren't we allowed to be aware of Koufax's dominance AND his mediocrity and still revere him? Some of us don't value longevity and consistency as much as we value off the charts brilliance in short spurts. Who is correct? Who is the arbitor of which characteristics are most important?

    And anyone who has pitched in any sort of organized baseball league for any length of time as a starter.......the discussion about Nolan begins and ends at the number 7. Every time you step out on that mound, you want to get everyone out. If you get everyone out, they can't win. If you get everyone out, you have shown the maximum amount of dominance on that day. If you get everyone out, you could not have helped your team out more. Pitchers...back me up here! When that first hit would happen and you lost the possibility of the no-hitter, you die a little bit. That is what being a competitor is all about.

    If you turn those seven no-hitters into one-hitters, he's still an awesome pitcher, historically. But those seven no-hitters are for real, and that makes him legendary in THAT sense. I'm not sure anyone would argue that he was the all around best pitcher ever considering all factors. But so what? That doesn't make him any less legendary. These guys are remembered for wowing people. These are the guys the little kids imitate when they throw balls against the brick wall. That is worth something.

    If you are all about greatness over time, maybe Koufax and Ryan don't measure up. Pedro will be thought of the same way, probably. But to be called "overrated"?!?? I don't know. It seems so relative to me. Once we all agree on the definitions of all things, maybe then we can talk about who is rated where and whether they deserve that spot or not. In the meantime, I'll rate the guys who wowed me the highest.

    ...and don't even get me started on wins. What kid is out there right now, pitching against a wall, doing the play by play, and imagining that he is being pulled after 6 and two thirds innings with a 6-4 lead. Who celebrates that? Wins are nice, but they are a team stat.
  • "and who has more world series rings? yeah, I'll take Koufax"

    thats a ridiculous statement. Spahn was one of the greatest players of all time. Rings are a reflection of the whole team, not just one person. Perfect example:

    Barry Bonds has no rings, Dave Justice does.
    Ill take Diamond Dave! Seeing things a bit clearer now?
  • It's about helping the team win, not intimidation. Never even the best pitcher in the league. And all those walks means there are close to 20 pitchers who did more to help their team win than Ryan

    Koufax had the greatest five year stretch in history. Yet there are a few pitchers in history who had five years at the top of the league. Plus at least another decade of being very good. Maybe not even the best pitcher of his generation
    Tom
  • drewsefdrewsef Posts: 1,894 ✭✭


    << <i>"and who has more world series rings? yeah, I'll take Koufax"

    thats a ridiculous statement. Spahn was one of the greatest players of all time. Rings are a reflection of the whole team, not just one person. Perfect example:

    Barry Bonds has no rings, Dave Justice does.
    Ill take Diamond Dave! Seeing things a bit clearer now? >>



    you really figured that one out didn't you. My comment was intended to be as most of my posts, sarcastic. Spahn at his best was no Sandy Koufax, just ask former players or people who watched both.
  • RedHeart54RedHeart54 Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Of course this is the infamous Darren Dreifort. He really proved the Moneyball theory of drafting college pitchers rather than high school players. >>



    To be fair, Dreifort had a lot of arm troubles that he was never able to get over. His talent was undeniable and he will always be one of the best pitchers to have played for Wichita State.
  • gumbyfangumbyfan Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭


    << <i>$51 million, 19 wins total 23 losses for 2 years in colorado!!!!

    denny neagle

    yikes
    j >>



    julen forgot to mention:

    1 hooker (at least)
  • Ryan is no HOF'er, just struck out a lot of guys

    Koufax was 40-42 after his 1st 5 yrs in the bigs

    then had 6 super yrs........6 great yrs is not a HOF'er in my opinion.........

    take any HOF'er & compare their best 6 yrs to Koufax's......I don't know if he will be near the top

    if arthritis didn't curtail his career no doubt he would have put up a monster career

    & for Garvey, once I was having a conversation with reggie jackson in the mid 80's & we were discussing who was going into the Hall down the road, I mentioned Garvey & Reggie laughed & said in NO uncertain terms NO way he's going to Cooperstown unless he buys a ticket at the admission window...good player but NOT HOF calibre, one of dozens of solid players who will be discussed for Cooperstown but NEVER EVER get in

    The big problem with baseball fans is they think anyone they like should be a HOF'er like a Roger maris

    A HOF'er has to play a minimum of ten yrs & has to be the best of his era

  • Ryan may not have been a true all-time great pitcher. But the strikeouts and the no-hitters made him one of the most famous

    Koufax won three unanimous Cy Young awards when they only gave one out to the entire league. How many pitchers in history were that much better than anyone else three times? Maybe Martinez at his best, maybe Grove or Walter Johnson, possibly Maddux. No one else. Then consider that Koufax still had three other All-Star seasons. Then four other years where he still helped the Dodgers. The Hall-of-Fame has inducted plenty of players who did less over an equally short time. Sandberg didn't give the Cubs much more than 10 years. Kiner and Hack Wilson. Dizzy Dean and Don Drysdale made the Hall-of-Fame

    The real test for Koufax is that there is not a single pitcher not in the Hall-of-Fame that did more to help their team win. Bert Blyleven makes a case that the same can't be said about Ryan. But he falls well short on the Fame side
    Tom


  • << <i>A HOF'er has to play a minimum of ten yrs & has to be the best of his era >>



    So only one player from each era is allowed to be in the Hall-of-Fame, according to this?

    I don't think the Hall-of-Fame has ever worked like that

    Considering Morgan, Schmidt, Yastrzemski, Seaver, Brett, Yount, and Rose, I doubt even Reggie Jackson could be considered the best of his era. Yet all of them are from the same generation and all of them are in the Hall-of-Fame (along with Palmer, Perry, Carlton, Carew. . . ) Koufax played for longer than 10 years and was absolutely no worse than the third best pitcher of his era, and more likely first or second
    Tom
  • DarinDarin Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ryan was a great thrower. Tom Seaver, Jim Palmer, and Steve Carlton, who are all from Ryan's era, were great pitchers and were way more valuable in helping their teams win games than Ryan ever was. Nolan is way overrated, isn't he about the losingest pitcher of all time, except for maybe Cy Young who won over 500?
  • DarinDarin Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If Ryan was so great, and he was a starter for 20+ years, its a remarkable accomplishment that he managed to avoid winning a single Cy Young award all those years.
  • larryallen73larryallen73 Posts: 6,069 ✭✭✭
    If Stark says Garvey, Ryan and Koufax are overrated I will turn to xm 142 each time he starts blabbing on xm 140 for now on. How is Garvey overrated? He is not in the HOF and never will be. He was just a GREAT all around player who just about every kid (like me) who grew up in LA in the 70's liked. So maybe he really wasn't Mr. Clean, in the end, but he was still a very dominate and extremely STEADY player for a long time. As for Koufax and Ryan, that's just stupid. If you rip the stats apart enough you can say anybody is overrated.
    P.S. Why is some new guy using Stone's picture thing next to his name? I don't think that's right.
  • Overrated or underrated is not about ripping apart stats. It is about understanding the players place in history.

    I did pay $500 to have that picture tattooed on my leg. If it's not right, it will be changed -- the digital picture, not the tattoo
    Tom
Sign In or Register to comment.