Options
More errors - more thoughts???
skippy315
Posts: 44
Hello again everyone...
I have found a few more errors...these are all on Lincoln cents (various years) - thoughts? The pics that are touching are the same coin (OBV/REV).
Thanks,
Kevin
I have found a few more errors...these are all on Lincoln cents (various years) - thoughts? The pics that are touching are the same coin (OBV/REV).
Thanks,
Kevin
0
Comments
Thanks for you help...
The one with the weak reverse is probably a weak strike or clogged die.
The 63-D with the bulge below liberty looks like some sort of planchet lamination error (that bulged but didn't peel off) from what the picture looks like.
The 61 with the 1 damaged is probably post mint damage from a coin counter or roll crimping machine.
That 53-D with reeding might be post mint, you might look close on the other side, see if the rim is smashed. If it is it might have been smashed with a reeded edge coin. If not see if anyone else has seen something like it. I've never seen anything like that. Maybe someone else has?
<< <i>The 45 and 47 are planchet lamination errors.
The one with the weak reverse is probably a weak strike or clogged die.
The 63-D with the bulge below liberty looks like some sort of planchet lamination error (that bulged but didn't peel off) from what the picture looks like.
The 61 with the 1 damaged is probably post mint damage from a coin counter or roll crimping machine.
That 53-D with reeding might be post mint, you might look close on the other side, see if the rim is smashed. If it is it might have been smashed with a reeded edge coin. If not see if anyone else has seen something like it. I've never seen anything like that. Maybe someone else has?
I agree
1955 no.1: die deterioration
1955 no.2: tapered planchet, most likely
1955 no.3: die deterioration
1953-D: encased or lucky token cent; not an error
1947: lamination error
1945: lamination error
1961: damage from a coin-wrapping machine
1953: damage from a coin-wrapping machine
It could have been in one of those ad tokens, when they sealed it that made the reeding. Good thought!
<< <i>1963-D: not sure
1955 no.1: die deterioration
1955 no.2: tapered planchet, most likely
1955 no.3: die deterioration
1953-D: encased or lucky token cent; not an error
1947: lamination error
1945: lamination error
1961: damage from a coin-wrapping machine
1953: damage from a coin-wrapping machine >>
Not that this person needs any backing up but he has them all correct in my opinion. The one with the "reeding" was in the center of a ring at one time as part of an encased cent.
The one that really has a small amount of value is the one that was struck on the tapered planchet. Maybe $5.00 or so.
lamination errors can also be called delamination errors...
Thanks,
Bill
myurl http://www.foundinrolls.com
<< <i>
lamination errors can also be called delamination errors...
Thanks,
Bill >>
You are technically correct. I'm not even sure if "lamination" is a real word. "Laminated" simply means layered. Delamination means a layer peeling off. But error hobbyists have never been known for their grammatical exactitude.
--Christian
<< <i>
<< <i>
lamination errors can also be called delamination errors...
Thanks,
Bill >>
You are technically correct. I'm not even sure if "lamination" is a real word. "Laminated" simply means layered. Delamination means a layer peeling off. But error hobbyists have never been known for their grammatical exactitude. >>
I know:-) One of my aims in life, my reason for being, my all consuming passion.....(Ok...that's got more ham in it than a can of Krakus polish ham) as an error and variety nut include my attempts to educate folks on the words that get used incorrectly such as , double die for doubled die, and lamination for delamination etc.
I will go on record though as saying It doesn't bother me if someone calls a cent a penny:-)
Have Fun,
Bill
myurl http://www.foundinrolls.com