What is a error coin?
Someone told me that a die crack coin isn't a error coin, i had always thought die crack coins were errors
Am i wrong to think this or not
could someone please clear this little question up so i can understand better the term error coin and what type of errors are considered offically errors and which ones aren't
Am i wrong to think this or not
could someone please clear this little question up so i can understand better the term error coin and what type of errors are considered offically errors and which ones aren't
1996,1997,2000
0
Comments
Otherwise, my best stab as a definition of an error coin is "A coin that has been released into circulation by the U.S. Mint that the Mint's quality control shouldn't have allow to be released."
Anyone else want to give their input on this question?
1996,1997,2000
Doubles, clips, blank planchets, partials etc.. were not an accepted outcome and therefore considered to be an error.
Anyone else want to add their input on this subject?
1996,1997,2000
If die cracked coins aren't errors what are they excatly then?
1996,1997,2000
Seriously what is a die cracked coin called if not called a error coin?
1996,1997,2000
(Me, I think they are errors, but common errors... others??? Hmmm...) So, I'll bump ya again and see if you get a bite!!
<< <i>How about die clashes? **My Personal Favorite** >>
I like this one
Hoard the keys.
Here is the coin in question my die cracked 1921 morgan
1996,1997,2000
Hoard the keys.
And I think die cracks, die breaks, cuds, retained cud are errors.
San Diego, CA
<< <i>Ok
If die cracked coins aren't errors what are they excatly then? >>
They are errors but common enough not to bring much of a premium unless hyped up like the "speared bison" .....
</FONT>V
An unintended mistake. No error coin is a type coin.
LINK
Just a liitle info
Employees at the US Mint actually call "die clashes",
die "kissing". When the 2 dies just barely touch each other leaving the oppisite dies impression, "Kissing"
In the Error Hobby we call the error "Clashing"
You can tell I have too much time on my hands today! Oh well
Thanx
Rich Schemmer
Rich Schemmer Error Coins
http://WWW.RichErrors.com/store.php
Trusted Name in Numismatics & the Error Coin Hobby for OVER 25 Years
it has die cracks on the obverse but the reverse has a crack.the crack is runs in length from tail feathers extending out through the leaves and claw on one side.
so it is noteworthy to me reguardless of value.
would it qualify under mint error defective planchet for the reverse?
There is a difference between the terms errors and varieties. Varieties such as doubled dies, although they may result from an error in the manufacturing process of hubs or dies are usually not classified as errors.
The general defenition and Mr. Weinberg may want to add or take away from this is that an error is the result of a mishap in the minting process and are in fact unique as a coin but not necessarily unique as an error type. Coins struck on incomplete planchets for example fall into the category labeled as "incomplete planchets" but each coin is technically unique although it may be similar to others.
Errors would include things like multiple struck coins, capped die errors, incomplete planchet errors, coins struck on wrong planchets, broadstrikes, off-center strikes and any combination of striking problems.
Varieties are usually considered as coins that can be traced to particular dies or combinations of dies. So for example, every 1972 Doubled Die Obverse Lincoln Cent FS#1c -033.3 (Fivaz and Stanton) or Breen#2265 was struck with the same obverse die. In this case, the same reverse die was used as well and a small raised line above the D in UNITED on the reverse is used as a diagnostic marker on this particular variety. Not taking the die states into consideration, Each one of these coins theoretically has identical characteristics as other coins struck from the same dies. Coins struck by Doubled, Tripled, Quadrupled etc. dies are varieties.
There are some fuzzy areas. Die breaks can be used to attribute varieties and we see that all the time with respect to early copper coins and VAMS. A coin struck by a broken die can also be considered an error. What we refer to as CUDS (die breaks at the rim) are usually considered errors although they can sometimes be a marker used to attribute a variety.
How's that Fred? Clear as Mud, Right?
Have Fun,
Bill
myurl http://www.foundinrolls.com
Okay, go on.....
<< <i>Ok
If die cracked coins aren't errors what are they excatly then? >>
They're merely coins struck from a stage in the working life of a die that has sustained cracks as a result of metal fatigue. The die cracks are a normal, expected consequence of the physics of metallurgy, the stress induced by the extreme pressures used to strike coins. They are not error coins.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
In my Blackbook of US coin prices for 2003 and 2004 editions # 41 & 42 , page 71 in both books have this listed as a die error
please explain why these books and many dealers that i've talked to consider my coin an error coin?
1996,1997,2000
There are older books out there, The one that comes to mind was an Error book by Frank Spadone. In that book, die breaks were considered errors. Some of the older concepts hang on and since some things like die breaks are classified in several ways, they end up being called errors. It is fair to say that some people will call a coin with a die break the result of an error in the manufacturing process.
It depends on who you talk to. A VAM specialist or a person used to attributing old coppers would often use die breaks and even CUDS as die markers to attribute a die marriage or a variety. Die breaks are very much used to attribute varieties where sheild nickels are concerned.
On modern coins, die breaks are fairly common and are considered the result of a worn die being used to strike a coin. Small raised lines are not uncommon and don't command a premium (Except, it seems on Ebay) . A modern coin with a thick raised line that was the result of being struck by a die that is severely broken might cross the line and be called an error.
It is an arbitrary use of the word in some cases.
Have Fun,
Bill
myurl http://www.foundinrolls.com
And thanks for taking the time to respond to my question
1996,1997,2000
Edit to add: some coins I have bought have been errors, but not error coins.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
and to see what their opinions are on this subject
Thanks once again for taking the time to respond to my question
1996,1997,2000
myurl http://www.foundinrolls.com
An error would be an unintended alteration of the coin's design, by some mint process during the die preparation or striking of the coin.
That's about the best distinction I can think of.
I knew it would happen.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com