Looks like XF45 but I bet the grading services would give it an AU grade. They are generous with southern gold.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
top one definately nicer, maybe AU53? Bottom one maybe XF45?? I don't really know gold.
AKA kokimoki the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed Join the NRA and protect YOUR right to keep and bear arms To protest against all hunting of game is a sign of softness of head, not soundness of heart. Theodore Roosevelt [L]http://www.ourfallensoldier.com/ThompsonMichaelE_MemorialPage.html[L]
A is a solid AU 50 with appeal. B is a liner coin that could swing between AU and choice XF. A is more attractive than B and a coin I would be proud to have.
There is always a lesson. Coin A (PCGS AU-50) is offered by Legend for sale, and coin B just recently sold in the Heritage pre-ANA auctions. When I saw coin A listed on the Legend site, I was immediately interested in it. As always, I go to the Heritage site and checked for comps, and when I saw coin B, as a PCGS XF-45 in an older holder, my first reaction was that coin B was purchased in that sale, upgraded, and is now coin A. For a coin this scarce (total PCGS pop of 40), this is what I would have expected.
Boy was I wrong! They are indeed different coins, and at least by the photos, coin A appears to be the nicer, higher grade coin. I plan on taking a much closer look at it next week. I guess not all old green holder coins are upgrades, are they?
wow- the top one does look cleaned or I would have graded it 55 otherwise. The bottom ones looked Unc. to me. Glad I am not buying from the pics but if the first one looks like the picture I would never be happy with it.
the most important thingis probably which coin is best represented by it's picture?? they both look a little too bright to me and they both look like they're suffering the effects of a past cleaning. a more modern and less scarce issue would never get into a holder looking like that.................if the pictures are accurate.
<< <i>the most important thingis probably which coin is best represented by it's picture?? they both look a little too bright to me and they both look like they're suffering the effects of a past cleaning. a more modern and less scarce issue would never get into a holder looking like that.................if the pictures are accurate. >>
That's a good point. I see what looks like even, natural coloring on coin A with some scritchiness (is that a real word?) and harilines, but I will have a look in-hand in a few days. The photo of coin B looks washed out.
Comments
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
top one definately nicer, maybe AU53? Bottom one maybe XF45?? I don't really know gold.
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Join the NRA and protect YOUR right to keep and bear arms
To protest against all hunting of game is a sign of softness of head, not soundness of heart. Theodore Roosevelt
[L]http://www.ourfallensoldier.com/ThompsonMichaelE_MemorialPage.html[L]
second: XF 40
I'd say the first is AU-53 and second is (aw shute) too close I'd go AU-53 also.
Boy was I wrong! They are indeed different coins, and at least by the photos, coin A appears to be the nicer, higher grade coin. I plan on taking a much closer look at it next week. I guess not all old green holder coins are upgrades, are they?
AU50 & XF45.
291fifth, you nailed it!
Ankur
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
Top one VF
Bottom on XF
<< <i>the most important thingis probably which coin is best represented by it's picture?? they both look a little too bright to me and they both look like they're suffering the effects of a past cleaning. a more modern and less scarce issue would never get into a holder looking like that.................if the pictures are accurate. >>
That's a good point. I see what looks like even, natural coloring on coin A with some scritchiness (is that a real word?) and harilines, but I will have a look in-hand in a few days. The photo of coin B looks washed out.