Home U.S. Coin Forum

Latest NCS "Conservation Coin of the Month"... not sure if it's better.


The before pictures definitely show a "dirty" coin, but there is some underlying color that is utterly destroyed by the NCS process. Yes the after pictures show a cleaner coin, but you can still tell that it has issues.

I would have left the coin as is... to me the "before" coin has more character to it. The "after" looks lifeless to me... *shrug*

NCS commentary:

Residues can be more than just ugly obscuration of a coin's surface beauty. Residues can also eventually lead to staining and worse, environmental damage. Over time, offending residues can eat into the surface of a coin, permanently altering it chemically. What numismatists refer to as staining appears as large areas of dull white or grey-black on the surface of a silver coin and may result from active residues. Further damage by offending residues will cause a coin to be called “environmentally damaged.”

This particular proof Walking Liberty Half Dollar was saved by the professional conservation techniques employed by NCS conservators. Removal of the thick residues left the coin free and safe from the potential staining that plagues similar coins. This coin graded PF 66 with NGC following the conservation.


Before:

imageimage



After:

imageimage

Comments

  • jhusmanjhusman Posts: 1,082
    That "before" is Uuuuuugly.

  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    They both ugly.

    But yes, the first one is much more ugly.
  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭

    nice coin, but it looks cloudy. And the stain lines are still on the coin, almost like a fingerprint. especially on the left sde of the coin in front of Ms. Liberty. They can't remove them?
    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i would say that the only "issues" the coin has are a result of the wait to remove the contaminants.
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,738 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not that I care much for the Before version, but I think I'd be a little miffed if I bought a PF66 that looked like the After photo.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    Not really a coin that I would want to own in either condition.

    I think that I actually like the before pic just a little better. But, not by much.

    -------------

    etexmike
  • This content has been removed.
  • CoinRaritiesOnlineCoinRaritiesOnline Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭✭
    We don't specialize in dipped Proof Walkers by any means, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that if a dealer had that coin (the "before" coin) in his case for 5 years (almost regardless of price), no collector would even ask to see it.

    No one wants to add a $500 coin (or whatever that is worth) to their collection that looks like that. Maybe in "theory", but not in reality.

    We specialize in original, untampered with coins, but what that really means is "original coins that look attractive to collectors". We have had completely original, untampered with coins in our inventory, but unless they are attractive to the eye, it doesn't matter. We'll end up putting them in an auction unreserved after a period of time with no collector interest.




    Edited for clarity.
  • jmj3esqjmj3esq Posts: 5,421
    IMO, PF66 seems a bit high.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,737 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It goes from very ugly to merely ugly.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Both before and after are ugly.
  • flaminioflaminio Posts: 5,664 ✭✭✭
    Agree with most of the others. It's lipstick on a pig.
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is NCS really proud of their destruction ? My money says that many forum members could do a better job of removing some of the unsightly tone that was on the coin. Heck just about anyone can do a dip and strip.

    The after picture is plain horrible.

    Ken
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    I don't like either, but if I had to choose I'd take the "before" coin.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It goes from very ugly to merely ugly. >>


    Agree
  • speetyspeety Posts: 5,424
    The 'stains' are still there, just not as ugly in color. Either way not a choice coin by any means
    Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!

  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    The before pic looks like a complete trainwreck- I can at least see something positive out of that strip job... but it looks like too little, too late...
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • Yea, the "after" is much better.
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    The before coin would have been neat to keep in my coin cabinet. If I curated this coin and it looked like the after picture I would be pretty ashamed of it.
  • from FUGLY to just plaing ugly

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file