My initial impression is that it looks NT, but I have never seen colors quite like that on a Franklin, especially since mint set toning on most Franklins is a golden brownish color. Maybe it's just the photos. It doesn't look like a very high grade coin, that's why it's not in a TPG holder. Lots of scrapes around the hair behind the ear and the cheek, or maybe it's just the photos.
<< <i>My initial impression is that it looks NT, but I have never seen colors quite like that on a Franklin, especially since mint set toning on most Franklins is a golden brownish color >>
Not necessarily.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>My initial impression is that it looks NT, but I have never seen colors quite like that on a Franklin, especially since mint set toning on most Franklins is a golden brownish color. Maybe it's just the photos. It doesn't look like a very high grade coin, that's why it's not in a TPG holder. Lots of scrapes around the hair behind the ear and the cheek, or maybe it's just the photos. >>
This is a pretty common color on 57 mint sets but most don't have it to this degree. I must have owned 150+ 1957 double mint sets and this is the best color I have seen- and the only 57 mint set I still own. You are right the marks would keep it from a super grade but it don't really matter because it ain't going nowhere . My favorites though are the most colorful year- 1958.
<< <i>I sold the set with this coin last year....... I miss it .
>>
Well it's natural, but I think you need to either add a little cyan or add a little blue. My guess is the lighting you used warms the photo up and really enhances colors but it's not bringing out the true colors. Russ posted a coin similar and that looks a lot more like the natural toning we normally see. This picture just seems to have a bit too much yellow in the fields to be TRUE COLORS. I would say the coin is naturally toned but not photographically correct.
<< <i>I sold the set with this coin last year....... I miss it .
>>
Well it's natural, but I think you need to either add a little cyan or add a little blue. My guess is the lighting you used warms the photo up and really enhances colors but it's not bringing out the true colors. Russ posted a coin similar and that looks a lot more like the natural toning we normally see. This picture just seems to have a bit too much yellow in the fields to be TRUE COLORS. I would say the coin is naturally toned but not photographically correct. >>
Sorry this coin looks like it does in the picture- or at least it does on my LCD screen. A forum member owns this set now. By the way If you some of you did not get it I was kidding about asking if this coin was AT.
Comments
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it. >>
In this case, the reason is because it's still in the original cardboard mint set that caused the toning.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it.
Cause there arent any BC franklins and therefore they aren't worth the price of submission?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it.
You would be floored Dizz if you knew how many of us have some high powered coins that we DO NOT get slabbed....
<< <i>
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it. >>
In this case, the reason is because it's still in the original cardboard mint set that caused the toning.
Russ, NCNE >>
So was that famous Peace dollar.
<< <i>
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it.
You would be floored Dizz if you knew how many of us have some high powered coins that we DO NOT get slabbed.... >>
...and there's probably a reason for it.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it.
You would be floored Dizz if you knew how many of us have some high powered coins that we DO NOT get slabbed.... >>
...and there's probably a reason for it.
You bet your bippy there is
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>When a coin like that is not in a TPG holder, there's usually a reason for it.
You would be floored Dizz if you knew how many of us have some high powered coins that we DO NOT get slabbed.... >>
...and there's probably a reason for it.
You bet your bippy there is
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>My initial impression is that it looks NT, but I have never seen colors quite like that on a Franklin, especially since mint set toning on most Franklins is a golden brownish color >>
Not necessarily.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>My initial impression is that it looks NT, but I have never seen colors quite like that on a Franklin, especially since mint set toning on most Franklins is a golden brownish color. Maybe it's just the photos. It doesn't look like a very high grade coin, that's why it's not in a TPG holder. Lots of scrapes around the hair behind the ear and the cheek, or maybe it's just the photos. >>
This is a pretty common color on 57 mint sets but most don't have it to this degree. I must have owned 150+ 1957 double mint sets and this is the best color I have seen- and the only 57 mint set I still own. You are right the marks would keep it from a super grade but it don't really matter because it ain't going nowhere
Russ, WHERE did you find that '51? Holy Smokes!
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>Russ, WHERE did you find that '51? Holy Smokes! >>
It's one that came in with a consignment about a year and a half ago. Only graded MS64, but man was it pretty!
Russ, NCNE
U.S. Type Set
I liked this '56 set with a purple Frankie and a multi colored one:
Since this is turning into a picture post I hope nobody minds if I continue with close up of the halves from that set.
<< <i>I sold the set with this coin last year....... I miss it
Well it's natural, but I think you need to either add a little cyan or add a little blue. My guess is the lighting you used warms the photo up and really enhances colors but it's not bringing out the true colors. Russ posted a coin similar and that looks a lot more like the natural toning we normally see. This picture just seems to have a bit too much yellow in the fields to be TRUE COLORS. I would say the coin is naturally toned but not photographically correct.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
thats natural
seen `um like that b4
<< <i>
<< <i>I sold the set with this coin last year....... I miss it
Well it's natural, but I think you need to either add a little cyan or add a little blue. My guess is the lighting you used warms the photo up and really enhances colors but it's not bringing out the true colors. Russ posted a coin similar and that looks a lot more like the natural toning we normally see. This picture just seems to have a bit too much yellow in the fields to be TRUE COLORS. I would say the coin is naturally toned but not photographically correct. >>
Sorry this coin looks like it does in the picture- or at least it does on my LCD screen. A forum member owns this set now.
By the way If you some of you did not get it I was kidding about asking if this coin was AT.
<< <i>And Phatrmer you too- lets see a better picture of that quarter!. >>
k, mister, it's your thread
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."