Just got my grades from PCGS

combatmailman · February 22, 2007 4:49AM

after only 13 days on Modern tier. This is my first regular submission. Please leave your comments about the scores. Thank you.

2006-S $1 San Francisco Old Mint US PR69DC
2006-P $1 Benjamin Franklin-Founding Father US PR69DC
2005-P S$1 Marine Corps US PR69DC
1991-95-W $1 World War II US PR69DC
2005-P S$1 Marshall US PR68DC
1987-S $1 Constitution US PR67DC
1986-S $1 Statue Of Liberty PR68DC
2004-P $1 Lewis & Clark US PR68DC
1984-S $1 Olympic US PR67DC
1994-P $1 Vietnam US PR68DC
1994-P $1 P. O. W. US PR67DC
1994-P $1 Woman Military US PR68DC
1994-S $1 Capitol US PR68DC
2007-P $1 Jamestown US PR69DC

Barndog · February 22, 2007 4:50AM

are the grades reflective of what you thought they would be when you sent the coins in?

Bochiman · February 22, 2007 4:51AM

Some look good...I kind of wonder about the PR67DC (did you screen these?)

I do admit, after all the 20th annv posts, I immediately looked for PR70 and was shocked not to see any

combatmailman · February 22, 2007 4:54AM

I purchased these off of ebay at various times and my main concern was that they would be BB for not genuine. But yes I expected the grades I received, just a little dissappointed at the 67's. But I am satisfied.

kranky · February 22, 2007 5:00AM

14 proof DCAM modern commems distributed thusly: (5) graded 69, (6) graded 68, (3) graded 67.

Is there any chance these coins were mishandled before they got to PCGS? Because those are pretty low. Please don't think I'm slamming you - I'm not. And there was about zero chance any of those coins would have been "not genuine".

NowhereMan · February 22, 2007 5:07AM

<< <i>14 proof DCAM modern commems distributed thusly: (5) graded 69, (6) graded 68, (3) graded 67.

Is there any chance these coins were mishandled before they got to PCGS? Because those are pretty low. Please don't think I'm slamming you - I'm not. And there was about zero chance any of those coins would have been "not genuine". >>

I agree a 67 seems EXCEEDINGLY unlikely for a coin never removed from the capsule and submitted in the capsule.

I also agree that fakes here are VERY unlikely, as a person with the ability would focus on more valuable coins. Why bother with these.

That being said, I wish that PCGS would include BB's in the POP report so that we can see what coins the fakes are coming in from...

Rex

combatmailman · February 22, 2007 5:08AM

If they were mishandled then it was prior to my having them. I did not even take them out of their mint holders.

FlyingEagle · February 22, 2007 5:10AM

<< <i>I purchased these off of ebay at various times and my main concern was that they would be BB for not genuine. But yes I expected the grades I received, just a little dissappointed at the 67's. But I am satisfied. >>

You questioned their authenticity? You should stop purchasing coins and sending them off to the grading services until you learn more. Purchase some books and go to shows and dealer shops to learn.

combatmailman · February 22, 2007 5:25AM

Yes I am a new collector only a few years of collecting with little experience, but I have read books in regards to frauds and counterfiets and I am sure if I saw one I would notice it. But with that said, mistakes are made. I should have worded that differently to say "I thought a couple would be BB. and with more time and experience and following the Boards I will learn more. Thanks

Just got my grades from PCGS

Comments

Leave a Comment