Options
Who else is suprised that Franklin Comms have been a loser?
Yes, I would admit that the designs could have been better, but wow, graded samples can be bought on ebay for for near issue.
0
Comments
<< <i>That's because I bought one. >>
Maybe because I bought 4
<< <i>That's because I bought one. >>
That makes two of us.
2000 Gallery PPI Registry Set
Heck, I bought a NGC MS70 2005 Marine Corps for $85.
Time will tell, as always!!
I'm very good at picking losers!
On a serious note though, I do like the design of the coins and regardless of their long term appreciation or depreciation, they have a spot in my collection.
The name is LEE!
no loser there
The "scientist" one looks like crap, imho.
Since I sold more than enough to pay for what I kept, I don't have a problem with them
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
All The Way - And Then Some
I collect Modern Commemoratives
and anything Franklin.
<< <i>graded samples can be bought on ebay for for near issue. >>
-That's my cue
What surprises me is how some other things did go up in value, such as first strike and 20th Anniversary bullion.
Modern Commems can be fun and interesting to collect, but they rarely do much investment-wise. It's because there are so many of them, they're so easy to acquire, their mintages are large for such thinly-traded issues, and they have such a high survivor rates (practically all of them are in drawers somewhere).
From time to time, the Mint won't make very many of a particular issue because of unusually low demand or late-year minting. These can appreciate nicely (like the 1996 Jackie Robinson MS $5 gold, mintage: 5,174, Trends: $4200, or the 2000 Library of Congress bimetallic MS $5 plat/gold, mintage: 6,683, Trends: $800). Mintage numbers count more than anything else. Lower mintages by and large occur among the MS rather than the proofs.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
I am not surprised. The long term winners tend to be low mintage (less than 20,000 by one researcher), coins issued during economic hard times (record low unemployment for 2006). It is more amazing to me that some coins/sets have been big winners given their large mintages, and the healthy economy during time of issue. I doubt this trend can continue.
-Donald Trump
<< <i>"Ben Franklin has always been a loser. He is stupid, fat, and it's really no surprise that his coin was a loser, too. I can't believe anyone would buy something so repulsive."
-Donald Trump >>
Ben Franklin is on several coins. Donald Trump will never be on one.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
weiners, usually inverse to the world of reality. You got to
listen to the wonderkinds on the Forum. More times then not,
they will be spot on. After you have absorbed all the collective
knowledge, then make your own mind up
Beware, however, depending on mintage and demand, you might not have
a whole lot of time to make up what is referred to as a mind. It is all somewhat
of a gamble. But, you pays your money and you takes your chances.
Camelot
The chronicle sets are a loser. They are selling on flee bay for bout $40.00. Issue price was $65.00.
<< <i>Not really a loser as of yet. When they trade for a low melt value or 20% back of issue price, they can earn that designation
The chronicle sets are a loser. They are selling on flee bay for bout $40.00. Issue price was $65.00.
chron will be a secret winner way in the future when people are looking for unpicked over examples that might hit the random "70" grade
I can see it now, after the States/President/First Lady series the Mint comes out with an 'Icons of Capitalism' series that will get your picture on a coin for a 'donation' of a 100 million or so. Not that I think Trump is a good representative but a lot of folks from NY think so...and he does too!
K
<< <i>Ben Franklin is on several coins. Donald Trump will never be on one.
I can see it now, after the States/President/First Lady series the Mint comes out with an 'Icons of Capitalism' series that will get your picture on a coin for a 'donation' of a 100 million or so. Not that I think Trump is a good representative but a lot of folks from NY think so...and he does too!
K >>
The coin would have to be the size of the big round stones used for coins on the island of Yap, in order to be able to fit in both Trump's hair and his ego.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
Here is one of them
Jim
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
Now everyone is saying they produced too many.
So which is it, too many in comparison to other commems (Not an options as the mintage was restricted) or just too many period?
Personally I think they were fantastic designs and chose them as my first commems.
I lost out on the Chronicles set- I don't know if they will be a source for un picked over MS coins, as My opened set and others I have heard from thought they looked 68 tops.
A witty saying proves nothing- Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor
does the truth become error because nobody will see it. -Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948)
<< <i>I have one of each. I like them. I like Franklin. My Grandkids can decide if the Franklin Comms are "losers". >>
that is the right attitude!
<< <i>I like Franklin. I also liked the Founding Father commems so I have some. I'm not surprised they didn't go up in value.
What surprises me is how some other things did go up in value, such as first strike and 20th Anniversary bullion. >>
My sentiments exactly. I purchased the Franklin commems because I like them, not because I hope to fleece someone selling them. I do not consider them to be a "loser".
to say that is an understatement - for all the hype and all the intrest and everyone and their grandma buying a boatload of them
they have proved to be very dissapointing indeed . I bought one , and I had not bought a gov. mint issue since I wasted my money on that pityfull Washington Half more then twenty years ago ......i sold it at a loss and I sold this p.o.s Franklin at a loss too
<< <i>LOOSERS ?? LOOSERS !!!????????
to say that is an understatement - for all the hype and all the intrest and everyone and their grandma buying a boatload of them
they have proved to be very dissapointing indeed . I bought one , and I had not bought a gov. mint issue since I wasted my money on that pityfull Washington Half more then twenty years ago ......i sold it at a loss and I sold this p.o.s Franklin at a loss too >>
I guess that thinking is what separates us collectors from you investors. My appreciation of the coin (or any other) is not bound by my ability to flip it for a quick profit.
When talking about "losers," I think many collectors lost out on the 20th Anniversary ASEs by not getting them directly from the Mint. At least with these, there was a low per-household limit so people had a reasonable shot at getting them.
One difference between the Franklins and the ASEs is that the Franklins had a per-household limit of 100 and the 20th Ann ASE set had a per-household limit of 10. Perhaps the high limit on the Franklins caused many of those coins to end up with speculators looking for a quick flip and not initially with collectors? Also perhaps collector demand is lower than the maximum mintage and it was only the speculators that pushed the final mintages so high.