New purchase (yep, 'nother morgan) opinions?

clarkbar04 · January 24, 2007 3:47PM

Bid on this bad boy because I think it is one of those that will look so much better in hand, also looks like it could have a shot at 66 - what do you think? Paid a little bit more than I might have liked ($159) for it but when I see it, I think it will make up for it. Looks alot better than the MS63* battle creek coins I see going for that much.

Myqqy · January 24, 2007 3:50PM

Looks very frosty and clean! If the reverse is all there, then I don't think you overpaid at all....

IrishMike · January 24, 2007 7:41PM

I don't think you over paid for it and will get at least your money back some day for it. Nice rainbow.

Now check to see if its a VAM.

clarkbar04 · January 24, 2007 11:52PM

Thanks for your .02 fellas.

I officially was the high bidder in this, will post pics when I get it.

etexmike · January 25, 2007 12:00AM

Very nice looking and clean Morgan.

Great rainbow and a fair price paid. I think you did well on the purchase.

-------------

etexmike

RedTiger · January 25, 2007 12:28AM

Nice coin. Market price. No complaints from me.

HighRelief · January 25, 2007 12:43AM

A very nice frosty gem rainbow toned Morgan. When you think about it, $159.00 is not to much money to pay for a 127 year old gem coin like this.

Nice pick

Coxe · January 25, 2007 1:29AM

To be honest, it looks a bit like a crescent toned one of the same date I sold a couple years ago in an NGC 67 holder -- an old holder, in fact, that I personally owned for 10 or 15 years. You have a very nice looking coin and a wonderful one for a type collector wanting to fill that Morgan spot. You got a nice coin for a decent price. Good buy!

New purchase (yep, 'nother morgan) opinions?

Comments

Leave a Comment