Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Pin marks on high grade copper to remove spots

shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
Artificial toning gets all the headlines, but a cruder form of coin alteration is worth looking out for.

Looks nice at a slightly enlarged image size, an 1872 PCGS MS65RB.
image

Up close the pin marks that flecked away spots appear.
image
image

Thanks to Lakesammmon for spotting this on a coin I owned, he is a savy collector.

Comments

  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's not from a rusted die? Could that be what PCGS thought it was?
  • Options
    RWRW Posts: 485 ✭


    << <i>It's not from a rusted die? Could that be what PCGS thought it was? >>



    I was wondering the same? How can you be sure it's pin marks and would that even get rid of the carbon?
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    I was wondering the same? How can you be sure it's pin marks and would that even get rid of the carbon?

    It didn't get rid of all of the carbon. Just most of it. Remnants of it still exists in the first enlarged image.

    Do you guys really think this PCGS 65RB 1872 IH was struck from a rusted reverse die? That would be news flash.
    IH dies never sat long enough to rust. They were the workhorses of the 19th Century dies, more likely to crack
    than to see a hint of rust.
  • Options
    RWRW Posts: 485 ✭


    << <i>I was wondering the same? How can you be sure it's pin marks and would that even get rid of the carbon?

    It didn't get rid of all of the carbon. Just most of it. Remnants of it still exists in the first enlarged image.

    Do you guys really think this PCGS 65RB 1872 IH was struck from a rusted reverse die? That would be news flash.
    IH dies never sat long enough to rust. They were the workhorses of the 19th Century dies, more likely to crack
    than to see a hint of rust. >>




    I had no clue as to the life of an IH die. image Thank you for the education.
  • Options
    ldhairldhair Posts: 7,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I never knew folks did this. Nice to know.
    The first pic looks like it points to your C drive.image
    Larry

  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I was wondering the same? How can you be sure it's pin marks and would that even get rid of the carbon?

    It didn't get rid of all of the carbon. Just most of it. Remnants of it still exists in the first enlarged image.

    Do you guys really think this PCGS 65RB 1872 IH was struck from a rusted reverse die? That would be news flash.
    IH dies never sat long enough to rust. They were the workhorses of the 19th Century dies, more likely to crack
    than to see a hint of rust. >>




    I had no clue as to the life of an IH die. image Thank you for the education. >>

    Ditto.
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 30,345 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I never knew folks did this. Nice to know.
    The first pic looks like it points to your C drive.image >>



    There are far better ways to remove it but on low value coins this can be very fast and effective.

    Perhaps this was "cleaned" many years ago. Surely no one would do it to a '72 anymore.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    There are far better ways to remove it but on low value coins this can be very fast and effective.

    Perhaps this was "cleaned" many years ago. Surely no one would do it to a '72 anymore.


    It's done all the time. The 1909-S PCGS 67RD that sold for $97,750 has a spot flecked off
    under the nose in the obverse field.
    image

    No obvious pin mark was left, it was a great job.
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    << Surely no one would do it to a '72 anymore.>>

    Surely you jest. image
  • Options
    krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    Very interesting! If it was a rusted die, the marks would be raised, while small scrapes with a pin would leave little pits in the surface, correct? With the coin in-hand, can you tell that the marks are incuse?

    If so, it's hard to imagine what explanation would suffice other than the coin being fooled with.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • Options
    LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,703 ✭✭✭✭✭
    sHYLOCK:

    i'LL SHARE A FEW WHEN i GET HOME FROM MY PICTURE ARCHIVES. dO YOU HAVE ANY MORE??

    ps - nO, i'M NOT sTEWART. image
    Gone but not forgotten: IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal, CoinsAreFun.
  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭
    also on the ms67 ihc
    do the diamonds in the ribbon look
    too well defined compared to the overall
    soft(er) strike?
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    I'LL SHARE A FEW WHEN I GET HOME FROM MY PICTURE ARCHIVES. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE??

    I don't have any more, but I look forward to seeing more from your archives. image
  • Options
    I've seen some cruder ways of hiding spots... I was shown a Proof IHC by Brian Wagner where someone before him had made a scratch/scuff on the holder to try to hide a spot...
    -George
    42/92
  • Options
    BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i><< Surely no one would do it to a '72 anymore.>>

    Shirley you jest. image >>



    I think that he is totally serious - and you shouldn't call him Shirley image

    Thanks for the education - I learned smoething new today image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file