Another "Before and After" thread .... have you ever dipped a coin?
Craton
Posts: 2,670
I have and have NO issues with doing so. I have no issues with others doing so IF they know what they are doing!
Sorry for the bad scan ...... BEFORE:

AFTER:

Another:


Sorry for the bad scan ...... BEFORE:

AFTER:

Another:


0
Comments
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Yes it is ........ it was crap inside that ANACS slab. I had to free it and carefully/safely bring out it's true beauty.
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
EDIT- I'm such a hypocrite.
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Yes it is ........ it was crap inside that ANACS slab. I had to free it and carefully/safely bring out it's true beauty. >>
It's beautiful, certainly.
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Yes it is ........ it was crap inside that ANACS slab. I had to free it and carefully/safely bring out it's true beauty. >>
Did you dip it yourself, Jason?
The Morgan was fugly and a no-brainer dip.
The Frankie I am on the fence on -- the toning did not look that bad, but it looks like it was hazed. If there was no haze, I would likely keep it as is.
The real dilema is 19th century proofs that are hazed but still look OK -- those are dipped to get upgrades, but the resulting coin looks like a modern, like all those proof gold coins on the Albanese web site.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Yes it is ........ it was crap inside that ANACS slab. I had to free it and carefully/safely bring out it's true beauty. >>
Did you dip it yourself, Jason? >>
Shaaah.......
<< <i>Craton, did you use Jeweluster on both of those?
The Morgan was fugly and a no-brainer dip.
The Frankie I am on the fence on -- the toning did not look that bad, but it looks like it was hazed. If there was no haze, I would likely keep it as is.
The real dilema is 19th century proofs that are hazed but still look OK -- those are dipped to get upgrades, but the resulting coin looks like a modern, like all those proof gold coins on the Albanese web site. >>
The Franklin was so hazed over that even ANACS didn't see the cameo contrast. I did so I cracked it and took care of it.
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Amanda said crap.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Amanda said crap.
Russ, NCNE >>
I should get bammed for that.
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
Those are beautiful coins now!
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>BTW, Craton, don't you realize that you ruined an "original" coin? You're not being a good caretaker for the next generation of collectors.
Russ, NCNE >>
Thus my feelings of hypocrisy for liking it so much.
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
Honestly, what is the best and safest product and proscribed method for dipping?
<< <i>Wow! I think I'll take up dipping some of my proof frankies!
Honestly, what is the best and safest product and proscribed method for dipping? >>
Practice ............
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
<< <i>BTW, Craton, don't you realize that you ruined an "original" coin? You're not being a good caretaker for the next generation of collectors.
Russ, NCNE >>
Heh
I think the reason so many look down on dipping is that it's probably used when not needed way way too often, and can destroy luster, leaving a coin more unattractive. As you know, every second (or fraction of) a coin is in dip is critical. Practice is important.
You did a great job with yours Craton! If anybody who says the before coins are better looking, they need to get their eyes checked.
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
I, too, am I bad caretaker. I feel so guilty.
Russ, NCNE
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Yes it is ........ it was crap inside that ANACS slab. I had to free it and carefully/safely bring out it's true beauty. >>
Please elaborate.
VERY NICE RESULT!
<< <i>Russ, the second one looks so much better. My standards are crashing down upon me. >>
There is a place in this hobby for careful conservation.
Would you rather have this coin?
Or, this one?
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Wow! I think I'll take up dipping some of my proof frankies!
Honestly, what is the best and safest product and proscribed method for dipping? >>
Practice ............ >>
OOOkkkayyy....
Practice using what?
Better products, worse products... looking for input.
I actually have some hazy proof franks.
I also have a PR65 Ultra CAM that has a bit of something on it (snot or something, I'm sure). Wondering if it will dip off and help me move the coin up a grade or two.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Holy crap that's a nice Frankie.
-Amanda >>
Amanda said crap.
Russ, NCNE >>
I should get bammed for that.
-Amanda >>
YNs must type crap as, cr@p.
You're excused now.
<< <i>Don't get sucked in, Amanda!
Be careful Amanda, or the Forum will start MOCking you. Same for you Craton and Russ.
<< <i>
<< <i>Russ, the second one looks so much better. My standards are crashing down upon me. >>
There is a place in this hobby for careful conservation.
Would you rather have this coin?
Or, this one?
Russ, NCNE >>
Don't you just love those Teletrade RIPs?
<< <i>Don't get sucked in, Amanda!
Sage advice.
Russ, I forgive you for dipping Modern Cr@p™
-Amanda
PS- I would rather have the second Frankie from the images, but I would have had to see it in hand before it was dipped to make an educated decision.
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>Don't you just love those Teletrade RIPs? >>
That one was a triple play.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Russ, the second one looks so much better. My standards are crashing down upon me. >>
There is a place in this hobby for careful conservation.
Would you rather have this coin?
Or, this one?
Russ, NCNE >>
The first one, if I'm buying. The second, if I'm selling. Russ, you're my hero
Give any of these coins a decade or two and they’ll look worse than the original examples. Keep dipping them and you'll end up with slugs.
Dave
<< <i>My opinion: Dipping is a short-term solution.
Give any of these coins a decade or two and they’ll look worse than the original examples. Keep dipping them and you'll end up with slugs.
Dave >>
<< <i>Give any of these coins a decade or two and they’ll look worse than the original examples. >>
Horse crap.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Russ, could you tell from the picture that the Kennedy was a BM die before you bought it? >>
I pegged it for a DCAM, but had no idea it was a BM. That was lucky icing on the cake.
Russ, NCNE
Horse crap.
Russ, NCNE
Reality....
Dave
<< <i>c`mon. give it up. what was used to dip? will acetone give these results? inquiring minds want to know... >>
Was the dip diluted??
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Wow! I think I'll take up dipping some of my proof frankies!
Honestly, what is the best and safest product and proscribed method for dipping? >>
Practice ............ >>
OOOkkkayyy....
Practice using what?
Better products, worse products... looking for input.
I actually have some hazy proof franks.
I also have a PR65 Ultra CAM that has a bit of something on it (snot or something, I'm sure). Wondering if it will dip off and help me move the coin up a grade or two. >>
First off you have to be able to look at a coin and know whether a fast quick dip will improve the coin or not. No sense in taking an ugly coin and have the results be an ugly coin.
Some people use a diluted jewel luster type dip (dilluted with water) or a straight dip .... either way, you have be be FAST and you have to rinse the coin or you'll ruin it .......
Dipping coins is NOT cleaning coins in my opinion........... Cleaning coins RUINS coins .... you can certainly though ruin a coin by dipping it.
Your coin with the spot of "snot" I'll assume is a dark deep spot ...... dip probably wouldn't remove it totally.
<< <i>First off you have to be able to look at a coin and know whether a fast quick dip will improve the coin or not. >>
This point cannot be emphasized enough. Many coins cannot be improved and, in fact, might be made worse. And, the only way to learn it is to handle a lot of coins.
That is why I will not publically divulge my methods.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Give any of these coins a decade or two and they’ll look worse than the original examples.
Horse crap.
Russ, NCNE
Reality....
Dave >>
Wrong, Dave. The Teletrade coins turned in the holder because they were submitted in a crappy "softflip" with PVC.
If you stabilize the surfaces properly, as Russ does, they will stay that way for the forseeable future.
<< <i>Russ how does NCS do on preserving proofs? >>
They do an outstanding job. I send them the ones that I don't think I can improve myself. They're able, for example, to significantly reduce glue spotting, (not milk spotting, which is impossible for anyone). That's something I've never figured out how to do.
Russ, NCNE