Take a shot at grading this Morgan...(Grade Revealed)



I think this could be a good example of what PCGS would call Semi-prooflike, showing frosty luster with obscured reflectivity in the fields.
Good grading job everybody and thank you for the nice remarks


0
Comments
66PL
Nice coin.
66 - beautiful cheek.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Chris
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
"The silver is mine and the gold is mine,' declares the LORD GOD Almighty."
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
Will’sProoflikes
I got it right.
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>That sure is one really beautiful coin you have there. I also think that should be in a PL holder. >>
In the original spirit of prooflike, I agree. However, it is not mirrored but it rather a brilliant cameo. Those are underrated IMO and are rather attractive as you can see in this one. That said, if it was a 96-O instead of an 80-S, it would be PL.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>
<< <i>That sure is one really beautiful coin you have there. I also think that should be in a PL holder. >>
In the original spirit of prooflike, I agree. However, it is not mirrored but it rather a brilliant cameo. Those are underrated IMO and are rather attractive as you can see in this one. That said, if it was a 96-O instead of an 80-S, it would be PL. >>
Thanks for that explanation. I also appreciate your insight.