What's wrong with it? Not every 19th century coin needs to be blast white. Strike looks fine for the date. Marks are minimal and commensurate with the assigned grade. Looks wholly original and problem-free.
My apologies please for questioning your expertise, but the strike on the reverse just don't look right to me. Anyway, what do I know? It could just be a bad picture. Thank you for your opinion.
Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
<< <i>My apologies please for questioning your expertise, but the strike on the reverse just don't look right to me. Anyway, what do I know? It could just be a bad picture. Thank you for your opinion. >>
That is marred plastic. Drives me nuts too. No apologies needed. We love peer review and few questions are bad questions.
Looks clean enough to merit 65. Agree with Coxe the problem with reverse is likely on the plastic. May be a scan, which doesn't show luster well. Strike actually looks decent for the date/mint. I'd never buy it though. Seller would do better with typically lousy eBay photos . . . .
I suspect that is a coin which has to be seen in-hand to be evaluated. For some reason coins with that kind of toning don't look very good in photos.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
Comments
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
<< <i>My apologies please for questioning your expertise, but the strike on the reverse just don't look right to me. Anyway, what do I know? It could just be a bad picture. Thank you for your opinion. >>
That is marred plastic. Drives me nuts too. No apologies needed. We love peer review and few questions are bad questions.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Because it has no luster. IMO this coin should grade no higher than 64 due to the lack of luster.
I like it and I bet the coin has lustre that just can not be seen in the photo.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Ebay Item number 1190024511792
If so, that's unbelievable! >>
It's original and undipped. Isn't that what everyone here cries that they want?
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.