(abstain ) 64 64 (call it a 65 if that nick in the hair isn't as obvious in the hand)
I tell ya what, Doug, that's a pretty tasty herd of Buffalo you have there.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
1918-S: AU55/MS63 - This is the tough one. I could see this one as high as 63 with such strong luster. But the weak strike hurts it and there appears to be some marks from circulation. May have gotten a "compromise" grade in the grading room.
1926-D: MS64 - I like this one; usually an easier date to grade (and I'm probably no where near correct as a result of what I just said ) . Nice toning and better than average strike.
1928-S: MS63 - Not the prettiest toning and the strike is less than average. The obverse is a very late die state. I've never liked the luster on the 28-S. Like the 27-S, this date is commonly seen with proof like surfaces which don't appeal to me.
Comments
58
64
63
64
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
MS62
MS63
65
64
64
64 (call it a 65 if that nick in the hair isn't as obvious in the hand)
I tell ya what, Doug, that's a pretty tasty herd of Buffalo you have there.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
63
63
64
64
65
I want to play TOOOOO.
ms62
ms60
ms64
MS62 with a good shot at 3
MS64
MS64
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
63
65
MS63
MS64
To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
VF35
XF40
1918-S: AU55/MS63 - This is the tough one. I could see this one as high as 63 with such strong luster. But the weak strike hurts it and there appears to be some marks from circulation. May have gotten a "compromise" grade in the grading room.
1926-D: MS64 - I like this one; usually an easier date to grade (and I'm probably no where near correct as a result of what I just said ) . Nice toning and better than average strike.
1928-S: MS63 - Not the prettiest toning and the strike is less than average. The obverse is a very late die state. I've never liked the luster on the 28-S. Like the 27-S, this date is commonly seen with proof like surfaces which don't appeal to me.
<< <i>XF40
VF35
XF40 >>
Dan, you always seem to come up a little "short."
64
64
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
58
58/63
All of these weak strikes are throwing me off my game.
MS-64
MS-64
All of them are branch mint, which are known for poor quality strikes on buffalos.
Tom
4
3
63
63
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
26-D: Lacks some eye appeal. MS63
28-S: Like it best but is in a weak die state. MS64.
jom
I also have five more to post, one of which is raw. It will be the most interesting of the 11 I will have posted this week.
64
65
62
55
62
63
63
Not bad, eh?
64
65
<< <i>62
63
63
Not bad, eh? >>
Cool!
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
4
3
and it was
2
3
3
wow, i was damn close aye.