Hard to tell--could you show the whole coin-both sides? and perhaps the area a little above the 8 also? It appears it may be. If you show the whole coin-a VAM expert may be able to tell right away...(not me though) Bob
<< <i>I was just grasping at straws. It is the second 8 from an 1878 cc. Is it possible? I don't know. Is it likely I'm guessing no. >>
There were no 1877 dies to overdate. I would say just a tiny bit of random damage. TD
Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
I think you would see more detail on the upper right outside. A hardness test punch was customarily the 8, but not always. (There are MPDs with a 7 in the denticles.) It is not outside the realm of possibilities.
I have an 1886 into Leroy right now that appears to be a repunched date over a mistake 1868. I suppose 1878 could be mistakenly 1887 or 1877 and corrected. These are always worth looking for.
Comments
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>I was just grasping at straws. It is the second 8 from an 1878 cc. Is it possible? I don't know. Is it likely I'm guessing no. >>
There were no 1877 dies to overdate. I would say just a tiny bit of random damage.
TD
I have an 1886 into Leroy right now that appears to be a repunched date over a mistake 1868. I suppose 1878 could be mistakenly 1887 or 1877 and corrected. These are always worth looking for.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member