Options
Mint sells 75,000 Proof Buffalos first 24 hours
CaptHenway
Posts: 33,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
Yes, another Buffalo thread!
Coin World's online edition, www.coinworldonline.com, is reporting that the Mint sold 75,000 of the Proof Buffalo golds in the first 24 hour period.
TD
Coin World's online edition, www.coinworldonline.com, is reporting that the Mint sold 75,000 of the Proof Buffalo golds in the first 24 hour period.
TD
Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
0
Comments
LOL
<< <i>Only 225,000 to go until we see them on ebay at inflated prices. >>
As opposed to buying from the Mint...at inflated prices.
I know where one went!
There are just not enough Buffallo threads these days.
I was curious about those posts where people ordered at two different times, then noted difference between the order numbers, and calculated out how many coins were sold in between. That assumes the order numbers go exactly sequentially 1, 2, 3. Or 10001, 10002, 10003, or what ever the number format was. Does anyone really know how the Mint generates their order numbers? Do they even know?
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
Bottom line for me.....I buy 10 buffalos and sell 9 to defray the cost of the one I keep to at least below spot, perhpas even free, with not really much to risk. So, I'll get my buffalo to keep and enjoy at a very modest price. Plus.....I get 8004 frequent flyer miles :-).
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
<< <i>Regarding looking at order numbers... wouldn't the order number increment no matter what product was ordered - proof sets, etc.? >>
Could very well be. Someone should try an experiment: Buy something like an SAE, then later the same day place an order for a Proof Set, and compare the order numbers.
BST successful dealings with:MsMorrisine, goldman86
Hurry ! Time's running out.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
WOOHOO !! VINDICATION !!
I posted this 24 hours after the Buffalo's went on sale, needless to say, some didn't agree:
" I put in a dummy order last night, the difference in the order number between about 1 PM and 9 PM was 40,000, times the average number of buffalo ordered.
Everyone ordered 1, not likely = 40,000 first day sales.
2 average, still low, = 80,000
3 average = 120,000 sold
5 average = 200,000 - sold
I'm updating my numbers.
50,000 orders are the difference between when I ordered and an order I just put in. " (at 11:30 AM Friday, 24hrs)
Looks like an average of 1.5 Buffalos per order, I though it would have been higher, non the less, the numbers jive. Thank you, Thank you very much.
By the way the difference in the order numbers is well over 100,000 as of Monday.
Here's an idea, Maybe, Just Maybe, people like the coin and want to own one. Gee, what a concept.
As for the quality, I HOPE it's good, I hate sending back coins because they are crap. So why's that a bad thing?
As for reselling them, don't under estimate the stupidity of the consumer. Some Proofs have sold on ebay already, and they are still available from the mint.
As for 300,000, the first year of the AGE sold over 400,000. And that was BEFORE the internet. Plus there are more consumers of coins, worldwide.
But back to my original statement, maybe it's just a nice coin and people want to own it.
<< <i> What would be the lowest grade (67 or 68 DCAM). >>
Probably lower. I actually have sent coins straight from proof sets that came back PR66 before. I did not crack them out first either. My own stupid fault for not paying attention before submitting though.
<< <i>...................maybe it's just a nice coin and people want to own it. >>
IMO, that is the only reason to own it. But you don't buy 10 coins because you simply want to own one. I'd like to own one too, but I'm betting I can get one 5 years from now for $800 or less. We'll see if my patience is rewarded. If they change the design every year, I may loose that bet. Otherwise, I'm highly confident I can score it at a better price than the initial opening price (and spend my money elsewhere for now).
<< <i> But back to my original statement, maybe it's just a nice coin and people want to own it. >>
That is what coin collecting is all about
Kewpie Doll award-10/29/2007
Successful BST transactions with Coinboy and Wondercoin.
BST successful dealings with:MsMorrisine, goldman86
<< <i>As for 300,000, the first year of the AGE sold over 400,000. And that was BEFORE the internet. Plus there are more consumers of coins, worldwide. >>
And after 20 years, the 1986 proof still doesn't sell for much more than bullion and well below what the mint wants for the Buffalo. Long term I would suspect the same will happen to the buffalo and it will sell for a modest premium over the spot price. Unless they start changing the design yearly. Then they may hold their value better, or it may have no effect.
<< <i>
<< <i>As for 300,000, the first year of the AGE sold over 400,000. And that was BEFORE the internet. Plus there are more consumers of coins, worldwide. >>
And after 20 years, the 1986 proof still doesn't sell for much more than bullion and well below what the mint wants for the Buffalo. Long term I would suspect the same will happen to the buffalo and it will sell for a modest premium over the spot price. Unless they start changing the design yearly. Then they may hold their value better, or it may have no effect. >>
What about the buffalo silver dollar? Is that selling at a small premium over melt?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
probably not a good comparison. i seem to recall buying the two-coin Buffalo set for $54.95 at the time of issue when silver spot was about $5. extrapolated for this Gold Buffalo, the selling price would be about $3000-----5X spot @ $600/oz.-----and noone would buy it. this is almost certainly tied more to the spot price at least for now. time will tell where it sells in the aftermarket. to carry the point further along, that $54.95 issued set seems to sell around $300 now, approximately 6X it's issue price. this buffalo as a single issue(either Pr or MS) will almost certainly never sell for $2400.
the silver Buffalo prices have remained steady since they reached their high point, fluctuating a bit to either side. tied to the spot price as a bullion issue as i suspect this new Buffalo will be, it'll probably be available only as long as the price of gold remains high. when that slips, as we all know that it will, the coins will probably not be readily available, instead seeking a safe pasture to graze in until the price rises to higher levels, again, as we all know it will.
from that perspective i view this issue as a ploy by the Mint and Congress to to dump some of the nations gold reserve at perhaps the most optimum time. i'm not one of the forum economists who knows how this stuff works, but it makes sense to me to dump the gold that was bought at a low price while the price is high, seeing as how the Mint could never have moved this same volume with the Eagle gold bullion.
The only problem with your theory regarding dumping gold due to high prices is this program has been in the works for about 2 years or more. It takes forever to get something approved by Congress from the intiation phase. This program is entirely independent of the price of gold with respect to its development.
ah, but is the timing of the gold increase and the release of this much ballyhooed Bullion Item coincidental, that's the real question. strangely there doesn't really seem to be any reasoning for the rise in Gold prices past other coincidental happenings, nothing else that couldn't have had a finger pointed at it some six months ago as a reason. it's kind of like the spike in gas prices this weekend-----it just so happens to take place every holiday weekend and there always seems to be some type of reason that the oil companies offer up to explain it, some coincidence. we all know it's prioce gouging, nothing ever seems to be done about it. i'm not given to conspiracy and i'm not a paranoic, just someone who grows more cynical over the course of time. it's funny how the generality with regards to politics is to be liberal when young and to grow more conservative, almost never the oposite, though i'm sure it happens. eventually everyone becomes a Republican.
mind you, now, i'm not saying that when the legislation for this Bullion Item was proposed some grand scheme was put in place to drive the price of gold up to where it is, but i do wonder about the timing of the gold price and the items release. i assume someone has profitted, it's just too much money for manipulation not to be involved. greedy, greedy, greedy. you know what, maybe there was a plan...............................
co·in·ci·dence ( P ) Pronunciation Key (k-ns-dns, -dns)
n.
1. The state or fact of occupying the same relative position or area in space.
2. A sequence of events that although accidental seems to have been planned or arranged.