<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part. I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time.
<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part. I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time. >>
What HDude, you don't stand by your post of Nov. 28 of last year?
<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part. I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time. >>
What HDude, you don't stand by your post of Nov. 28 of last year? >>
I've been as bullish as anyone on silver the last few years, but no way did I think we'd be near $13 by now. The price rise from late last year has absolutely made my jaw drop.
I guess Ted Butler knew what he was talking about.
Comments
<< <i>
<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part.
I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part. I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time. >>
What HDude, you don't stand by your post of Nov. 28 of last year?
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Way overbought. Waiting for the blow off top, then a descent back down to the $7.50-$7.70 area. That would be a screaming buy point IMO. >>
With physical demand outstripping production and a production cost of $8 to $8.50, I fail to see the logic in this statement. >>
Dude, that was posted a while back. It was just wishful thinking on my part. I think single digit silver won't be seen again (if ever) for a long long time. >>
What HDude, you don't stand by your post of Nov. 28 of last year?
I've been as bullish as anyone on silver the last few years, but no way did I think we'd be near $13 by now.
The price rise from late last year has absolutely made my jaw drop.
I guess Ted Butler knew what he was talking about.
to change the rules of the game, for the governments advantage.
All government statistics have been and are being ,manipulated to undertate
unemployment and understate inflation. The GNP is being overstated to make
the pig look more like a silk purse. Enjoy the rally boys, we will be waiting here
to greet you all , on the way down.
Camelot