Home U.S. Coin Forum

Double denomination on eBay...but it looks...wrong?

Link

Can someone please point out to me what makes this look different than other double denominations?
Is it fake?
Is it because it still has a rim?

Sorry, but I'm stumped about why it doesn't look right...image
And the seller is in Belgium image
-Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA

Comments

  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    It's interesting that the seller has 70+ auctions running now, and that is the only one in English. Even the auctions for the other US coins he's selling are in French. He also seems to list his auctions in batches (large number of auctions that end very near the same time) but this one was listed all by itself (based on the end time).

    Oh well, just idle observations.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,277 ✭✭✭
    Doesn't look wrong to me so far, but I haven't quite figured out the alignment from reverse to obverse yet.

    imageimage
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    From the listing:

    NO RESERVE PRICE BUT I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO END THIS AUCTION AT ANY TIME IF I FEEL IT IS NOT BRINGING THE WORTHY AMOUNT.

    Yeah, that gives me warm fuzzies. Deal me in.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is NOT a Mint Error Double Denomination.

    Looks like man-made cent dies (genuine cent pressed into metal to make a
    crude "die") pressed over a normal dime.

    It's a fake double denomination - no question about it.

    Fred
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • SmittysSmittys Posts: 9,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought the dime looked to have too much details
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,277 ✭✭✭
    After holding a dime and a cent in an orientation equivalent to the first pic, and then inverting them, the orientation appears to be 180 degrees off form the pic of the "error" coin. Does anyone agree?
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭


    << <i>After holding a dime and a cent in an orientation equivalent to the first pic, and then inverting them, the orientation appears to be 180 degrees off form the pic of the "error" coin. Does anyone agree? >>



    I agree. Based on the photo of the obverse of the dime, the date of the Lincoln should be under the AMERICA of the dime.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭


    << <i>This is NOT a Mint Error Double Denomination.

    Looks like man-made cent dies (genuine cent pressed into metal to make a
    crude "die") pressed over a normal dime.

    It's a fake double denomination - no question about it.

    Fred >>



    freds word is good enough for meimage
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • MoneyCollectorMoneyCollector Posts: 454 ✭✭✭
    Yea - I agree with Steve. Its still early and I'm on my first cup of coffee, but seems to me that if the obverse of the dime and the reverse of the cent are almost lined up the same (rotation-wise), the other side should be also and it appears they are 180 degres off.
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fred's right. It's a fake double denomination.
    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • I got this link befor reading thru the posts. This is what a real one should look like.

    Fred Weinberg's site
  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Everyone seems to agree that this is fake, but I don't think that anyone has tried to answer the original question: "what makes this look different than other double denominations".

    The key here is that for double denominations, the *last* strike is the one with the most detail, since it will smoosh all of the earlier strikes. So, for cent-on-dime double denominations, the cent design is supposed to be fairly strong, with the dime design heavily flattened. In this piece, the opposite is true -- the cent design is mostly missing, and the dime design is very strong, including the rims.

    In a theoretical situation where a cent was struck on a dime planchet, and then that cent-on-dime planchet was later struck with dime dies, something like that would look more like what is shown in this auction.

    jonathan

  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536


    << <i>In a theoretical situation where a cent was struck on a dime planchet, and then that cent-on-dime planchet was later struck with dime dies, something like that would look more like what is shown in this auction. >>


    In that case though, the initial strike by the cent dies would cause the dime planchet to spread slightly and it would then no longer fit into the coining chamber when it got o the dime press. So the dime die strike would have to be an out of collar striking and there would be no reeded edge. This coin has a reeded edge so the dime strike came first.
  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>In that case though, the initial strike by the cent dies would cause the dime planchet to spread slightly and it would then no longer fit into the coining chamber when it got o the dime press. So the dime die strike would have to be an out of collar striking and there would be no reeded edge. This coin has a reeded edge so the dime strike came first. >>



    Yes. I did say my case was theoretical.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,778 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fred beat me to it.
    N/G
    TD
    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • FrankcoinsFrankcoins Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭
    Medal alignment on the cent strike...haha
    Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com
  • Rob790Rob790 Posts: 547


    << <i>Doesn't look wrong to me so far, but I haven't quite figured out the alignment from reverse to obverse yet.

    image >>



    It's an obvious FAKE because the top of the memorial strike can be seen to be warped and not straight on the picture above. A real double denomination would have been struck by hardened steel dies and would be perfectly straight like on a genuine Lincoln memorial reverse. The warping occurs because the false die's metal are too similar in hardness to the dime and warps itself when being pressed into it.

    Fake dies made by pressing a real cent into a soft metal, that was in turn impressed into a real dime. It's just so obvious from the pic.

    Rob
  • lathmachlathmach Posts: 4,720


    << <i>This is NOT a Mint Error Double Denomination.

    Looks like man-made cent dies (genuine cent pressed into metal to make a
    crude "die") pressed over a normal dime.

    It's a fake double denomination - no question about it.

    Fred >>




    If Fred says it's bad, you'd be foolish to buy it.

    Ray

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file