Grades Posted! 9x PCGS PO01's - wow!

Colorfulcoins · February 21, 2006 3:10AM

1 09453304 1851 1/2C USA FR2BN ---------as expected
2 09453305 1943 1C USA Enviromental Damage--------can't make a low grade steelie! HELP.
3 09453306 1836 25C USA PO1 -------- It was a PO01 or a FR02 maybe
4 09453307 1876-S 25C USA PO1 --------as expected
5 09453308 1901 25C USA PO1 --------as expected
6 09453309 1983-P 25C USA PO1 ------- wow, expected a FR02 and poss evena PO01. I owe jeremy for this GEM!
7 09453310 1882 S$1 USA PO1 ------- as expected
8 09453311 1890-O S$1 USA PO1 --------as expected
9 09453312 1903 S$1 USA PO1 -------- as expected
10 09453313 1923 S$1 USA PO1 ----- as expected
11 09453314 1924 S$1 USA PO1 -------as expected
12 09453315 1928 S$1 USA Refund - No Service --------come on, was a OGH crackout, prob can't tell P vs S mm
13 09453316 1928 S$1 USA Refund - No Service --------solid PO01, probab can't tell S vs P mm
14 09453317 1928 S$1 USA Refund - No Service --------solid PO01, probab can't tell S vs P mm
15 09453318 NO NUMBER US USA Refund - No Servic --------? Will have to check my invoice for this, perhaps a 1972-P IKE

Bottom line I have 3 PO01 Morgans for sale and the rest for my Pocket Piece set. Good results, would have been great if the 1928 Peace $1's had graded (and should have in my opinion......refund, no service means the coin is gradeable but there's something about the coin they can't determine). Here's the 3 Morgans.....

Russ · February 21, 2006 3:18AM

<< refund, no service means the coin is gradeable but there's something about the coin they can't determine >>

You just answered a question I've been wondering about for the longest time.

Russ, NCNE

CodyB · February 21, 2006 3:23AM

Those three morgans actually look pretty cool, nice job

Burks · February 21, 2006 3:24AM

Awesome. Any idea how many of those are in that kind of grade?

Coindexter · February 21, 2006 3:28AM

Wow. An 1983 P quarter in PCGS PO1. How the heck did you do that?

DennisH · February 21, 2006 3:37AM

Awesome!!!

That has to be a record for the most Poor-01s in one submission.

CarsonCityGold · February 21, 2006 3:43AM

Way to go !

PM Sent

braddick · February 21, 2006 3:51AM

I'd love to see that 1983 PO01 Washington!
I had one I sent to ANACS with a small grouping of other coins. They simply returned it, no holder (net or otherwise) with no explanation either. Oh, and no refund.

I always meant to call and ask why but was lazy and never got around to doing so.

Baley · February 21, 2006 3:53AM

congratulations on getting your coins certified

perhaps someday you will be able to upgrade to some pieces showing actual details!

Colorfulcoins · February 21, 2006 4:19AM

Very cool........my Pocket Piece 1792-1964 Copper, Silver, Nickel Registry set has droppped to an average grade of .93.....I think this is a first for ANY Registry set - an average grade of less than 1.00. LINK

Pocket Piece Copper, Nickel and Silver Type Set (1792-1964) .93 93.94% .86

poptopsRus · February 21, 2006 4:26AM

Outstanding group used and abused coins

airplanenut · February 21, 2006 4:30AM

Ah, what a great 1983 quarter

I got it when I looked through a large lot of coins for someone... that was the one I picked out

D · February 21, 2006 4:32AM

I'm curious, what does "Home Made" mean on your descriptions?

-Daniel

Russ · February 21, 2006 4:35AM

<< I'm curious, what does "Home Made" mean on your descriptions? >>

It means he submitted them raw, rather than buying them already holdered.

Russ, NCNE

D · February 21, 2006 4:37AM

I wasn't sure if it was a reference to how it was worn, or how it was submitted, thanks~

-Daniel

1921obsession · February 21, 2006 5:19AM

Do you think they'd cross at SGS?

pocketpiececommems · February 21, 2006 5:26AM

Congrats. I wonder if they got PO-01 on the brain looking at all of the low grade stuff at once. I hope they think that way when I send end my pocketpiece commemoratives.

Jcarney · February 21, 2006 5:48AM

<< my Pocket Piece 1792-1964 Copper, Silver, Nickel Registry set >>

That's amazing. I think I'm more impressed with your set than the top sets.

itsnotjustme · February 21, 2006 5:53AM

Congrats! I know how hard those PO01s can be.

onlyroosies · February 21, 2006 5:54AM

I don't think there is any other registry set out there with more pop 1 coins in it then
your set.

09sVDB · February 21, 2006 5:54AM

Awesome. PM sent

mozin · February 21, 2006 8:49AM

I am happy for you.

rainbowroosie · February 21, 2006 9:07AM

Craig,
You are awesome!!! No one can pick out crappy coins as well as you do!!!!

Please post a picture of your PO 1 roosie -- I think I've seen it, but I'm a bit confused between that coin and the other roosies in your Registry Set --- they are all so similar...

Roosies rule!!!

Colorfulcoins · February 21, 2006 11:56AM

Bill, you're being to nice (to Nick), you know this coin looks like one of his Roosies, not mine.

rainbowroosie · February 21, 2006 12:31PM

Craig,
you're right, that has more eye appeal than most of Nick's set

ChuckC · February 21, 2006 9:55PM

<< 1983-P 25C USA PO1 ------- wow, expected a FR02 and poss evena PO01. I owe jeremy for this GEM! >>

i gotta see this!

ziggy29 · February 21, 2006 10:13PM

<< Do you think they'd cross at SGS? >>

Only if you crossed at any grade. Then they'd come back AG-3, probably.

13PacesEast · February 21, 2006 11:03PM

i don't get it.

Grades Posted! 9x PCGS PO01's - wow!

Comments

Leave a Comment