Home U.S. Coin Forum

how trustworthy is the coin dealers newsletter (CDN)

fcfc Posts: 12,804 ✭✭✭
I am such a skeptical person. It is in my genes.

CDN was started in 1963 by Orvil L. Payne. It was created by dealers
for dealers. The history of the company can be found here.

No where on the site, can I find a list of names of who owns/runs/
partners/whatever the business. A heritage article though, did have
some names. Ex-dealers it appears of course. Link here.

In the 1990s, a lampoon of the newsletter came out called the
"Coin Demon Newsletter". It made fun of absurd dealers and the
coin hobby in general. It was published by Bigbootie of Wastelands, California. Info was found here.
Does anyone have a copy of this to share with me?

During the 1970s, CDN was owned by a coin promoter. The sheet
during this time was used by insiders for coin speculation. This info
was also found on the link above. Accurate? Maybe someone here
can fill me in in more detail.

Did the advent of this sheet basically ruin regional pricing by dealers
before the internet? After all, a coin being sold on the west coast
may not be sellable at the same price on the east coast.

Antique stores generally do not use this newsletter. They often just
buy a coin for lets say $10 and then mark it up 100% to $20. A coin
dealer on the other hand rips someone for that same coin for $10
dollars and then marks it up to the greysheet price of lets say $100.
Amazing how they get the best of both worlds.

Well, I would like your thoughts please.

A link that summarizes my worries about this hobby is written
by Mr. Snow of course. http://www.indiancent.com/articles/thoughts.htm
I am beginning to understand why he is well respected.

Comments

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The great thing about coins, unlike gas, electricity, food, education, automobiles, and Steelers' tickets and memorabilia, is that one does not need coins. If there were any hidden games, scams, or frauds, like in every other case, they eventually would become public knowledge and would ruin the business for those who put them on. To a small extent, this is always happening; witness the recent successes of ACG and the Savannah Scammer.

    One way to test the validity of the CDN is to try to buy and sell the coins per these prices. If you cannot consistently buy or sell coins at a price that is pegged near CDN with a 15% or so spread, the CDN will not work for you. For the coins I collect, most people have little use for it.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,509 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You will get more realistic prices for coins from Heritage's and Teletrade's auction prices realized archives. These are real prices paid for real coins. And these sites are free.



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,371 ✭✭✭✭✭
    CDN is off in many areas, but quite accurate in more liquid and highly traded areas (ex. common Morgans in MS65). But forget areas like
    scarce date XF/UNC bust half dimes for example. Teletrade has so many shill bids and high reserves you can toss out all of their gold
    prices and much of the type coinage as well.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • raysrays Posts: 2,424 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The CDN is unrealistic for early US coins. Nice, slabbed early copper often trades for multiples (like 3-4X) bid in public auctions.
  • When I started attending shows in the 80s I noticed every time I asked "how much" the dealers always rached for the greysheet. So I soon learbned to buy my own so I would have an idea what to buy/sell for.

    These days I much rather look at the Heritage site or Ebay for past sales, it gives me a much better idea.
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As has been said it is a good guide for certain kinds of coins including many generic coins like common date Morgans and Washingtons. Key dates, pre 1878, and rare dates are a completely different story and this is where The Heritage archives can be very helpfull. The part of the country you are in can also be a factor. I find that here at the local monthly show the CDN is very often used, even for the seldom seen better date type coins.

    Chris
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Their Certified Coin Market Indicator™ is laughable - not only the percentages (PCI about the same as ANACS, ICG at the top) but still including NCI and INS after all these years.
  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,525 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just try to buy an 1824 bust quarter for less than two times sheet!
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I buy it for the tax write-off and it also makes a great window cleaner.
    .... dealers bid below the grey sheet price on most coins listed in the CDN anyway. It is a good guide to go by. It is more reflective of the month to month than the week to week market activity and much closer to accurate than a hard bound red book. The market still dictates pricing, but it really ought to be a monthy or bi-monthly publication. It is Overkill, at it's best and Redundant, at it's worst.

    I am a skeptic too, but look at the daily racing form for horses..... It is a mere guide to history and offers an opportunity for one to "speculate" with a more educated guess than just "tossing" money out there without researching one's picks

    Or the Wall Street Journal.... everyone needs a little insight to make their picks.
    This particular rag "CDN" is about as good as it gets for a weekly publication. (barring these "other" coins that Laura ascribes to).... I speak more from the lower tier, common folks mouth. For us, it is a relatively close guide to what coins are going for. We all know the market has been hot and that is what drives the price more than a publication will.
    It's reporting, plain and simple..... Maybe not great reporting, but reporting nonetheless.

    Ah, I guess it is about as trustworthy as that guy changing them numbers on the big sign that tells the price of gas at the local gas station every day.
  • DaveGDaveG Posts: 3,535
    The Gray Sheet is a guide, and, like any other guide, you have to know how to use it. Even the folks - in this very thread (!) - who say that it's useless will still tell you that a particular coin sells for "twice sheet" or that dealers pay "10% less than sheet" - if that doesn't tell you that it's the most widely used price guide, I don't know what will! image


    In any event, even if the Gray Sheet were perfect, it could only tell you what a coin sold for last week, not what it will sell for tomorrow. Folks seem to forget that this "handicap" is more meaningful in a rising coin market.

    Check out the Southern Gold Society

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For a lot of the lower tier coins it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong; they set
    the market. They do a pretty good job of scouring buy lists and other venues to find
    what is being paid. They do react quickly and sometimes changes come quickly.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file