Options
Last image, maybe some progress. Question for photo folks: why does this happen?
pharmer
Posts: 8,355 ✭
I like to take raw images prior to submitting, and I just center 1 reveal bulb's "corona" on the coin, holding camera and coin in hand. My question is, why does this direct light reflection wash out the luster like this? Seems counter-intuitive that the bright luster that this coin exhibits would be diminished, rather than enhanced?
I realized how much it suppresses luster when I took this image with the corona offset, next to, not on, the coin. Now some luster shows, but the light is now indirect instead of going directly from the bulb, to the coin, and then to the camera. Why does direct light on the coin suppress luster? Thanks.
I realized how much it suppresses luster when I took this image with the corona offset, next to, not on, the coin. Now some luster shows, but the light is now indirect instead of going directly from the bulb, to the coin, and then to the camera. Why does direct light on the coin suppress luster? Thanks.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
0
Comments
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
are you using a "SLR" camera?....one you can see the shot thru the lens or ...a camera with one of those 1" x 2" view screens
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
Just basic Nikon 4200. By corona, I mean the round white reflection spot off of the 2x2 mylar. I look into the 2" screen until the spot is covering the coin and shoot. Nice color, no luster is the result. Is the camera make an adjustment? I didn't think so. Off of plastic, of course, and without a filter I have to angle my lights at about 45 degrees when imaging a slab. But I want to image raw
Mark, I'm not quite getting that, but I wish I could. I do understand the physics of visible light transmission, so you can get technical. This coin has both untoned and toned areas, and the corona is offset to the south east, just a sliver was over the coin. Now some luster makes it to the camera. How come? The angle of incoming light is only slightly off of directly above, and with the offset much less light is hitting the coin, but luster has appeared. With less incoming light. That's what I'm not getting.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Medium angle - luster band gets wider
high angle - even wider band of luster.
Now extrapolate out to ultimate high angle lighting - reflecting the light directly off of the coin like a mirror - the width of the luster bands go infinite and they cover the entire coin. All you see is luster, no dark intervening areas to show the luster for what it is.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i> By corona, I mean the round white reflection spot off of the 2x2 mylar. I look into the 2" screen until the spot is covering the coin and shoot. Nice color, no luster is the result. Is the camera make an adjustment? I didn't think so. Off of plastic, of course, and without a filter I have to angle my lights at about 45 degrees when imaging a slab. But I want to image raw
Mark, I'm not quite getting that, but I wish I could. I do understand the physics of visible light transmission, so you can get technical. This coin has both untoned and toned areas, and the corona is offset to the south east, just a sliver was over the coin. Now some luster makes it to the camera. How come? The angle of incoming light is only slightly off of directly above, and with the offset much less light is hitting the coin, but luster has appeared. With less incoming light. That's what I'm not getting. >>
I think what you are seeing is the often-discussed tradeoff between showing luster and showing color. If you reflect the light directly off the coin and into your lens, as I believe you are Pharmer, you will show the color of the coin best. If you instead reflect the light off the coin and past the lens, as Mgoodm3's photos show, you will show the luster the best. It is a tradeoff.
I've found that toned MS coins show the best color when shot with the light at the point just before reflecting off the mirrors. This way some luster is preserved in the shot. For proof coins, direct shots off mirrors look the best as they reflect the colors the best. Add a slab to the equation and I've yet to figure out a way to show a toned proof coin in its true glory.
Also, I think you might have a white balance problem as well. Shoot a pure white piece of paper (or a grey card) and post the results.
Hope this helps...Mike
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>To me the answer is simple: Reveal bulbs are not very good for capturing luster. >>
I disagree. Technique is more important than bulb type...Mike
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."