Home U.S. Coin Forum

Here's a Great Example of How Lighting Makes all the Difference in a Photo

airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
I shot this coin in November, but was in a rush... I got the lighting so the coin could be seen and took a quick snap, then put the coin away.

image
image


I had more time yesterday night, so I pulled out the coin and reshot it--I didn't spend a lot of time, I just played a bit more with the lights, and also set the metering to spot, as opposed to matrix (I'm not sure what it was set to the first time, but the darkness leads me to believe matrix)...

image
image


Quite a vast difference, I do believe image

Jeremy

PS- A note about spot metering: it measures the light from the center of your focus (aka the coin). This is NOT A GOOD THING for scenic pictures... if you go on vacation, turn the feature off. I've forgotten to, and a building may be nicely colored, but a bright blue sky becomes washed out white image
JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research

Comments

  • A big improvement image


    imageimage
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭
    Yes a VAST improvement. Congrats and a BIG image

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • MarkMark Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The second picture is better, but the coin still looks like a Jefferson nickel. Can you try again?

    Mark

    PS: image
    Mark


  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin and great photos.
    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • JoesMaNameJoesMaName Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭
    I actually like the top pics better. The details on condition and strike are better represented in the top pics. Though I can see why you like the color and brightness of the bottom two. Either way nice job.
  • FrankcoinsFrankcoins Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭
    Some test photos I made...

    http://frankcoins.com/test111405.jpg


    I did this test with various lighting and camera settings...all from the same distance and with
    the same setup...

    I got a coin back from an ebay buyer...he saw some marks that were not on my photo of a nice
    clean MS66 Franklin (sold years ago by Rick Tomaska)

    ..along with this kind email....

    I have just opened my coin from you and I am OUTRAGED... I don't know how anyone could have graded THIS coin as MS66. Second of all, the coin I received is NOT the coin pictured on Ebay! BAIT AND SWITCH does not even dignify your local club, I'm sure...let alone the Texas coin dealers association and certainly not the ANA! I am SIMPLY LIVID!!!

    I could go into the detail of the differences between the coin I received and the photos but frankly, I'm too nerved up at the moment. I have a mind to send the web page and the coin to the ANA but then of course I might win the battle but lose the money I shelled out for the coin. Needless to say I am very unhappy with the coin and in addition the hefty S&H&I I paid! Maybe I was sent the wrong coin or maybe you did not want to part with it for $200


    Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com
  • image










    Herb
    Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.
    imageimageimage
  • call me the devil's advocate, but the first pic looks more crisp and better in my eyes.
  • jayboxxjayboxx Posts: 1,613 ✭✭
    I like the top pictures better for the detail, the bottom for the color.
  • RKKayRKKay Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭
    Same coin, same session, same lights, different angles:
    image
    image
    image
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    Rick--

    The differences in your pictures are dramatic. That's incredible that it is just because of the angle of the lights.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Another example that I posted last night.

    two lights: less contrast, more even lighting, less intense color.
    image

    one light: more contrast, less light coverage, more intense color.
    image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • RKKayRKKay Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Rick--

    The differences in your pictures are dramatic. That's incredible that it is just because of the angle of the lights. >>



    It's amazing. And, looking at the coin in person, every one of the pictures could be an accurate depiction. It all depends on the lighting.
  • Jeremy,
    I like the first shot better.
  • ajiaajia Posts: 5,403 ✭✭✭
    Can those of you that have posted pict decribe the pights used? Do you know the temp. of the light(s)?
    If a digital, what was the color balance?

    A lot of factors play in how we (& camera's) see color, but RKKay's images are pretty dramatic! image

    Oh, and I like the first set of images better.
    BUT, as I've been told before....Unless you have seen the coin, please respect the fact that my images are accurate ! image
    image
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I do think part of the difference between the photos is also the compression--that's a factor I neglected to record, and could have resulted in some softness on the second shot.

    That said, the lights are the same Sylvania Daylight HaloFloods... just moved around.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    While the lighting and color on the second Jefferson is better, the details in the first one are much crisper. i.e. there is a blurring effect on the second one. I would have to say the first one is better because of this.

    Thanks for posting these, it is nice to see experimentation.
  • HTubbsHTubbs Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭
    Jeremy,any chance of you posting a picture of your lighting setup?image
  • carlcarl Posts: 2,054
    I agree with several others about the first photos being a little better. However, as already noted the coin still looks like a Jefferson Nickel. Maybe stronger lighting will bring out some other coin.
    Carl
  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I actually like the top pics better. The details on condition and strike are better represented in the top pics. Though I can see why you like the color and brightness of the bottom two. Either way nice job. >>



    I concur. I like the top set better.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • PS- A note about spot metering: it measures the light from the center of your focus (aka the coin). This is NOT A GOOD THING for scenic pictures... if you go on vacation, turn the feature off. I've forgotten to, and a building may be nicely colored, but a bright blue sky becomes washed out white

    Been there, done that. The first day in Europe I realized after a few pictures that my camera was sent to spot meter and manual white balance (my coin pic setting). The first few pictures all had an ugly blue haze. Fortunately I caught it soon enough and changed the settings.
    Bill

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file