Home› U.S. Coin Forum

AT or NT? Your opinions on this Kennedy...

HTubbsHTubbs Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
image

Comments

  • HobbyistHobbyist Posts: 215
    Wait for it.... Wait for it...
    Time sure flies when you don't know what you're doing...
    My Web Sites
  • HTubbsHTubbs Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Wait for it.... Wait for it... >>



    There you go,sorry about that...picture issues...
  • DickyBetzDickyBetz Posts: 3,825
    Looks like an endroller to me. It might be BBed for enviornmental damage if not AT, IMO.


    Just wanted to specify that I voted NT.image
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Dont look natural and its fugly.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • TUMUSSTUMUSS Posts: 2,207 ✭
    NT
  • p8ntp8nt Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭
    NT but not the most attractive thing in the world...
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    I'd say NT and definitely unique.
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Not market acceptable, so the point's mute. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • TonedCoinTraderTonedCoinTrader Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭
    NT






    Toned Coins for sale @ tonedcointrader.com
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    That coin is slabbed, and I believe it is NT...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    PCGS
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Doesn't change my thoughts about it I'm afraid. Even if it were deemed natural toning, to me it borders on environmental damage and it isn't a piece I'd seek or buy. The holder doesn't make it appealing.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    image
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    highly suspect
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The holder doesn't make it appealing >>



    Yes it does.... to the "sheep."image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • HadleydogHadleydog Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭
    Here we have a piece where it doesn't really matter how it got that fugly!image
  • uofa1285uofa1285 Posts: 2,252 ✭✭
    Wouldn't slab due to damage/chemicals.
    Visit my eBay Store to see my (mostly) overpriced Rainbow Toned PCGS/NGC coins! IshopCoinShows4You
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Doesn't change my thoughts about it I'm afraid. Even if it were deemed natural toning, to me it borders on environmental damage and it isn't a piece I'd seek or buy. The holder doesn't make it appealing. >>



    Great year for a coin image, however, I agree with Don on this....I think it is ED and even if NT, I wouldn't get it....and, I love 1968 coins....

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Not market acceptable, so the point's mute. image >>



    Sorry to be a spelling Nazi, but I believe that you meant "moot"

    And I agree with you.

    Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1

  • p8ntp8nt Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭
    Its in a PCGS MS64 slab. If you want to see it, the Ebay auction is here.
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭
    NT and fugly.......sorry image

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    BBEgo.......thanks. My brain got lazy.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • HTubbsHTubbs Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Its in a PCGS MS64 slab. If you want to see it, the Ebay auction is here. >>



    Darn Ben,you beat me to it.image I saw this coin when I was scrolling through a list of auctions and a quick view of the thumbnail and I was certain it was one ugly AT'd piece.When I happened to see that it was PCGS certified I was quite shocked.Whether or not it is actually AT or just a ugly NT that should have been bodybagged for ED;this is definately not a coin I would expect to find in a PCGS cache.

    -Hayden
  • JRHJRH Posts: 542
    Pretty strange looking. I guess it could be appealing if you collect these coins and want one that's different (just to have a total range of what's possible). Not exactly what most would consider attractive toning.
    JRH

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...