A case where the pedigree is more important than the coin???

Shamika · November 23, 2005 9:07AM

1920-D Buffalo nickel

mgoodm3 · November 23, 2005 9:17AM

hacked the bust in half. Looks like a decent strike rev.

dizzyfoxx · November 23, 2005 9:36AM

For this coin, the pedigree definitely got my attention, the obverse "dripping wet" sparkling luster caught my eye, the reverse "sold" the coin!

Darkmane · November 23, 2005 10:52AM

dizzy i know you like showing off that coin, but the pedigree had NOTHING to do with buying it =P i just get jealous every time i see it

dizzyfoxx · November 23, 2005 11:02AM

<< <i>dizzy i know you like showing off that coin, but the pedigree had NOTHING to do with buying it =P i just get jealous every time i see it

>>

I know, I know, I'm probably posting it more than I should and the forum may be getting tired of looking at it... I won't post it again for at least a day or two.

DennisH · November 23, 2005 11:05AM

The only pedigree I can think of that has any influence whatsoever on value is King of Siam.

Shamika · November 23, 2005 11:17AM

<< <i>I know, I know, I'm probably posting it more than I should and the forum may be getting tired of looking at it. >>

Speak for yourself.

ddbird · November 23, 2005 11:18AM

I never get tired of that commem!

kryptonitecomics · November 23, 2005 11:18AM

Eliasberg certainly seems to drive prices much higher.....try to pick up a common date V nickel in MS-64 with Eliasberg on the holder. Be prepared to pay $150 more than another V nickel in the same grade

Regulated · November 23, 2005 12:08PM

I'm rather fond of the James Stack pedigree.

A case where the pedigree is more important than the coin???

Comments

Leave a Comment