The one on the left almost looks fake. The stars have a funny pointed look to them (as on a no drapery seated dime). See obv star #1 which almost looks like a 6 leaf clover rather than a start. The wear as already stated has an odd pattern to it.
Reverse star #5 almost touches the 2nd S in States, not so on the right coin. The first 8 in the date on coin one sticks upward, an odd feature considering how precise they were back then in making a nice even date. Star #4 is not well centered on the reverse on coin #1. This is a sloppy looking coin and might explain the odd wear pattern.
Well, the second one is a mostly acceptable Good-6 or so, although I could do without the rim nick on reverse. The first just sucks. The rim chews are unacceptable, and somebody tooled LIBERTY, maybe practicing on this disposable coin. Unless they are some special variety or something -- and I wouldn't know -- I can't see much reason to bother with either.
Yes, a contemorary counterfeit from false dies. The dies were made from scratch! The star positions and the depth of the LIBERTY give it away. The coin is struck on good silver and has a very good clear ring. The wear pattern on it look very normal, not like it was artificially worn down. At the time the price of silver was very low - about 50¢ to the dollar, but what I find odd is all the trouble the counterfeiter went to to make these dies. Does anyone have an example of the one on the left (the counterfeit) in higher garde? Anyone seen one?
You know, without a comparison piece I think it would slide thorugh a grading service, except... how many people would submit a G Barber half? And if they noticed that LIBERTY, they probably would catch it. I found it in a batch of low end halfs of similar grade.
Comments
They still suck.
Reverse star #5 almost touches the 2nd S in States, not so on the right coin. The first 8 in the date on coin one sticks upward, an odd feature considering how precise they were back then in making a nice even date. Star #4 is not well centered on the reverse on coin #1. This is a sloppy looking coin and might explain the odd wear pattern.
Either a pattern (lol) or a fake imo.
roadrunner
Drunner
<< <i>Stars on the reverse, reverse lettering, arrows . . . all do not look correct. I opt for the first half being a contemporary counterfeit.
Drunner >>
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
You don't see too many counterfeits in Barber halves, but the coin on the left is one.
Based on this thread's title, I was hoping to see an 1898 micro O.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
<< <i>The first one has been re-engraved. >>
Either that or it's bent.
siliconvalleycoins.com
First, there is to much detail on the obverse stars, stars should look more like the second coin, considering the wear on the coin.
Second, "LIBERTY" on the headband is way to strong, belongs on a VF-35 or XF-40 half, not one that grades Good-6.
Third, the letters of the legend, on the reverse, don't look quite right.
Fourth, on the reverse, the bottom of the left branch is way to close to the letter "F" in HALF.
Fifth, the stars on the obverse should not have curved sides leading to the star's points, but should be perfectly straight.
Connor Numismatics Website
I like the second one.....
I heard that ACG graded one MS 62.......................
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
<< <i>I heard that ACG graded one MS 62.......................
SEGS went MS70!
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
<< <i>Post your comments on these 1898 Half Dollars: COUNTERFEIT & REAL >>
I would love to own it.