Options
Guess the Grade on this 1886 Morgan Dollar--Grade Revealed!
airplanenut
Posts: 22,776 ✭✭✭✭✭
I must say, even though it's white, I like this one... great lustre and strike. There are a few light marks on the cheek (including two small "craters," which look to be planchet flaws). Since the marks on the cheek were a little bit muted in the picture, I've given a blow-up of the cheek, and am also providing unresized images for you micrograders 
Link to massive obverse picture
Link to massive reverse picture
So what does me lady grade?
Link to massive obverse picture
Link to massive reverse picture
So what does me lady grade?
JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
0
Comments
Thats one heck of 64 if its graded at that though...
Ill go 65 for the clean fields too
">"http://www.cashcrate.com/5663377"
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
nice coin even with craters
Collecting since the 1980's
Morgan Dollars Circ. Strikes
- Basic Set - Varieties - Prooflike Basic Set - Date Set
- Carson City - Early S Mint Short Set - Mintmark Type Set
Morgan Dollars Proof
- Basic Set - Varieties
Peace Circ.
Free Trial
<< <i>Just remember that the large picture of the cheek is a huge blow-up of the coin... the marks are there, but they're light. Crater probably wasn't the right word... >>
In that case, 66, maybe? But I still say they use it as an excuse to give it a 63 if it had an 'O' mint mark.
Morgans.I was always 1 or 2 points below the grade,
with marks as that one.So I say..66 hand down,lock.Has
to be
Al
<< <i>But I still say they use it as an excuse to give it a 63 if it had an 'O' mint mark. >>
I've never seen an O-mint morgan with a strike like this down at 63 unless it was gashed
******
<< <i>
<< <i>But I still say they use it as an excuse to give it a 63 if it had an 'O' mint mark. >>
I've never seen an O-mint morgan with a strike like this down at 63 unless it was gashed
True. That would be a ridiculous O-mint strike. I guess they'd look for the faintest, most infinitesimal cabinet friction and call it 58, then.
Chris
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
<< <i>PCGS MS64, NGC MS65 >>
I agree
<< <i>64, and it needs some toning........
I agree but it's a 65..."-)
Currently Listed: Nothing
Take Care, Dave
Jeremy
Kyle
When grading Morgans the the cheek is almost the be-all end-all of the grade, all other things being acceptable. This one is a magnificent looker that unfortunately almost appears as though someone exposed the cheek to the bar and pointed ends of a paper staple at some point. The 3 marks are in the only place the grade would be dramatically lowered to 64, although on luster it has a shot at 65 at NGC even with the noticable distraction. This shows you can collect gorgeous coins that are twice the eye appeal of 4 and 5 figure priced drab and boring superb gems.
<< <i>Accugrade in Des Moines? ...When did that happen? >>
A long, long, long time ago... before they were the ACG we know and... can't say love here...
Morgannut2... I'll respectfully disagree with you. I've seen a lot of 65s, and a lot of 66s. I've seen both grades with worse cheeks than this, especially on 65s. There is no doubt in my mind that this coin is a solid, high-end 65. When I get the chance, I'll show it in-hand to some people.
Jeremy