Toggle navigation
Quick Links:
Collectors Corner
|
PCGS
|
PSA
|
PSE
|
Collectors.com
|
CU
|
Coinflation
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
U.S. Coin Forum
2005 nickel shots added below in "our nickel"! will the 2006 Monticello require another sh
1907Quarter
Posts:
2,770
October 26, 2005 12:45PM
in
U.S. Coin Forum
or will it be too much like the old Monticello?
USPI minimalist design collage
designset
Treasury Seals Type Set
0
Comments
ms70
Posts:
13,956
✭✭✭✭✭
October 26, 2005 12:50PM
<< <i>will the 2006 Monticello require another shot? >>
Only if Mr. Paseo does it!
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
0
ss350camaro
Posts:
4,529
October 26, 2005 12:53PM
<< <i>2005 nickel shots added below in "our nickel"! will the 2006 Monticello require another shot? >>
I'm sorry but this just doesn't make any sense to me ..........
What are you trying to say here ?
0
Theop
Posts:
515
October 26, 2005 1:48PM
He's asking if the 2006 reverse will be the same as the pre-2005 reverse. At least that is what I think he is asking...
Dave - Durham, NC
0
flaminio
Posts:
5,664
✭✭✭
October 26, 2005 1:48PM
<< <i>or will it be too much like the old Monticello? >>
It's the same as the old Monticello. You don't need to post another shot of the reverse (but obviously, you do of the obverse).
0
LastExitInNY
Posts:
600
✭
October 26, 2005 3:24PM
I know its early but how many rolls of the new 2006 nickel are you guys thinking of buying? If you are that is.
0
Leave a Comment
Bold
Italic
Strikethrough
Ordered list
Unordered list
Format
Spoiler
Code
Quote
Heading 2
Heading 1
Emoji
Url
Image
Align left
Align center
Align right
Toggle HTML view
Toggle full page
Toggle lights
Drop image/file
Home
•
U.S. Coin Forum
Comment As ...
Comments
<< <i>will the 2006 Monticello require another shot? >>
Only if Mr. Paseo does it!
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>2005 nickel shots added below in "our nickel"! will the 2006 Monticello require another shot? >>
I'm sorry but this just doesn't make any sense to me ..........
What are you trying to say here ?
<< <i>or will it be too much like the old Monticello? >>
It's the same as the old Monticello. You don't need to post another shot of the reverse (but obviously, you do of the obverse).