Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Question about a certain grade.

Hello, I have recently started up collecting U.S. coins and other forms of currency. I have only been active in the hobby for a few months now, so many things are still unclear to me.

Anyway, while I generally understand how some coins are graded, there is still one thing I have not quite figured out yet. What, exactly, does it take for a coin to be graded as a "cameo"? What makes these coins appear to be darker than other grades? Also, why is it that not all Proof coins are cameos? Are these coins simply scarce, in high demand, or flat-out overvalued?

Hopefully my question didn't seem painfully obvious to you, and that I posted this question in its proper forum.

Thank you.

image

Comments

  • Options
    Welcome form a newbie too!! You'll find alot of information here...Just wait, they will be comming!!! image GOOD LUCK!!
    Still Learning.
  • Options
    relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    The flat surface area of the coin is refered to as "fields" and the raised area, the date, portrait, letters are called "devices"

    The minting process of proof coins, which are double struck using highly polished dies, leaves a white "frost" on the devices.

    When the fields have a mirror like surface and there is contrast between the fields and the frost on the devices, the coin is given a Cameo designation. When the contrast is more intense, with highly frosted devices and deep mirror fields it is given a Deep Cameo or Ultra Cameo (NGC) designation.

    Prior to 1973, the Mint didn't really care what they were doing and didn't keep the dies polished, so only the new dies produced Deep Cameo proofs.

    Today all modern proofs are deep cameos, but there are cameos prior to 1973 (even though I can't find any) image
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,343 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Where's Russ? He could do a killer explanation with some kennedy pics to demonstrate.
  • Options
    p8ntp8nt Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭
    Fresh Meat!


    Russ, NCNE



    Hehe. Just kidding. Welcome. Russ should be along shortly.
  • Options
    F117ASRF117ASR Posts: 1,416 ✭✭✭
    Welcome.

    You have asked for a mouthful but that's ok. When I was new I was confused as heck as to what a cameo was.

    Anyway, when it comes to determining what proof is a cameo, that will only become clear with experience. Read these boards and past threads and look for threads particularly from Madmarty, Russ and Dheath. I would sa y the easiest thing to do would be to buy a 1964 proof set (very cheap probably about $8) and a 1980's proof set (also cheap $6). You will be able to see the difference almost automatically. One is frosty and one is shiny.

    As to your question whether they are all valuable, some are and some arent. It depends on the coin and the year. Experience will teach you that. Though generally any pre 1968 cameos/deep cameos are worth more. Some are just amazingly tough to find (such as a 1965 SMS Deep Cameo Lincoln cent) and others are more common (1964 kennedy halves). Prices vary greatly and both NGC, PCGS, and ANACS have different standards so it's best to take a look at a variety of examples.
    Beware of the flying monkeys!
    Aerospace Structures Engineer
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Welcome, fellow newbie! image

    Russ will have better pics, but here are two quick ones to show the difference:

    Regular proof:
    imageimage

    Deep Cameo proof:
    imageimage

    A cameo proof would be between the two.

    Hope this helps...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,509 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Suggest that you get "Coin Collecting for Dummys". Its a great book and covers all aspects of coin collecting. Its an easy read and I'm sure you'll learn a lot from reading it.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    image
    - There are 10 kinds of people in this world...those who understand binary and those who don't!
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 29,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Welcome aboard.

    MikeInFl says it pretty eloquently. Various techniques have been employed over the years
    to impart the "roughness" to the dies which cause cameo and this has worn off the dies at
    variable rates. When it's worn smooth the die strikes regular brilliant proofs rather than cam-
    eos. Some dies are sandblasted to achieve this effect and some have been resandblasted
    after it wore off. Not all proof and SMS dies get this preparation to start with so for some dates
    it is quite scarce. Prices can be high because not only do collectors value this look but it is as-
    sociated with new dies and collectors also treasure the sharp and complete detail which often
    accompanies new dies.

    Modern dies are etched with acid and then chrome plated to retain their capacity to strike such
    cameos.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    Wow. Thanks, everyone! You've really helped me with all of my questions.
    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file