Options
How would you grade this Morgan? (Grade revealed in first post.)
Steve27
Posts: 13,284 ✭✭✭
I always thought that a 66 should be a super coin and a DMPL should have nice clear fields, IMHO this is a 65PL.
"It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
0
Comments
<< <i>i would give it a MS65PL. realllllll nice. >>
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
PCGS does give out 66's, correct??
I recall when I first got here I graded a coin 59...............heared a lotta snickering going on after I made that
statement.
Herb
Prolly DMPL
Shot at 67DMPL.
Nice coin for sure.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
However, what's going on to the left of the eagle's wing? I hope that's not a fingerprint?
No.
******
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I think you have a good question. According to the experts, PL/DMPL is dependent upon the quality of the reflectivity of the surfaces and not the CAM/DCAM appearance. Additionally, I agree that the fields look hazy.
TorinoCobra71
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
CG
I'd tilt and rotate the coin in the light, and I'd look closely at the coin.
I might use a 7x loupe to examine the highpoints of the design,
and I'd try to evaluate it's overall appearance and grade it
versus the various grades of Morgan dollar that I've seen before
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
I might use a 7x loupe to examine the highpoints of the design,
and I'd try to evaluate it's overall appearance and grade it
versus the various grades of Morgan dollar that I've seen before"
How sad is that.
Free Trial
<< <i>There were 25 bids on it, currently at $3201; evidently, somebody out there likes it. >>
I like it, too -- just not as a 66DMPL. I like it as a 65PL and arguably as a 66PL. I don't see DMPL on this one.
IMO, this is an example of buying the holder instead of the coin, which could result in overpaying by a factor of 5.
<< <i> I always thought that a 66 should be a super coin and a DMPL should have nice clear fields, IMHO this is a 65PL. >>
Those surfaces look like a mid 66 to me. However, I wonder if the coin hazed, turing a DMPL into a PL!
<< <i>IMO, this is an example of buying the holder instead of the coin, which could result in overpaying by a factor of 5 >>
How can you tell mirror depth from a photo? Its hard enough to tell whether a particular coin with good reflectivity is PL or DMPL when you've got the coin in hand. You just can't do it from that photo.
CG
<< <i>How can you tell mirror depth from a photo? Its hard enough to tell whether a particular coin with good reflectivity is PL or DMPL when you've got the coin in hand. You just can't do it from that photo.
CG >>
True, especially given that the image looks like a scan. The scan can make the coin look hazy when it really is not. For that kind of dough, I would need a return privilege to confirm that the coin is indeed DMPL.