Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

"All coins are low-end widgets until proven otherwise..."

RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
or "How much do care about sellers' descriptions?"

This an offshoot from another thread.. Let me start by saying that I assume that all coins in dealer inventories are low-end widgets. It is up to the seller to tell me why this coin is better than others of the same year/denomination/grade.

Examples:

a. 1857-D $5 PCGS XF-40

b. 1857-D PCGS XF-40. A delightfully original example that is unusually well-struck with a paucity of marks and superior eye appeal for the grade. Far better than the XF-45 which sold at the Heritage Long Beach sale.

Which coin are you going to make an inquiry?

Comments

  • The first one imageimage
    -George
    42/92
  • OffMetalOffMetal Posts: 1,684
    The first one image

    Ben
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Probably the first one. The problem with the second is that EVERY coin in the dealer's inventory tends to have a description like that. When every coin in every dealer's inventory is "exceptional" it tends to make you skeptical.
    I heard they were making a French version of Medal of Honor. I wonder how many hotkeys it'll have for "surrender."
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    Which coin are you going to make an inquiry?

    What's the pricing? image

    What I would like to point out is that it is to easy to fall into the trap that others' concerns are the same as yours. We all buy and sell coins for our reasons and our reasons alone. Sometimes those reasons overlap but at other times they are very different.

    If you make the assumption that all buyers and sellers "should" behave a certain way and or have the same concerns as you, you will probably wind up being frustrated and/or disappointed.

    Joe. IMO
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The pricing is the same...or irrelevant.

    The first seller is offering up a faceless coin. Either the coin is not so hot or the seller does not have the time, knowledge, or interest in making the coin attractive to a discerning buyer. Okay for the slab hunter and widget collector, though.

    The second seller knows the market for the coin, how it compares to others, and lets you know why he/she thinks it's better than those that are ostensibly similar.

    The problem with the second is that EVERY coin in the dealer's inventory tends to have a description like that. When every coin in every dealer's inventory is "exceptional" it tends to make you skeptical.

    The discerning buyer knows how to read betwen the lines. Remember, I asked you which coin you were going to inquire on, not necessarily order. The inventory listing should be a starting point for your investigation, not the ending point.
  • ttownttown Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭
    I'd have to agree on the price of each coin. If the second coin had such eye appeal then I'd expect it to have an XF45 grade. Grant it if it's close and you think you could get a bump...maybe if you play that game. For me an XF40 properly graded is an XF40 and I wouldn't pay extra for a little more eye appeal. Some of these dealers seem to add quite a bit extra for a description like that IMO.

    Edited to add:

    If the price is the same I think it's a no brainier as long as it's in a good TPG holder. Of course promoting a coin and dealer attitude would play a role also. There dealer I'd go to get a feel for the price of a coin if offered but would never buy a coin from in a million years
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    The discerning buyer knows how to read betwen the lines

    This is a very interesting statement especially when you take into consideration some recent threads.

    What I would say is that as a buyer or a seller, you have to think about what the other party said not only by your standards which may blind you from seeing what is really being said by the other party. If you think of everything in terms of the way you think it "should" be done, you may find yourself in very many disagreements.

    Joe.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,804 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For what they cost, I would check out both coins. Hype doesn't necessarily make the second coin be the better coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about:


    a. 1881-S Morgan PCGS-65

    b. 1881-S Morgan PCGS-65. Delightful, rainbow toning and very nice for the grade.

    Same price

    ?
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hype doesn't necessarily make the second coin be the better coin.

    Who says it is hype? It is at the very least opinion, and quite possibly fact.

    This is a very interesting statement especially when you take into consideration some recent threads.

    I am talking about buying coins from reputable dealers with return priviliges. I am not talking about buying coins from questionable or unknown sellers on ebay.
  • OffMetalOffMetal Posts: 1,684
    I'd go with the second one for the morgan... just because it has a rainbow on it image As long as it's not AT.
    Ben
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Coins aren't widgets. Don't let someone with a poor command of the English language drag you down to his (or her) level.
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    How about:
    a. 1881-S Morgan PCGS-65
    b. 1881-S Morgan PCGS-65. Delightful, rainbow toning and very nice for the grade.
    Same price
    ?


    Given this additional info as well as: I am talking about buying coins from reputable dealers with return priviliges, I would purchase coin b. without hesitation.

    Joe.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    It all depends on how much I trust the seller's sescription. Do they typically fluff-up the description or do they tell you what they really think? If I trusted the dealer, #2 would porbably be the one I would want to see. If it's truly better it will probably be priced a bit higher also. I would still want to see pics because I'm kinda picky that way.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    As the saying goes, I think a picture is worth a thousand words. If I were looking for an 1857-D $5 and came across an online inventory that listed out two examples, assuming both had pictures, I'd click on both and make my own conclusions regardless of whether or not a written description was given.
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    Coins aren't widgets

    But to some they are image , again, you buy for your reasons and I will buy for mine.

    In RYK's example, if I was looking for a 1881-S Morgan PCGS-65 (yes, believe it or not, some people buy the slab and not the coin) and I came across the first coin advertised for a price I was willing to pay, I would buy coin a.. If however I came across both ads, then I would buy coin b. because of the extra description.

    Joe.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As the saying goes, I think a picture is worth a thousand words. If I were looking for an 1857-D $5 and came across an online inventory that listed out two examples, assuming both had pictures, I'd click on both and make my own conclusions regardless of whether or not a written description was given.

    True. Picture quality varies widely. Pictures can be made to emphasize and de-emphasize certain coin qualities. I think that they are great for demonstrating the difference between a blast white Morgan and a rainbow-toned Morgan. They are less great at demonstrating the difference between original and unoriginal MS coins and especially circulated gold.
  • KentuckyJKentuckyJ Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭

    Is either of the coins listed with a quality pic? image

    KJ

  • mirabelamirabela Posts: 5,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would like to see both coins. A Dahlonega half eagle is not a "widget," no matter what <<that dealer>> says. Maybe the first one is dipped out, or overgraded, or just boring somehow. Then again, it is entirely possible the first one is a nice, original coin too -- maybe the seller just isn't the type to describe it, for whatever reason. Maybe he sells most of his coins in person. Whatever... if it keeps you off of it until I get a chance to at least check it out, great!

    Such a thing, anywhere in the spectrum of XF40, comparable at whatever level to the one that sold in whosamabob's recent sale, is a sufficiently uncommon thing on the market as to warrant inspection on its own merits if that is the sort of coin you've got in your sights.

    To summarize, the description might draw my attention, but I would not necessarily breeze on by, simply on account of the lack of one.

    mirabela
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭
    Coins are not fungible; thus, they cannot be called widgets (every coin is different).
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,804 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Coins are not fungible; thus, they cannot be called widgets (every coin is different). >>

    image

    I'm glad someone said it. No two coins are alike even if they have the same date, MM, grade, slab, etc.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,672 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coin dealer descriptions are little more than puffery. If it is in their inventory it was probably already rejected by the client they thought they could "flip" it to.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭
    I'm enjoying this thread because I don't think a single poster has said that they believe a description given by a "reputable" dealer.

    If that's the case, then no one should have any problem or gripes with any description given by anyone anywhere. The standard has been set. image

    Joe IMO image
  • ttownttown Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭
    To me the term "reputable" dealer" is in the eye of the person buying the coin. When I was spending a grand a month back in the early 80's my "reputable" dealer" was much more reputable than a guy walking in off the street to buy or sell. As you establish a relationship with one the deals tend to be better and you get the better hand picked stuff.

    Who knows one just might let you "Cherry Pick" all the proof and mint sets behind the counter......
  • kiyotekiyote Posts: 5,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm actually a fan of widgets-- I'll include most modern coins (Proof sets, mint sets, PCGS Roosies) in that catagory. "Wannabe" dealers like me can buy and sell them all day without much hassle. A 2003 silver proof set is a 2003 silver proof set pretty much no matter who you buy them from. They're all with blasting deep cameos with a shot a PR70. The only return I've ever gotten was on a non-widget coin.
    "I'll split the atom! I am the fifth dimension! I am the eighth wonder of the world!" -Gef the talking mongoose.
  • I'm late getting on today, but here's may take...

    Without a doubt I would investiagate the second coin. Here's why...

    The dealer tell me it is 1)original, 2) well-struck, 3) a small amount of marks, 4)has superior eye appeal, and 5)gives me a pricing comparison with the Heritage sale number.

    This is exactly what I would want to know and this dealer has gone to the effort to give me a picture of the coin before I even see it. I would certainly not buy without seeing the coin or have a proper return policy, but this dealer brought this coin to my attention. It's my job to make sure it measures up.

    There is absolutely no information imparted by the first description.
    ...AlaBill
  • ddink said: Probably the first one. The problem with the second is that EVERY coin in the dealer's inventory tends to have a description like that. When every coin in every dealer's inventory is "exceptional" it tends to make you skeptical.

    I totally agree with this statement. I once bought an MS65 common date morgan from a prominent national dealer who has a very large assortment of Morgans. It was hyped to the max. It was okay looking, but had very heavy die polish on the reverse, which wasn't noted, and which I didn't find attractive. After that I really noticed that all of his coins were basically described the same: "PQ+++," High end for the grade," "A real gem," blah, blah, blah. I kept the Morgan, but I've never bought another coin from him.

    Cartwheel
  • anablepanablep Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Perhaps, then, the title of this thread should read: "All coins are widgets until proven otherwise..." Leave out the "low-end" piece since a coin can be considered of good quality for different reasons to different persons. Including "low-end" implies inferiority or substandard. I don't think you're describing the quality of the coin per se here, but rather the quality of the dealer and/or the extent to which "research" has been done in describing the quality of the coin or its attributes and/or flaws. This thread really speaks to the extent of honesty in the sale of coins. That's my take.
    Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!

    "Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."


    ~Wayne
  • ecosecos Posts: 391
    Okay for the slab hunter and widget collector, though.

    One mans Widget is another mans treasure.
    image
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Considering all dealers, I would concur that the majority of slabbed coins held, are in fact lower end. The nicer ones are in strong hands.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold


  • << <i> Considering all dealers, I would concur that the majority of slabbed coins held, are in fact lower end. The nicer ones are in strong hands. >>



    If this is true, it means those of us purchasing now are mostly buying the "dregs" of the coins, the top end, PQ coins being unavailable.

    If this is true, it is a depressing thought.
    ...AlaBill
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    This has been a strange, meandering thread!

    I would concur that the majority of slabbed coins held, are in fact lower end. The nicer ones are in strong hands

    This kind of statement snubs many collectors of modest means.... there are lots of nice coins out there, not just ones that cost 6 or 7 figures and that are in strong hands....
    I agree with RYK, that modern dealers need to learn how to describe and sell their coins more effectively. Seasoned collectors usually have strong criteria for things they want to buy- and every coin deserves its own unique description...... image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,815 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Actually, I was hoping that I could quit my day time job and write catalog descriptions for... whoever will pay me. Except that will probably not last long when I describe one of their highly prized coins as a marginal dipped out POS not worthy of consideration at this lofty price.image

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • ttownttown Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Considering all dealers, I would concur that the majority of slabbed coins held, are in fact lower end. The nicer ones are in strong hands.

    roadrunner >>



    I say that's right to an extent but from what I've seen these coins wouldn't be priced the same. The dealer of the PQ coin is going to charge more knowing what he has.
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    I will not even inquire about a coin unless it has a picture. I know there is a great dealer of gold coins but he does not post pictures. I tend just to look and see what he has, but I don't take the next step and call to get descriptions, etc.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)


  • << <i>I'm actually a fan of widgets-- I'll include most modern coins (Proof sets, mint sets, PCGS Roosies) in that catagory. "Wannabe" dealers like me can buy and sell them all day without much hassle. A 2003 silver proof set is a 2003 silver proof set pretty much no matter who you buy them from. They're all with blasting deep cameos with a shot a PR70. The only return I've ever gotten was on a non-widget coin. >>



    Very good synpsis! Those 1999 Silver Proof Sets are the greatest widget of all. I wish I had bought more than one set. image
    I have been a collector for over mumbly-five years. I learn something new every day.
  • marmacmarmac Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭
    I will look at anything with a "paucity of marks"image
  • morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293
    I prefer a dearth of marks-image
    morgannut2

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file