Got me some grades from across the street!

All in all, not bad!
001 001 1972 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
002 002 1968 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
003 003 1968 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
004 004 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
005 005 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
006 006 1969 S 50C PF67 ULTRA CAMEO
007 007 1969 S 50C PF69 * CAMEO
008 008 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
009 009 1969 S 50C PF69 * CAMEO
010 010 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
011 011 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
012 012 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
013 013 1969 S 50C PF67 CAMEO
014 014 1969 S 25C PF68 CAMEO
015 015 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF67 RD
016 016 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF68 RD
017 017 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF67 RD
018 018 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF65 CAMEO
019 019 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
020 020 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
021 021 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
022 022 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
023 023 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
024 024 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
025 025 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
026 026 1970 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
027 027 1970 S 50C PF69 CAMEO
028 028 1970 S 50C PF68 * CAMEO
029 029 1970 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
030 030 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
031 031 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
032 032 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
001 001 1972 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
002 002 1968 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
003 003 1968 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
004 004 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
005 005 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
006 006 1969 S 50C PF67 ULTRA CAMEO
007 007 1969 S 50C PF69 * CAMEO
008 008 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
009 009 1969 S 50C PF69 * CAMEO
010 010 1969 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
011 011 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
012 012 1969 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
013 013 1969 S 50C PF67 CAMEO
014 014 1969 S 25C PF68 CAMEO
015 015 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF67 RD
016 016 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF68 RD
017 017 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF67 RD
018 018 1970 S SMALL DATE FS-030.2 1C PF65 CAMEO
019 019 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
020 020 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
021 021 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
022 022 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
023 023 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
024 024 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
025 025 1970 S 50C PF69 ULTRA CAMEO
026 026 1970 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
027 027 1970 S 50C PF69 CAMEO
028 028 1970 S 50C PF68 * CAMEO
029 029 1970 S 50C PF68 CAMEO
030 030 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
031 031 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
032 032 1970 S 50C PF68 ULTRA CAMEO
It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!
0
Comments
Super grades....
Nice results, even if they are are the young side.
Joe
<< <i>Glad to see Hall has bent under the pressure and they're back to over grading. Didn't think it would take long to get the new grader for ANACS under controll on these moderns! >>
The grades are from NGC.
Now on to stage 2 - The Crossover
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
With the grades that you received on these coins and assuming that you are planning on selling the 32 coins, do you believe that the money you receive from your sale of these coins will give you a profit after you reimburse yourself for:
1. the cost of acquiring the coins (I assume you obtained them from proof sets that you purchased);
2. the cost of having them slabbed (postage, insurance and grading fees);
3. the cost of having them marketed and sold (i.e. postage, advertising, E-bay fees, etc.)?
If you expect to receive a profit, how much do you think you will make (your expected profit expressed as a dollar figure or range; and expressed as a percentage return on your total acquistion, holding and resale costs)?
Modern crap
<< <i>32 halves submitted, 8 PF69UCAMS, 25% of the submission is thus 69UCAM. Kudos to you Marty.
With the grades that you received on these coins and assuming that you are planning on selling the 32 coins, do you believe that the money you receive from your sale of these coins will give you a profit after you reimburse yourself for:
1. the cost of acquiring the coins (I assume you obtained them from proof sets that you purchased);
2. the cost of having them slabbed (postage, insurance and grading fees);
3. the cost of having them marketed and sold (i.e. postage, advertising, E-bay fees, etc.)?
If you expect to receive a profit, how much do you think you will make (your expected profit expressed as a dollar figure or range; and expressed as a percentage return on your total acquistion, holding and resale costs)? >>
Actually there were 28 Halves, 4 were Lincolns and don't count. So it's really 28.5% were 69UCAMs, and yes that order is a money maker.
<< <i>Glad to see Hall has bent under the pressure and they're back to over grading. >>
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Glad to see Hall has bent under the pressure and they're back to over grading. >>
Russ, NCNE >>
That is because Russ had a little chat with him!
3 "DAMMIT BOYS"
4 "YOU SUCKS"
Numerous POTD (But NONE officially recognized)
Seated Halves are my specialty !
Seated Half set by date/mm COMPLETE !
Seated Half set by WB# - 289 down / 31 to go !!!!!
(1) "Smoebody smack him" from CornCobWipe !
IN MEMORY OF THE CUOF
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>Glad to see Hall has bent under the pressure and they're back to over grading. Didn't think it would take long to get the new grader for ANACS under controll on these moderns! >>
You have a "hidden" agenda here? You feel like lashing out?
1) These are NGC, not PCGS
2) "Hall" is most likely David Hall...that is PCGS...see #1
3) Can you please be coherent in your post?
4) How do you know they are overgraded? Marty goes after volumes of moderns, esp halves, and knows what to look for.
5) See #3.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
Well done Mart...more Phil-Am coins pls...
42/92
<< <i>
<< <i>Glad to see Hall has bent under the pressure and they're back to over grading. Didn't think it would take long to get the new grader for ANACS under controll on these moderns! >>
You have a "hidden" agenda here? You feel like lashing out?
1) These are NGC, not PCGS
2) "Hall" is most likely David Hall...that is PCGS...see #1
3) Can you please be coherent in your post?
4) How do you know they are overgraded? Marty goes after volumes of moderns, esp halves, and knows what to look for.
5) See #3. >>
LOL!!! Agreed, incoherent drivel. But once I saw the word "Hall" I pretty much concluded the poster did not know what the he11 he was talking about.
<< <i>I pretty much concluded the poster did not know what the he11 he was talking about. >>