Home U.S. Coin Forum

Looks like another E-Bay seller complaining that PCGS is tight!

MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

Comments

  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What an idiot. He even quotes the Pops for a PR69 instead of a PR68. If you don't like the grade on the holder, crack the coin and sell it raw or shut up.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Why the private feedback if they're all positives?
  • Am I correct in noting that the slab number would indicate that it is indeed NOT a recent submission?
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Why the private feedback if they're all positives? >>

    Makes no sense. For many bidders, private feedback = no bid. And if they are so sure this is a slam dunk DCAM and perhaps a 69, they can always resubmit it.
  • JrGMan2004JrGMan2004 Posts: 7,557


    << <i>

    << <i>Why the private feedback if they're all positives? >>

    Makes no sense. For many bidders, private feedback = no bid. And if they are so sure this is a slam dunk DCAM and perhaps a 69, they can always resubmit it. >>

    Or send it to NGC since it's a "DCAM PF68+ at any other service!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" image
    -George
    42/92
  • JrGMan2004JrGMan2004 Posts: 7,557


    << <i>Am I correct in noting that the slab number would indicate that it is indeed NOT a recent submission? >>

    New holo... recent submission...
    -George
    42/92
  • Why the private feedback if they're all positives?

    Some people like their privacy. Go figure...
    image
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Some people like their privacy. Go figure... >>

    They must like lower bids for their stuff, too...or else they value their privacy so much that they'd rather get fewer bids for their stuff than divulge their feedback. Which, in this case, doesn't seem like anything to hide unless it was someone who slammed them in the comments while accidentally giving a positive... image
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    S/H $10 is a little "steep" huh?image
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • They must like lower bids for their stuff, too...

    So you wouldn't buy a slabbed coin from a Power Seller that has A LOT of Positive Feedback? OK, that's your option and the seller may not give a damn. Why do you think Ebay allows you to have "Private" feedback? Maybe s/he doesn't want you to see his or her purchases or what's been sold in the past...
    image
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 25,106 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Why the private feedback if they're all positives? Some people like their privacy. Go figure... >>

    What privacy? What privacy?

    Finding out what an eBay user recently bought and sold is easy, private feedback won't hide that anymore. Outside of his business on eBay, what is a user trying to hide?
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    .

    [deleted -- duplicate entry, see below]
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>So you wouldn't buy a slabbed coin from a Power Seller that has A LOT of Positive Feedback? >>

    If it were a potential rip and they had a legitimate return policy, maybe. Or *maybe* if they had a coin I had to have.

    But they are still less likely to get a bid, and if they get one from me, it's likely to be lower. And "Power Seller" status means nothing to me. Many ripoff artists hide behind the "Power Seller" label, and because they generate so much revenue for eBay they get away with it. (There are plenty of legitimate and reputable Power Sellers, of course, but I don't look at it as a seal of approval, only a seal of doing a lot of business.) >>



    (Edited to add: I've seen some of this seller's recent offerings. Only a 4-day return privilege on a raw Trade Dollar? Hardly sufficient, as it takes much longer than this to get it authenticated.)
  • GoYankeesGoYankees Posts: 1,025
    "IN GOD WE TRUST" on that coin looks as if it's lacking frost. Could that be the reason it's CAM and not DCAM? In other words, do letters count as well as the main devices for cameo/DCAM designations?
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that this headline is a recurring Ebay strategy that I'm seeing certain coin sellers use to jack the selling price of their "mis-slabbed" coins. They claim the grade is incorrect hoping suckers (like me I guess!) will pay a premium thinking it can be resubmitted for a higher grade.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>but it seems that this headline is a recurring Ebay strategy that I'm seeing certain coin sellers use to jack the selling price of their "mis-slabbed" coins. They claim the grade is incorrect hoping suckers (like me I guess!) will pay a premium thinking it can be resubmitted for a higher grade. >>



    Or maybe PCGS really is grading very tight right now.

    Russ, NCNE


  • << <i>

    << <i>but it seems that this headline is a recurring Ebay strategy that I'm seeing certain coin sellers use to jack the selling price of their "mis-slabbed" coins. They claim the grade is incorrect hoping suckers (like me I guess!) will pay a premium thinking it can be resubmitted for a higher grade. >>



    Or maybe PCGS really is grading very tight right now.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Russ, by "very tight" do you mean that a lot of these coins are coming back misgraded? Or were they "loose" to begin with and now are accurately graded? I don't know enough about the history of grading to understand what's going on.

    Thanks.

    Rob
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ, by "very tight" do you mean that a lot of these coins are coming back misgraded? >>



    Yes.

    Russ, NCNE
  • streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This guy states....NOT PCGS........image

    in the title. Anybody who has been around ebay knows that is a no-no.
    You are supposed to say what it is, not what it is not.

    edited: Russ is correct, as usual. image
    Have a nice day
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>This guy states....NOT PCGS........

    in the title. Anybody who has been around ebay knows that is a no-no.
    You are supposed to say what it is, not what it is not. >>



    Actually, he's stating it's not a PR68CAM.

    Russ, NCNE
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    More unnecessary whining..... and it seems appropriate somehow that an ID of "wildbnch69" would have private feedback! image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file