Options
Just For Fun: Identify This COIN and Give it the ANACS Grade! :::ANSWER REVEALED:::
braddick
Posts: 23,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
A board member recently sold me this ANACS 'coin'. Can you identify it and place an ANACS grade to it?
I'll show the whole slab in awhile...
It'll be fun to see who is the closest: What it is. The DATE, and the Grade!
Overse:
Reverse:
See Post Below for the Answer (Slab)!
I'll show the whole slab in awhile...
It'll be fun to see who is the closest: What it is. The DATE, and the Grade!
Overse:
Reverse:
See Post Below for the Answer (Slab)!
peacockcoins
0
Comments
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Edited to add -- Upon closer review of the numeral "5," it looks to be 1858. I originally said 1856. And it *might* net to FR-2, but maybe not.
'56 flyer - FR02
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
G details, corroded, pitted, net FR02
Seth
Dang. just saw the original thread author was Braddick........ Make that VG details net P01 Corroded
3 "DAMMIT BOYS"
4 "YOU SUCKS"
Numerous POTD (But NONE officially recognized)
Seated Halves are my specialty !
Seated Half set by date/mm COMPLETE !
Seated Half set by WB# - 289 down / 31 to go !!!!!
(1) "Smoebody smack him" from CornCobWipe !
IN MEMORY OF THE CUOF
Sleep well tonight for the 82nd Airborne Division is on point for the nation.
AIRBORNE!
peacockcoins
AG Details
Net PO1
Corroded/Damaged
Photos of the 2006 Boston Massacre
AG Details Net PoO1
Severe Corrosion
:::ANSWER REVEALED:::
peacockcoins
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
I was pretty sure it wasn't an 1856:
The numeral '5' and the relative position of the vertical bar extending down from the "5" to the ball of the numeral "5" indicate this is not an 1856. In the 1856, this imaginary vertical bar splits the ball of the numeral "5" right down the middle.
But the last digit *does* look like a 6. I wonder if this may have been an attempted alteration?
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
<< <i>Wow! The coin didn't get a net grade? >>
Exactly!
It's basically a round, deeply corroded disk with an outline of the Eagle along with some faint lettering. It looks completely rusted out and appears like chunks of it are ready to flake off. No NET grade from ANACS?
By the way... I like it!
peacockcoins
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>Maybe ANACS felt it had Poor-1 details even without the corrosion and there was nowhere left to net it down? >>
Except that the full date is readable and the reverse has full rims. No coin that's PO-1 strictly in terms of wear would be like that.
<< <i>By the way... I like it! >>
Of course you do!