Options
I finally found one! A 93-S in PCGS 69!!!
LincolnCentMan
Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
LincolnCentMan
Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
*******************************************************************************
<< <i>because the little white strip has "sample photo" written on it. >>
you could read that??
<< <i>very nice...but I wonder why he covered the registration number? >>
Either it's a sample photo, or he doesn't want registry folk to steal the number.
One thing's for sure -- when I find a coin I've been looking for, I don't broadcast it to the forum until after the deal is done.
<< <i>
<< <i>because the little white strip has "sample photo" written on it. >>
you could read that?? >>
David
Photos of the 2006 Boston Massacre
Can you folks really get excited over a 10 year old cent???
To each his/her own, but when it comes to moderns like this I'm a Rhett Butler ("frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn").
I also love to go through rolls to find coins.
BST
MySlabbedCoins
<< <i>If you know what I am talking about, you know why that is impressive >>
Because usually wedding rings don't have diamonds? I thought only engagement rings did...
It is a wedding set. The engagement ring and wedding band fit together to form one ring. You are right however, the wedding ring itself usually doesn't have diamonds. My wife's wedding band has diamonds set into the band and has a Colorless/Flawless Princess cut diamond on the engagement ring. It's very pretty. I wasn't gonna go and buy a a ring with diamonds already on it,you can't see them properly to know what grades the would certify at. We bought the diamond separately and had it fitted onto the setting my wife wanted. If you buy a diamond that isn't certified, you had better know the true clarity, cut, and color of the diamond before you drop $3,000.00 on it and you just can't accurately determine the 3-C's when the diamond is already in a setting.
Web: www.tonyharmer.org
<< <i>If you know what I am talking about, you know why that is impressive >>
Seeing that through the tears is impressive
So tell me - how much are you willing to pay for it?
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
Yep- I think you just increased your competition by announcing the cool lincoln you found!
Yah, that was the pun I was trying to make.... I dont think everyone "got it." ...or they chose to ignore it.
David
Edit: I see I wasn't the only one who made this observation. Oh well. This can be revenge on all the Morgan people who put nothing but a date and mintmark in their title, assuming you know what kind of coin they're talking about, as if there's no other coins in the world beside Morgan dollars.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
That's because you've been brainwashed for so long by Morganomaniacs who think that mentioning the type and denomination of a coin is unneccessary, since Morgans are the only coins to have.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
<< <i>That's because you've been brainwashed for so long by Morganomaniacs who think that mentioning the type and denomination of a coin is unneccessary, since Morgans are the only coins to have.
Maybe, but to me there are just certain denominations I think of when someone talks about a date and mint. Say 1914-D, I think cents. 1916-D, I think dimes. 1901-S, gotta be quarters. And with '93-S, I tend to think 1893-S because I'm an "anti-modern bigot" (not really against collecting them; they just don't interest me), and with 1893-S, it's gotta be the Morgan.
Of course, I'm not buying many Morgans these days, since the market is just too crazy right now.
On the other hand, if a sample photo is used for an eBayer that doesn't sell much, and the coin is more unique than a common 69DCAM modern, I would hesitate with a sample photo.
I am glad to see that they started using Paypal, as that is easier. I do like their $1 shpping.
A Really Nice coin though.