As I told several people when I complained about the overgraded ANACS 03-S Morgan, I will point out PCGS coins when I find them. There is no way this coin is an XF45. This is a prime example of why I won't buy this date without large images of both sides:
1893-S
Comments
So if ANACS can't be trusted, and PCGS can't be trusted, then will I ever buy any coins at all? I think I'm going to start collecting beanie babies.
Kyle
I checked the anacs in 45 linked on that page that sold for $5,700.
On the other hand, if it doesn't have significant lustre then I agree with the VF35 assessment.
The ANACS coin isn't in the same league as the PCGS coin, IMO. If the PCGS coin should be a 35, then the ANACS coin should be a 30.
42/92
<< <i>with that much wear I wouldn't call it XF anything >>
Well then I am sure glad that you are not grading my stuff. If I had that coin and sent to PCGS and they graded it anything less than 40 I'd be really miffed.
CG
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
It looks like an "almost" 45
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
jim
Sale 336, Lot 9000 Saturday, January 10, 2004 45 PCGS $12,650.00 (coin below)
People still buy the coin not the plastic.
I also love to go through rolls to find coins.
BST
MySlabbedCoins
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
The ANACS coin...well...it is a desireable date!