Toggle navigation
Quick Links:
Collectors Corner
|
PCGS
|
PSA
|
PSE
|
Collectors.com
|
CU
|
Coinflation
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
U.S. Coin Forum
Opinions on grade.
coinfreak499
Posts:
1,720
July 15, 2004 12:03AM
in
U.S. Coin Forum
for this 1945 S war nickel. alot of the S war nickels I think don't have great strikes and the reverse on this coin is very weak. thanks in advance.
0
Comments
coinfreak499
Posts:
1,720
July 15, 2004 12:07AM
OK I just noticed these pictures suck.
0
ziggy29
Posts:
18,668
✭✭✭
July 15, 2004 12:08AM
Unless these pictures just don't capture the luster, it looks AU-55 to me.
0
razorface1027
Posts:
4,242
✭✭
July 15, 2004 12:08AM
AU-58
What is money, in reality, but dirty pieces of paper and metal upon which privilege is stamped?
0
coinfreak499
Posts:
1,720
July 15, 2004 12:12AM
forgot to mention thta yes is has alot more lustre then thes pictures show I used a scanner.
0
airplanenut
Posts:
22,425
✭✭✭✭✭
July 15, 2004 12:17AM
MS63 or MS64--I can't see it well enough
JK Coin Photography
- eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos |
LOW
Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to
Pancreatic Cancer Research
0
coinfreak499
Posts:
1,720
July 15, 2004 12:19AM
I need a hoster for my images.
0
ziggy29
Posts:
18,668
✭✭✭
July 15, 2004 12:21AM
<< <i>forgot to mention thta yes is has alot more lustre then thes pictures show I used a scanner. >>
Assuming there is decent, unbroken luster, then, I'd probably say 63.
0
clackamas
Posts:
5,615
✭
July 15, 2004 1:15AM
AU 55. The brown looks like typical wear marks.
0
Leave a Comment
Bold
Italic
Strikethrough
Ordered list
Unordered list
Format
Spoiler
Code
Quote
Heading 2
Heading 1
Emoji
Url
Image
Align left
Align center
Align right
Toggle HTML view
Toggle full page
Toggle lights
Drop image/file
Home
•
U.S. Coin Forum
Comment As ...
Comments
<< <i>forgot to mention thta yes is has alot more lustre then thes pictures show I used a scanner. >>
Assuming there is decent, unbroken luster, then, I'd probably say 63.